Stop being a prude and enjoy cutting into her fillets like a very normal dude
Posts by badmarble
for @theflytrapmedia.com today, I wrote about how the fascist fuckos want to us to be spectators to our own lives, isolated from each other and literally throwing money and time away
If we fail to expand and reform the court the wildly different decisions on view point discrimination are going to grind their credibility into dust
Discovery is going to be more lit than him.
We have a rule in our house, and it’s that if Margot-Rita (our Tortie) jumps out, you’re legally required to pretend she got you
Not to mention the airlines. Foreign operators are prohibited from carrying passengers between two US locations.
The US bans, prohibits, or restricts all types of things for mostly protectionist reasons.
Because most Americans don’t understand that nearly all U.S. healthcare is subsidized in some form, whether through employer payments, government programs, or tax breaks that quietly shift costs to the public.
We just enjoy the illusion of self-reliance and paying more for no reason.
It’s not a longing for inconvenience. It’s subscription fatigue and a desire not to be a lifelong renter of the things you enjoy. I can’t pass a digital anything onto my niece, and if I could, some rent-seeking a-hole would try to charge her for it.
I would say “the cloud” comes close, but it was so expensive, in every sense, that the market forced measured adoption. But, no, there hasn’t been anything with the level of penetration LLMs have.
This is in a nutshell why I don't use Facebook anymore. Under their current moderation rules, you can use slurs for trans people and advocate for our wholesale slaughter, but can't say "the Allies storming the beach of Normandy were the ANTIFA of their time" or else they flag you for terrorism.
I have to say, if I saw you out and clocked those, I would be lowkey very excited. Hope they work. 🖖🏾
“Guys, I tried my best for less than a day and wasn’t up to snuff, Vance 2028 ✌️✌️”
Thanks, I’ve been looking for this for years and couldn’t remember the name
A real good news, bad news situation
A hardcover book titled RED: A History of the Redhead by Jacky Colliss Harvey lies on a wooden surface. The cover features a detailed, classical-style painting of a pale-skinned woman with long, vivid red hair and soft facial features, gazing slightly to the side. Flowers are woven into her hair on the left side, adding a decorative, romantic element. The title appears in a cream-colored box on the left side of the cover, with “RED” in large red letters and the subtitle and author’s name in smaller text beneath.
I’m not sure how or when I acquired this book (RED: A History of the Redhead by Jacky Colliss Harvey), but it was a quick and interesting read, covering a range of topics, from art to sociology, and genetics to anthropology. #BookSky
10000% this. The DNC is incredibly unresponsive to regular people. If they need money, they should get a refund from all those consultants they love to hire.
"Eric Adams was granted citizenship to a Mediterranean country"
"the one he was getting bribes from?"
"somehow no"
I wish it were so. Unfortunately, I pulled that quote from the wrong article, and a user shared a screenshot showing that small donors continue to appear. Which I think is sad, but factual. My mistake.
I agree. However, I pulled that quote from the wrong article. Another user shared a screen cap supporting the OPs comment. My mistake.
A screenshot of a paragraph from a news article discussing political fundraising. The text explains that while large donations to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) have been slow, small donors continue to contribute significantly. It notes that the DNC raised over $5 million from donors giving $200 or less in February, comparable to both the Republican National Committee’s (RNC) small-dollar fundraising that month and the DNC’s own figures from February 2022. The paragraph also mentions a political figure named Martin highlighting this success while criticizing Republicans for relying on large “billionaire donations,” contrasting it with Democrats’ emphasis on grassroots donor support. Screenshot reads: While big donations to the DNC have been slow to come in, small donors are still giving generously. The DNC raised more than $5 million from donors giving $200 or less in February, similar to the RNC's small-dollar haul that month and their own February 2022 small-dollar contributions. Martin touted the successful month by attacking Republicans for leaning on "billionaire donations" while Democrats were "proud to be powered by grassroots donors making their voices heard."
I deleted it. I don’t have a wapo account so I searched and accidentally pulled from an earlier piece. Another user shared this screenshot with the correct quote supporting the OPs comment
Polymarket decides which “predictions” go up on the site. It’s only a matter of time before we find out that the founder and some combination of executives are getting kickbacks for allowing insider trading.
He doesn’t have the juice. He knows if he takes the mantle now, he’ll never be president-elect; even though, I think, he's unelectable since he’s an evil little chameleon that is entirely hollow and is infected with whatever the opposite of charisma is.
A New View of the Moon NASA ID: art002e009287 art002e009287 (April 6, 2026) – Earth sets at 6:41 p.m. EDT, April 6, 2026, over the Moon’s curved limb in this photo captured by the Artemis II crew during their journey around the far side of the Moon. Orientale basin is perched on the edge of the visible lunar surface. Hertzsprung Basin appears as two subtle concentric rings, which are interrupted by Vavilov, a younger crater superimposed over the older structure. The lines of indentations are secondary crater chains formed by ejecta from the massive impact that created Orientale. The dark portion of Earth is experiencing nighttime. On Earth’s day side, swirling clouds are visible over the Australia and Oceania region. Date Created:2026-04-06 Center:JSC Keywords: Artemis , Artemis II , Moon , Earth , Lunar Flyby , Earthset Photographer:NASA
We can still have nice things.
A New View of the Moon
NASA ID: art002e009287
images.nasa.gov/details/art0...
This is why most, if not all, of them will go down by his hand. In his mind, he is flawless, and therefore any failure couldn’t possibly be his fault.
It’s always someone else who cheated, lied, or was incompetent
He can’t admit fault. It’s Shakespearean. The only one who can undo him is himself.
The framing that Bondi blundered her way into getting fired is incorrect. She was always destined to fail because her job was to make his lies a reality, and that was a losing proposition from the jump.
They’re so diluted that they believe the force of will can override any truth in perpetuity.
gd this is good
Probably no pardon either 😭
twisting in the wind
The highlighted text reads: “The experience for people will get way more relevant, way more personal, and hopefully be seen as a much better value exchange. All of the research indicates people want to be known. Don't serve me shoes I bought three weeks ago. Don't serve me ads that aren't relevant." A screenshot of an article with a block of text highlighted in blue. The highlighted quote discusses conversational advertising, emphasizing that it allows for more follow-ups and creates a more relevant and personalized experience for users. It suggests people want ads tailored to them and not repetitive or irrelevant, giving an example of not wanting to see ads for shoes already purchased weeks earlier. Blue text-selection handles appear at the top right and bottom of the highlighted section, indicating the text is being selected on a mobile device.
This is preference misinterpretation and solution bias. Nobody wants this, but they paid a market researcher to come up with questions that would give them a false frame to pitch against. Grifters and hacks.
A bold, stylized podcast cover with a bright pink-magenta background. Centered is a classical statue of Lady Justice (blindfolded), rendered in a metallic tone that blends into the background. Large white serif text reads “Amicus”, with smaller yellow text underneath: “with Dahlia Lithwick.” The composition emphasizes law and justice themes with a modern, high-contrast aesthetic.
A clean, minimal podcast cover on a blue background. Large white block text reads “STRICT SCRUTINY.” In the foreground, a judge’s gavel lies across a round base, but the head of the gavel is stylized as a retro microphone, visually merging law and media. The design suggests legal analysis or discussion presented in a broadcast or conversational format.
Please look to professionals on SCOTUS reporting and analysis. Opinions and feelings of others can be important for context, but if you want to understand how rulings will impact you, legally seek some experts:
Strict Scrutiny: crooked.com/podcast-seri...
Amicus (Slate): slate.com/podcasts/ami...
Culture Crave sucks:
aftermath.site/culture-crave-...