Our climate ‘solutions' - including the energy-transition - are delusionally-inadequate in the face of accelerating temperatures. This details why. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Posts by
Carbon Removal was never any more a 'solution' than the 'energy-transition'. Time to be honest about how delusionally-inadequate our climate responses really are. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Carbon capture - like the 'energy transition' and all our current climate 'solutions' - is just laughably inadequate. Accelerating temperatures mean we need a radical rethink... open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Well okay, but the vast majority have no idea how serious and how urgent the impacts of climate change will soon become. Nor do they know how hopelessly-inadequate our current solutions really are. Way past time to start telling people the truth under both headings. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Yes we do have to stop. And that starts with being realistic about the hopelessly-inadequate ‘solutions’ we are currently pretending will achieve this... open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
And this will still make absolutely zero difference in the context of accelerating climate change... open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Thanks - yes it was. And yes I agree, it's tough to contemplate these things. I find myself triple-checking everything, but sadly it still all looks accurate.
It has to be about climate change now. Your starting point could be the heads of the German Physics Society and German Meteo Service forecasting +3.0°C above pre-industrial by 2050. And you could also have a read of this... jacksondamian.substack.com/p/solution-d...
Indeed - and too much emphasis on 'proving' things using methods they know cannot keep up, when it would be far more honest/simple to state it's obviously all bl**dy climate change now.
It might help if climate coverage 'leaders' like the Guardian - not to mention most leading scientists and especially the IPCC (present company excepted), told the truth about how bad they know things really are. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Only a matter of time before a wildfire wipes a major city from the face of the planet
Will people sit up and take notice then?
Will governments and fossil fuel corporations act to slash emissions?
Will they hell
www.theguardian.com/world/2025/j...
Scientists and especially the IPCC massively underestimate speed of climate change and related risks - shock. Because their methods very obviously can't keep up. Will these people ever learn? open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Because global net-zero - an impossible target (without radical, massive reductions in activity no-one is planning) supposed to prevent us breaching a temp limit by 2100 we've already smashed through - is so meaningful. Farcical.
NEW PETITION: We want the Government to prioritise adaptation; fund a new Resilience Plan that works with nature and includes public education, infrastructure standards and local funding. Help us by signing this @climatemajority.bsky.social petition.
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/73...
More proof - as if it were needed - of how far off the models are, especially those relied on by the IPCC. Not sure, however, about the 'optimistic' (complacent?) suggestion acceleration may be short-lived...
Thanks but I thought we were not in a La Niña? Climate Prediction Center: ENSO Diagnostic Discussion share.google/Z6sESLaseI5q...
Wow - this guy is deluded af. First dismisses Suzuki as 'a scientist'. Then lists a bunch of BS non-solutions we're not even doing any more. But then claims we are winning and losing simultaneously. In denial like so many in the green 'industry'.
Have you seen any suggested explanations for the June downturn please - even if this remains high compared to most previous years?
Regional acceleration of warming is much more apparent even:
Acceleration of global warming is more apparent when looking at the oceans:
This is hilarious. A rise of 4.3'C by 2070 'could' result in no further need for actuaries - or anything else, you numpties.
Some signs of intelligent life in the UK. Perhaps too little too late, but at least trying to put something in place in advance of the sh*t really hitting the... www.bylinesupplement.com/p/adapting-s...
Another deeply concerning feedback loop reducing the CO2-absorption capacity of natural sinks - don't expect IPCC models or net-zero plans to reflect this any time soon. Also ignore pathetic fake-hopeful message about breeding 'resistant strains' saving all the forests - idiots.
Yes it is. Still the Guardian can't stop itself finishing the article with an absurd 'hopeful' message about breeding resistant new strains or whatever, not remotely applicable on a planetary scale, if at all. Idiots.
Unbelievably complacent. Unbelievably misleading. The vast majority of global energy use is from fossil fuels. 'Renewables' are additional not alternative to these. Only drastic cuts in consumption/destruction could do anything now. But the green 'industry' can't tell you that.
That will make all the difference of course. Scientists - especially climate scientists and the IPCC - urgently need to find effective ways of communicating how bad, they know, things really are. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...
Thanks but with genuine respect - who do the authors think will pay the slightest attention to this warning in this form? All the evidence shows the answer is no-one. Way more radical action/comms are urgently needed (as per suggestions in article posted) but starting with calling out the IPCC.