They do that shit when they spread misinformation and you point out the shit they're saying isn't true.

It was so fucking awful before the Switch 2 even came out

Disgusting creatures

Same!

#Patapon #Vrchat

Happy to be meat in the middle

They turn into tonfa chucks

Oh that makes sense. So from their perspective did they feel naked too? I really like those looks too. I'd like to see the boys wear clothes more often just because they want to and not just disguises thanks to those looks.
You were really into something there.

Was there any idea for an in universe reason for why they suddenly started wearing pants for a while? I'd imagine they tried it since Jennika wore clothes, which I assume is largely from being used to it from being human.

That's what Mikey had in that series iirc

It almost feels like NECA is avoiding IDW but also like it's just a matter of time? They nail specific styles so well I'd love to see them do both Sophie and Santaloucos styles.

Especially if they start dipping into alternate looks. I want prison Raph, street clothes Raph, ect

Damnit, I don't love how the McFarlane toys are looking (I'm still holding out for NECA IDW) but I may have to at least grab this

I have good references for Ratty's face but nothing great for the very specific shapes of his ears and wings.

But his model is actually a perfect representation of them!

She can evolve now!

I'll give her a secondary outfit later. I also wanna figure out how to make her grow slightly when this toggle is turned on

CassetteBat - Twitch MASTER TRAINER RANK UNLOCKED

www.twitch.tv/cassettebat

Bratty! Cass's mom made her and then Ratty brought her to life.

Giggly chaotic energy.

Nothing gets her down or seems to hurt her, even if she gets ripped apart.

This is still the funniest thing that ever happened to me in Tomodachi Life

I made the gyaru/gal Bulbsaur from #Pokopia!

#Pokemon #Vrchat #Mamehinata

Like, Drifloon having a tiny mouth on top of the X tape just seems wrong.

And I HATE how Banettes mouth unzips and the teeth are on the bottom.

Rowletts mouth also opens different from what I imagined and it makes sense in hindsight but still looks weirder.

The amount of Pokemon designs that get slightly ruined when you see how their mouth animation works should be studied.

It's crazy how often this happens.

What are all the examples you can think of?

It is EXTREMELY important to understand that the banning of "problematic" fictional media that doesn't involve or create any real world harm to real people, but instead is merely "moral disgust" WILL set the table for banning LGBT content for the same reasoning.

Things are "bad" because of the harm they do. Even if something is utterly disgusting, if it's not doing tangible, actual harm, then it's not actually "bad" and should be left alone

Because like I said, that establishes people banning harmless shit they think is icky, and that'll be LGBT eventually

Hey that's great that you're actually thinking about it though! A lot of people dig in their heels and won't apply critical thinking to stuff like this.

My stance is always "if it's not hurting anyone, it doesn't matter how fucked up something is, people should be allowed to make and enjoy it"

We can NOT allow "ok this doesn't ACTUALLY hurt anything (aside from BS we try to make up) but it's really disgusting and "morally wrong" so ban it"

Do you want LGBT content to become illegal? That's how LGBT content becomes illegal. We are watching the line move more and more in real time.

"not good"

No, it's fine because it's a bunch of pixels and no actual person is being hurt or victimized.

It's ok to enjoy fucked up fictional content as long as it's purely fictional, even if you find it disgusting.

The nuance is the difference between stylized drawing of imaginary fictional characters not being the same as actual real people being harmed and victimized.

Things are bad when they cause actual harm.

Not because they give someone the ick.

No it's a valid statement. It's fucked up to conflate drawings of imaginary fictional characters with real living beings who cannot consent.

No it isn't.