Admixture bar plot showing genetic structure across 27 named dromedary camel-types from Asia and Africa at multiple clustering levels (K = 2, 3, 5, 10, 16). Each vertical bar represents one individual, colored by proportional membership in genetic clusters. Vertical white lines separate camel-types labeled above, with country abbreviations below (on x-axis). At K = 2, individuals broadly separate into two main groups corresponding to African camel-types (e.g., Borena, Rendille, Turkana, Gabbra) versus most others, with Omani camels already distinct. At K = 3, three main clusters emerge: a unique Omani group, a distinct African group, and a third group containing remaining camel-types. At higher K values, additional substructure appears within some camel-types (e.g., Hadana, Awarik, Awadi, Pakistani Kohi and Raidi, and Majaheem), but many individuals show mixed ancestry, with colors spread across camel-types. Overall, the plot illustrates that genetic clustering aligns more strongly with geographic origin than with named camel-types, which often do not form clearly distinct genetic groups.
Across 27 dromedary camel-types, DNA analysis showed that names based on coat color often didn’t match real genetic boundaries. The strongest pattern was geography: camel-types cluster broadly by origin (Asia vs. Africa). #2026MMM #RIP doi.org/10.1093/jher...