Blessed is the pour of spirits 🍸

A man of… some people, a few people.
Influential people who don’t know, nor need a “corner store.”

Who voted for this Everyman?

A man of… some people, a few people.
Influential people who don’t know, nor need a “corner store.”

If, IF I decide to watch news, it’s BBC.
Otherwise I’ll read AP, Reuters, or Propublica. And the recommended posts for personally trusted sources on here.

Actually, I believe that’s…
Damn it!

Oh thank GOD it’s not just me
I felt seen and embarrassed at the same time

You meet only five types of people at craft cocktail bars. Prove me wrong.

thelongbar.substack.com/p/the-5-drin...

Only ONE year?!

#Cheers

Post the best picture you have ever taken of your pet(s).

Only ONE year?!

#Cheers

#Cheers

Photo of glass mosaic of redwood tree

Side view of photo of glass mosaic of redwood tree

Photo of glass mosaic of redwood tree

I normally don’t post my art (mosaics, stained glass and watercolor). But this piece was made for my husband who is visually impaired. This is a mosaic tactile piece called “Looking Up”. He loves touching redwoods so now he can go get a feel of glass bark, when we are not actually in a forest.

I love it!

A court ruled one whiskey bottle looked too much like another. Which would be more convincing if most whiskey bottles didn’t already look like they came from the same 19th-century saloon.

thelongbar.substack.com/p/who-owns-t...

This is an article about the opposite of hospitality. Anti-hospitality, I suppose. A closely-related topic that also needs to be addressed is music volume and ambient sound pressure levels.

I'm in the Nacho Hat Half-empty camp

Maybe a Pendennis Club?

I've never seen or heard anyone refer to the Supreme Court as “dude.”

Or, you could read the entire thread, check his profile to learn he is a reporter who reports facts, and read his other posts to learn his character.
It's much better than having a knee-jerk reaction.

He reported the court’s ruling. That isn't a comment he threw in there. It’s part of the ruling.

Wow. All of that because he reported what the court ruled. None of it was his opinion.
But thanks for sharing your lack of reading comprehension.

dude, do you always share your lack of reading comprehension?

You should delete this.
He’s reporting on what the court ruled, it's NOT his opinion.

Mark isn't
He's reporting the court’s opinion

Your anger is understandable.
But it seems to be blinding you, as you are targeting that anger at the messenger of a court ruling.
You want them to also inform you of how bad they believe the ruling is.
…maybe try reading their other skeets for that.

#Cheers

🗃

#Cheers

🗃

50% re-sharing for the Badger Liquor sign
50% because it's Madison