[AEP Explainers] Partisanship (with Hrishikesh Joshi) YouTube video by PPE at UNC

Excited to share our fifth (and final) "explainer video"! (Refresher: these are ~5 min animations introducing applied epistemology concepts for a wide audience.) This one's on partisanship, featuring a script by Rishi Joshi! Please share & consider using in teaching!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke2c...

Alex Worsnip, Covert Value Judgments in Expert Testimony - PhilPapers Scientific experts frequently say things that encode value judgments, not least when they are called on to offer advice or recommendations. Often, however, the value judgments underlying their testimo...

New paper! I investigate cases where experts tacitly encode value judgments into their public pronouncements, and examine the complications this presents for the rationality of deference to experts, with a particular focus on pandemic policy. (1/2)
philpapers.org/rec/WORCVJ

[AEP Explainers] Ignorance (with Jessie Munton) YouTube video by PPE at UNC

Very excited to share our fourth "explainer video". (Refresher: these are ~5 min animations introducing applied epistemology concepts for a wide audience.) This one's on ignorance, featuring a script by Jessie Munton! Please share & consider using in teaching!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOj3...

Uh, make that 2026. Apologies!

Whoops! Yes!!

Interested in serving as a respondent? Apply by October 31st; instructions here: philevents.org/event/show/1... (3/3)

We have a fantastic, interdisciplinary lineup including @aecoppock.bsky.social, @kfrostarnold.bsky.social, Megan Hyska, Rishi Joshi, @jleadermaynard.bsky.social, @pamukz.bsky.social, @gordpennycook.bsky.social, and @esydnor.bsky.social. (2/3)

We're delighted to announce the fourth (and final!) Applied Epistemology Project workshop, on Applied Epistemology in Times of Political Crisis, here at UNC on March 6-7, 2025. (1/3)

AEP research getting out there! 👏👏👏

What Is Wrong with Epistemic Trespassing? Epistemic Trespassing and the Division of Cognitive Labour

I wrote about epistemic trespassing and why it is bad for my Substack. Tl;dr: it is tempting to talk about it as a moral failing but I think it is often more helpful to view trespassing behaviour as a rational response to bad incentives.

rbnmckenna86.substack.com/p/what-is-wr...

New blog post! AEP postdoc Will Conner discusses recent news that Meta has been accused of cheating on AI benchmark tests, leading to a broader discussion of the value of such tests drawing on Thi Nguyen's work on gamification and value capture. Check it out!
aep.unc.edu/2025/07/09/g...

Megapod: The Crisis in American Science Plain English with Derek Thompson · Episode

Good Plain English pod featuring @holdenthorp.bsky.social. I appreciated Holden’s candor regarding scientists’ attempts to influence politics and when such attempts might edge into epistemic trespassing, which is an idea addressed in our recent paper (1/2) open.spotify.com/episode/4Pee...

[AEP Explainers] The Epistemology of Free Speech (with Robert Simpson) YouTube video by PPE at UNC

Very excited to share our third "explainer video". (Refresher: these are ~5 min animations introducing applied epistemology concepts for a wide audience.) This one's on epist of free speech, featuring a script by Rob Simpson! Please share & consider using in teaching!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMgb...

Devin Lane, Should You Defer to Individual Experts? - PhilPapers Should you defer to individual experts? That is, when a single expert – rather than a group of experts or even expert consensus – testifies that p, should you believe that ...

But what about when an individual expert tells you something and you don't know whether it's the consensus or subject to expert disagreement? Should you defer then? In his new paper forthcoming in PPR, AEP Fellow Devin Lane argues that you generally shouldn't. Check it out:
philpapers.org/rec/LANSYD

Devin Lane, Should You Defer to Individual Experts? - PhilPapers Should you defer to individual experts? That is, when a single expert – rather than a group of experts or even expert consensus – testifies that p, should you believe that ...

Many (applied) epistemologists think that when you know that there's expert consensus about something, you should defer to the expert consensus. And many of them also think that when you know the experts disagree, you should suspend judgment. (1/2)

Reminder: tomorrow is the deadline to apply for this! It's a chance to get expert instruction in public writing on applied epistemology, feedback from peers, and to enjoy an in-person workshop here at UNC

🥁🎉It's time again! My colleague Thomas Grundmann is organising the Cologne Summer School in Philosophy. This year's star is @aworsnip.bsky.social (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 🎊📢
You can find more information on the following website: cssip.uni-koeln.de
Spread the word and repost!

Interested in writing applied epistemology for a public-facing audience? Apply to be part of our new working group! It'll meet four times over the summer, followed by a capstone in-person event here at UNC in September facilitated by Eleanor Gordon-Smith. Details here:
philevents.org/event/show/1...

[AEP Explainers] Political Polarization (with Kevin Dorst) YouTube video by PPE at UNC

Very excited to share our second "explainer video". (Refresher: these are ~5 min animations introducing applied epistemology concepts for a wide audience.) This one's on polarization, featuring a script by Kevin Dorst! Please share, consider using in teaching, etc!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9nd...

Fascinating new post on our blog by Emily McWilliams, discussing the denial and undertreatment of women's pain in medical procedures through the lens of applied epistemological work on testimonial injustice, manufactured ignorance, and motivated reasoning:
aep.unc.edu/2025/03/17/t...

New Paper in Philosophical Psychology:

Trust in experts is low. Why? How bad is it? And what should we do? To answer these questions, we reviewed philosophy (when *ought* we defer to the experts) and psychology (when *do* people defer to the experts).

Link in comments!

Philosophy and Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Future Philosophy and Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Future Social media play a significant role in the life of many people. For example, through these platforms we can not only connect a...

i'm taking part in this philosophy panel on the future of social media next month, with @geneickers.bsky.social, @joe-saunders.bsky.social, and organiser @annabortolan.bsky.social.

it's online and open to the public, so sign up if you want to hear some hot takes!

Samuel Alito and the Ethics of Suspicion Exploring the changing nature of public debate

I wrote a blog post about Samuel Alito as a case study in the ethics of suspicion and psychologizing
blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/openfordebat...

Check out this interdisciplinary review paper on deference to experts by a team of AEP Fellows (current and past)!

Consider applying to be part of this summer school (aimed at researchers of all career stages) on applied epistemology featuring AEP Director @aworsnip.bsky.social!

How populist leaders like Trump use ‘common sense’ as an ideological weapon to undermine facts When common sense is promoted as a virtue, it’s not just to celebrate how regular people understand the world. It promotes a worldview that rejects empirical facts and paves the way for propaganda.

New from me @theconversation.com
We're witnessing a celebration of "common sense" among the new admin & their allies.

But remember: celebrating common sense and denigrating expertise/evidence IS ideological.

And is NOT a reliable path to truth.

theconversation.com/how-populist...

I’ve been studying this problem since 2015. Obviously the nature of this changed with the birth of X. It’s gone from over-indexed on the political nerds & activists to over-indexed on Nazis & fascists. It’s no good.

Social Identity and Epistemic Privilege Is there an epistemic advantage to being oppressed?

I started a Political Epistemology substack, and I decided to begin with an uncontroversial topic.

I currently have 3 followers, but I welcome more!

missed tag: @mvazquez.bsky.social

Will Conner introducing the event.

Yan Chen and Will Conner smiling at the event.

...navigating misinformation, and promoting responsible belief formation in their classrooms. Thanks to everyone who contributed to the thoughtful conversations, to @theihs.org and the Parr Center for Ethics for their support, and to Yan Chen, Will Conner, and Michael Vazquez for organizing! (2/2)