"I have never had any knowledge of Epstein’s abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity—I was not a participant, was never on Epstein’s plane, and never visited his private island."
An oddly specific thing say.
Posts by Scott Koon
Developing story. It will be very interesting to see whether Kash Patel's FBI found the correct suspect, and how.
It would also be helpful if someone ran him through facial recognition to see if he was on Capitol grounds on January 6th.
nymag.com/intelligence...
In the interview, she keeps talking about her love for RFK Jr while also being indignant about the nature of the relationship. Miller even tried to give her an out by inviting her to characterize it as an infatuation, and she balked.
Red flags all the way down.
Literally at the very beginning of her career, a very transactional tour of duty as an intern for Weiner. She wrote an exposé about it and said the campaign staff had "short resumés."
She was only 20 at the time, it was before she dropped out of college.
www.cbsnews.com/news/weiner-...
She looks good on television and got a lucky break from Anthony Weiner.
They will kill the trees even if the books are inevitably remaindered.
He was so gentle, generous and patient with her.
She lucked into this amazing career based on very little actual talent, and yet was indignant about being asked exactly the questions she had to know would be asked. It was surreal.
This whole episode raises questions about how she got her start from the very beginning, with Anthony Weiner joking that she should be nicknamed "Monica."
Thereafter, a meteoric rise up the journalistic food chain, mainly accomplished by access journalism.
Great episode, once again we are sticking closely to the 2025/1933 timeline.
In an episode with so many mentions of Victor Klemperer
and his cousin Otto, it seems like a shame not to at least mention Otto's avowedly antifascist son Werner.
New episode! Today on @inbedwiththeright.bsky.social , we return to our Project 1933 series and the rise of the Nazi regime. This month, we’re looking hard at collaborators and complicity: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
This graffito really captures something of the spirit of our age.
The folks who run Trader Joe's won't put one in Durham, so we have to make the long drive to the one in Chapel Hill.
Which is now closed until further notice due to water damage from the flooding. Thanks, Trump.
The river by the bridge at West Point on the Eno on Roxboro Road.
The water's supposed to be 20 feet lower.
Here's the USGS monitoring data if you're interested.
No deaths locally, at least one in a neighboring county. The river's higher than it's been in the 20 years I've lived here.
waterdata.usgs.gov/monitoring-l...
It was a very heavy rainstorm, but no warning seems to have been issued.
Simply moist in my neighborhood, but a half mile down the road someone did try to drive through five feet of standing water, with predictable results.
www.wral.com/news/local/d...
Yesterday it was 1.65 feet, and it's 23.35 feet at the moment.
Flooding here in Durham. Here, the Eno River is normally 3 feet deep, but this morning it overflowed its banks and was 20' above the normal level, just a couple of feet under the bridges.
It's as if the Gulf of Tonkin incident reverberated and amplified. The past is never dead, it's not even past.
Which makes being old and reading even older books a kind of superpower. Sometimes I think I should stop teaching and start a YouTube channel, it would be 10,000 times more effective.
I think some of these are certainly inflection points. For example, I was in Berlin for the LaBelle Discotheque bombing. At the time, all the chatter was about Syria, but Reagan wanted to attack Libya, so they decided it was Libya.
www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...
The past is prologue. We've never had any consequences for the folks who decided to attack Iraq at the behest of the Saudis, I suppose it was silly to expect it would be different this time.
At least there's Dennis. In a world full of Bedeveres, always glad to know Dennis exists.
They never had to show their work. It would have come up in any prosecution of the organizer tier of defendants, so they skipped that tier altogether, while prosecuting these parading defendants.
Almost as if they thought that the interest of the Republican Party was more important than the law.
In so many ways, we've reverted to the middle ages.
Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
--Dennis
Good episode. One thing I recall anecdotally is that most folks in Berlin at the time were very skeptical, not just of the authenticity, but also of the motive beyond just the usual greed. Sight unseen, most on the left saw it as a whitewash of Hitler.
Despite some outdated and offensive language about "natives," McLuhan managed to summarize life in what he called the electric age back in 1977.
youtu.be/ULI3x8WIxus?...
But it just references "documents on file with the Committee."
They had at least some of the financials, but decided not to include these on the govinfo site or in the Report.
Presumably it's all been shredded now.
For all the claims of weaponization, it's clear that they didn't go far enough. I think because of first amendment concerns, they took a very conservative approach to charging the rally organization. Martin's letter notes he funded certain STS activities.
Or they decided that they would lose in court, because money is speech and it's commonplace to pay or reimburse people for political activities. Or they felt they couldn't prove such payments had anything to do with the attack itself.