Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Patrick Sturgis

Financial Fair Play in the Premier League doesn't work and they should just get rid of it.

7 months ago 1 0 1 0

It was an incredibly poor performance and result. Terrible team selection, tactic and substitutions. Big call to start Hermansson which backfired. He’s under huge pressure now.

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

I can already say with some confidence West Ham are getting relegated this season. 2-0 down to Sunderland on day 1 and Potter brings on Callum Wilson and Andy Irvine. We lose 3-0.

8 months ago 1 0 3 0

QED

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

I wouldn't see that, he blocked me.

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

As I said, Twitter is awful, a total cesspit. Bluesky is nice but boring, liberal people agreeing with eacher other. like being a Guardian reader in the 90s, although you didn't get punishment beatings for wrongthink then.

8 months ago 0 0 1 0

Ha ha ha 😂

8 months ago 4 0 0 0
Advertisement

I'm not sure that would be very helpful if you were prosecuting these 2 people in a court of law.

8 months ago 0 0 1 0

I mean that if a bunch of left-wing liberals flee X to Bsky because X is too rightwing then follow a heuristic of "block jerks, don't feed trolls", it's a recipe for very boring ideological conformity. This is why Bluesky is boring and rapidly losing subscribers.

8 months ago 0 1 7 1

will have a read!

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

the big problem is when you move beyond banning what is unlawful (not itself unproblematic given many laws), how do you decide what can and can't be said? That is how you end up with Twitter banning women from saying there are only 2 sexes.

8 months ago 0 0 1 0

do you also think that banning legal speech is problematic, i.e. once the threshold moves beyond what is lawful?

8 months ago 0 0 1 0

And that pressure can result in lawful speech being banned, such as women expressing gender critical beliefs on pre-Musk Twitter. Making perceived harm the threshold is therefore highly problematic for free speech in a democratic society.

8 months ago 1 0 1 0

So who gets to decide whether these tweets, that you presumably selected as being egregious examples, are a "coded incitement to violence" or observations?

8 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

Haven't been on here for a while but popped over to take a look because Twitter is so awful. Some interesting discussions going on but I'm mostly struck by the rigid ideological conformity and thirst for punishing those who indulge in wrongthink. Should I try Threads?

8 months ago 4 1 11 1

Not defending them obviously but it kind of does make a difference in understanding the motivation in that mindless morons boo the opposition no matter the extent of the bad taste. I've witnessed it many times.

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

It was the Palace fans

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

the obvious defence the people you have screenshotted would mount is that they aren't calling for terrorist violence but predicting it will happen.

8 months ago 1 0 2 1

It's rooted in complying with the law. But practically, trans-identifying women ('trans men') aren't the problem here, no man is going to care if they use the men's toilets. Alternatively, they can use mixed-sex toilets.

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

My, admittedly somewhat limited, experience of GPT-5 has not been good. Particularly weird that it didn't even know how to code API calls to itself.

8 months ago 3 0 0 0
OSF

New working paper with Tom Robinson, Laura Fung and Caroline Roberts. We use an LLM to classify occupations in surveys in real time, probing 'intelligently' when more info is needed. Results show big reductions in cost, time and respondent burden.

osf.io/preprints/so...

8 months ago 6 4 1 0
Post image

👣 "Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases: Tracking Undercoverage in Web Tracking Data" by Bosch et al. @orioljbosch.bsky.social @patricksturg.bsky.social Read: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Featured in our latest issue!

8 months ago 1 1 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
AI labeling reduces the perceived accuracy of online content but has limited broader effects Explicit labeling of online content produced by artificial intelligence (AI) is a widely mooted policy for ensuring transparency and promoting public confidence. Yet little is known about the scope of...

New working paper with Chuyao Wang and Dan De Kadt, "AI labeling reduces the perceived accuracy of online content but has limited broader effects". The title is a concise summary but read the full paper for details: arxiv.org/abs/2506.16202

9 months ago 2 1 0 0

The greatest tennis match of all time.

10 months ago 2 0 0 0

Interesting, I've never been to Reading.

10 months ago 3 0 1 0

these are what are called ad hominem arguments. Look it up.

10 months ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
two men are standing next to each other in a kitchen and one of them says " london baby " ALT: two men are standing next to each other in a kitchen and one of them says " london baby "

On my way to London for #MASS25. Excited for two days of discussions on Mobile Apps and Sensors in Surveys. Shoutout to my fantastic co-organizers (for the 6th (!) time) @peterlugtig.bsky.social, @jkhoehne.bsky.social, Bella Struminskaya and generous local host @patricksturg.bsky.social

10 months ago 5 2 1 1
headshot of professor patrick sturgis

headshot of professor patrick sturgis

🤖 Recent advances in AI are beginning to reshape how we design, implement, and analyse surveys.

@patricksturg.bsky.social‬ will be sharing his expertise at UCL's AI for Survey Data Collection Methods and Data Analysis workshop on 9 July.

@clscohorts.bsky.social‬

10 months ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
‘A real mess’: splits emerge in Labour over supreme court’s gender ruling Growing number of MPs are questioning Keir Starmer’s claim that ruling has brought ‘clarity’ to issue

No @theguardian.com the SC judgment is absolutely clear. What you are struggling with is how you lot are going to keep misrepresenting the law now the judgment is in.
www.theguardian.com/world/2025/m...

10 months ago 3 0 0 0

Isn't having coppers out looking for you being tracked by the state?

10 months ago 0 0 1 0