Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by WorkWell

Preview
Workplace Dynamics Playbook — WorkWell A must-have guide for both employees and leaders. Learn to navigate workplace challenges, advocate for yourself, and take action to create a fairer, more inclusive workplace. Includes strategies, scripts, and leadership insights.

Ever been ghosted after submitting a perfect application? Talk to me.

Let’s talk. And if you want real strategies to navigate workplace bias - human or AI-driven…

Get the FREE Workplace Dynamics Playbook here:

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

And if you’re in leadership?

If you don’t know how your hiring or evaluation tools make decisions, you shouldn’t be using them.

Audit them for bias. Test them for fairness.

Because if your AI is excluding great talent, you’re the one responsible.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

So if you’re a job seeker, here’s your move:

Game the system.

AI favours specific words, formatting, and structures. Use keywords from job descriptions. Keep your resume simple. Get past the filters first, so a human sees your work.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

And because AI is invisible, so is the discrimination.

A hiring algorithm rejects your resume but never tells you why
A performance tool scores you lower but you never get to challenge it
AI flags you as a “risky hire” & you never even make it to the interview

Bias with no one to hold accountable.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

This isn’t just a theory, it’s already happening.

A 2023 study found AI-driven hiring software favours white-sounding names, therefore reinforcing racial bias in recruitment.

If you’re already facing barriers in the workplace? AI isn’t breaking them. It’s reinforcing them.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

AI isn’t thinking. It’s predicting. And what does it predict?

That the best candidates look like the ones who got hired before.
That the strongest leaders fit the same old mould.
That the right people for the job have the same background, the same name, the same profile.

Sound familiar? It should.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

“AI is neutral.”

Sure. Just like hiring, promotions, and performance reviews are neutral.

Except… they’re not.

Bias already exists in the workplace. AI doesn’t remove it, it scales it.

And if you think it can’t happen to you, think again.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Workplace Dynamics Playbook — WorkWell A must-have guide for both employees and leaders. Learn to navigate workplace challenges, advocate for yourself, and take action to create a fairer, more inclusive workplace. Includes strategies, scripts, and leadership insights.

Have you ever been penalised just for doing your actual job? Let’s talk.

And if you’re ready to navigate workplace dynamics without it costing your career?

Get the FREE Workplace Dynamics Playbook here:

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

And if you’re in leadership? Before blaming employees, ask:
Are they disengaged... or just disillusioned?
Are they coasting... or are they exhausted?
Are they Quiet Quitting... or are you quiet failing them?

When your best people stop going the extra mile, it’s not about laziness. It’s about trust.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

So if you’ve pulled back, ask yourself:
Is it boundaries or burnout?
Do you still care about the work or are you just done being exploited?
If nothing changed for another year, would you stay?

Maybe it’s time to rethink your job, workload, or the story you’re telling yourself about what’s “normal.”

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

And yet, when employees set basic boundaries?

Now they’re “not a team player.” Now they “lack passion.” Now they’re “checked out.”

But where was that concern when they were burning out for nothing in return?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

The numbers make it clear.

Over 50% of UK workers have pulled back, not because they’re lazy, but because they see no path forward (Gallup, 2023)

In the US, nearly six in ten employees say they feel disengaged at work (Gallup, 2023)

People aren’t quitting. They’ve just stopped over-giving.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

So people start making adjustments.

Leaving on time.
Saying no to extra work with no extra pay.
Doing the job they signed up for - not the unspoken, unpaid extras.

They're not disengaged. Just done with being taken for granted.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

It doesn’t mean slacking off. It means doing what you’re paid for. Nothing else.

It’s realising that “above & beyond” only ever seems to flow one way. That hard work doesn’t always lead to promotions, just higher expectations.

That loyalty to a company doesn’t guarantee a return, just exhaustion.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

“They used to be so dedicated… now they’re just doing their job.”

Sounds like a problem. But what if it’s not?

What if it’s a response? A reset? A refusal to play a game that only ever benefits one side?

That’s Quiet Quitting. And it’s not the crisis everyone thinks it is.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Workplace Dynamics Playbook — WorkWell A must-have guide for both employees and leaders. Learn to navigate workplace challenges, advocate for yourself, and take action to create a fairer, more inclusive workplace. Includes strategies, scripts, and leadership insights.

Ever been rewarded with… more work? Let’s talk.

And if you want real strategies to push back, I put together something for you 👇🏽

Grab the FREE Workplace Dynamics Playbook here:

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

And if you’re in leadership?

Ask yourself: Are you rewarding top performers... or relying on them?

Because if the same people keep carrying the load while others coast, that’s not a work ethic issue.

That’s a leadership issue.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

So if this sounds familiar, here’s your move:

Stop being “the go-to” without being compensated for it.

Next time leadership asks you to take on more, say:
“Happy to discuss but how does this align with my career growth?”

Make them define it. Make the unspoken spoken.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Why? Because workplaces reward reliability with more work, not more money.

If you always deliver, they’ll always lean on you. And the more efficient you are? The more you get exploited.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

And who does it hit hardest?

Women and underrepresented professionals are more likely to get extra tasks dumped on them & less likely to get rewarded for it (McKinsey, 2023)

And high performers overall? They’re 20% more likely to be given additional tasks with no pay increase (HBR, 2022)

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

So the hardest workers get trapped.

You’re “too good” to lose, so they won’t promote you.
You’re “too reliable” to lighten the load, so they won’t support you.
You’re “too valuable” where you are, so they won’t let you grow.

It’s a cycle. And it keeps talent stuck.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

It happens when being good at your job means getting buried in it.

Not rewarded. Not promoted. Just relied on because leadership knows you’ll get it done.

Meanwhile? The ones who do the bare minimum? They get by just fine.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

“You’re doing an amazing job! So… here’s more work.”

No raise. No promotion. Just extra responsibilities while others skate by.

That’s not recognition. That’s Performance Punishment 🧵👇🏽

1 year ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Workplace Dynamics Playbook — WorkWell A must-have guide for both employees and leaders. Learn to navigate workplace challenges, advocate for yourself, and take action to create a fairer, more inclusive workplace. Includes strategies, scripts, and leadership insights.

Ever found yourself doing more ‘helping’ than actual career-building work? Let’s talk.

And if you want real strategies to shift the burden and reclaim your time, I put together something for you:

Grab the FREE Workplace Dynamics Playbook here:

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

And if you’re in leadership? Audit your team.

Who’s always asked to ‘help out’?
Who’s getting the high-profile, high-reward work?

If it’s not evenly spread, your system is broken.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

So, what’s the move?

If you’re always the one asked - push back.

Try:
👉🏽 “I did it last time - why don’t we rotate this time?”
👉🏽 “I’m focusing on [high-impact task] - who else can take this on?”

You don’t have to be the office caretaker.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

Because let’s be real:
“Who’s good at what” is often just code for who’s expected to serve.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

And it adds up:
• Women spend 200 more hrs/year on non-promotable work than men (HBR, 2022)
• Tasks that “keep the team running” work rarely translate into raises or promotions.

And when promotion time rolls around? The people who spent their time doing the work that actually gets rewarded move up.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

The only woman in the room? She’s asked to take notes

The junior employee? They’re always the one setting up the Zoom calls

The ‘helpful’ one? She’s organising birthdays, team socials, and cleaning up messes - literal & figurative

Meanwhile, others get to focus on high-impact, career-making work.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Every workplace runs on invisible labour.

Someone has to book the meeting rooms.
Someone has to take the team’s lunch order.
Someone has to remind everyone about deadlines.

But why is it always the same people?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0