Only way to activate my Merkabah, brother ✌🏽

Preview for my “An inconvenient study” debunking video. 😉 Go watch and like the whole thing on YouTube!

An Inconvenient Study | DEBUNKED YouTube video by Debunk the Funk with Dr. Wilson

I debunked the “An Inconvenient Study” documentary. It was bad. I had a bad time. But the video turned out great. May my sacrifice help you in your fight against anti-vaccine influencers. youtu.be/KhRZFw2DCBI?...

RFK Jr. is wrong here. They didn’t only look at prescriptions. They gathered data from standardized interviews during nurse and midwife visits during pregnancy, which is common in Denmark. bsky.app/profile/debu...

Why is this worth listening to @weldeiry.bsky.social? What is scientifically sound about it?

Instead of “no words” he could just condemn and scientifically criticize the people on that list. But he happily gave interviews to Maryanne from that list so 🤷🏽‍♂️

Excerpt from article interview of Paul Offit where he describes an interaction from 2005nwuth RFK Jr. "He made me a bad guy" Offit told The Philadelphi a Citizen last fall. "But I honestly don't think anybody is going to kill me. I certainly don't think they'll give me a heads-up first. They just want me to shut up." "And," he added, “fuck them."

@pauloffit.bsky.social is a total badass

You said nothing here and I didn’t attack you so I don’t know why you’re bringing that up. Did you read the references I provided? Anything to say about the experiments that address your concerns?

Could’ve been but no it was someone who purposely tried to push AI to support him as he pretended to have delusional beliefs.

I’ve seen AI try to convince a grown man that he was the smartest baby to ever be born.

Now, @weldeiry.bsky.social I’ve taken the time to respond to your explanation-less list of links with links of my own complete with descriptions of what each says and even the figures you can look at. Can you have an actual discussion with points/counterpoints and no reliance on AI?

Directly references and summarizes*

I cannot understand this blind trust and fascination with talking to AI.

[Sciences/Pharmacokinetics] Do nano-particles of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine cross the blood-brain barrier and infect your brain with mRNA (or will fritz your gonads)? 1. Introduction[EDIT: Updated the article on 07/05/2021 to reflect some updates on my analysis] I have recently seen some claims I considered moot resurfacing on social media: first that COVID-19 v…

This is an article that directly extended and summarized biodistribution and translation kinetics of COVID mRNA vaccines in mice. These tests were done and nothing concernign was found. It wasnt a “wait and see.” scientistabe.wordpress.com/2021/05/31/s...

Here is another that tested biodistibution and expression kinetics (figures 2 and 3) in mice. Again, nothing surprising. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

Here is a paper that tested the biodistribution of flu mRNA vaccine in mice. It was found to be similar to other vaccines (table 1). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

This is a particularly bad reference to post. I think you would be ashamed at the feedback if you presented this at a seminar in front of relevant experts. I’ll give you references that actually test persistence and biodistributikn of mRNA vaccines.

Are you…presenting an AI response to me as a presentation piece in a scientific discussion?

This is describing sequelae of COVID, not vaccines.

This review does reference a bizarre paper that does find PP peptides unique to the vaccine spike long after vaccination but does not show persistent vaccine. These results are best explained by follicular dendritic cells holding onto antigen.

Yale COVID vaccine syndrome study YouTube video by Debunk the Funk with Dr. Wilson

This study also did not demonstrate persistent vaccine. m.youtube.com/watch?v=ehS-...

None of the peptides detected in this paper are unique to the vaccine-encoded spike. They did not rule out WT spike as a source for their peptide measurements. Finding unique immune cells holding onto antigen also is not akin to “vaccine persistence.”

APMIS | Medical Research Journal | Wiley Online Library In Denmark, vaccination against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been with the Pfizer-BioNTech (BTN162b2) or the Moderna (mRNA-1273) mRNA vaccines. Patients with chro....

This is a review by McCullough, an anti-vaccine proponent who misrepresents data. For persistence of mRNA, they reference a paper that just found fragment a in certain tissues. This group did sequencing & found only non-biological fragments after a few weeks. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

Weird. Again, if you want to talk data @weldeiry.bsky.social, let’s do it and not be facetious.

Really, @weldeiry.bsky.social? Why?

He stopped responding which I take to mean he doesn’t want to have a conversation about data 🤷🏽‍♂️

Memes vs. data

My March reading month. One big stinker, lots of enjoyable reads, and some fantastic standouts!