Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Drew Bailey

I think Nathan Fielder did this.

3 weeks ago 3 0 0 0
Post image

New paper: Morocco's Pioneer Middle Schools—a government-led whole-school reform—improved socioemotional skills, tripled year-on-year learning, reduced dropout ~1/3.

"Beyond Basics"

w/ Campos Quintero, El Amrani Mida, Glewwe, Kumar, and Lépine

de-barros.com/publication/...

@cega-uc.bsky.social

3 weeks ago 17 7 0 1

Don’t Do Difference In Differences (DDDID), cheers, guido

1 month ago 77 15 3 9
Post image

Excited to share a new paper with @jfischman, just accepted at JEL.

We argue that empirical research tends to be biased and overconfident due to a weakness in the dominant econometric framework: insufficient attention paid to humans “in the loop” with the research process. 1/

1 month ago 49 14 1 0

In my experience, striving to carve nature at its joints using Likert scales is a common phase that curious and creative students go through. Maybe this reading should go at the end of every course unit on clustering?

2 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

📢 #EdWorkingPapers: Tyler Watts, @emmarosehart.bsky.social, & @drewhalbailey.bsky.social analyze 87 RCTs & find that fadeout is common across most programs. Intervention characteristics explain only a small share of differences in persistence.

📄 bit.ly/4aGrXY4

2 months ago 5 4 0 0
Preview
Why Do Most Education Interventions Fade Out Over Time? There is evidence both to explain and complicate the “fadeout effect”

Why do educational intervention impacts fade? Isn't catch-up a good thing? Are sleeper effects real? Does fadeout mean failure?

@drewhalbailey.bsky.social, Tyler Watts, and I address these questions & more in an EdNext piece & 4 new working papers!

www.educationnext.org/why-do-most-...

2 months ago 12 4 1 1

Thanks Brent; I liked yours too!

2 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Replying to Brent on cross lagged panel models Last week, Brent Roberts blogged on “The Inconceivability of the CLPM and RI-CLPM”.

Replying to @bwroberts.bsky.social on cross-lagged panel models

open.substack.com/pub/drewhalb...

2 months ago 10 2 1 0

Person at talk translating all model descriptions into formal equations is the academic talk version of the person filling out the scorecard at a baseball game.

3 months ago 2 0 0 0

Named for Patterson Hood? Same hair I guess.

3 months ago 1 0 1 0
Preview
For First Time in Decades, Child Deaths Will Rise This Year Almost a quarter of a million more children around the world are projected to die in 2025 than in 2024.

This fetid landmark, this historical stain on humanity is primarily due to the stunningly reckless obliteration of America's foreign assistance agency earlier this year.

Led by the richest man on earth. In secret, on a weekend. With zero analysis or discussion of its catastrophic impacts.

4 months ago 1398 753 4 63

Thanks, Ruben.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Fig. 3. Effects of the intervention. In (a) are shown effects 7 months after the intervention; in (b) are shown interaction effects 7 months after the intervention. Models show the effects of the intervention on expressive-language skills in the grade 1 posttest, with an interaction between expressive-language skills in the pretest and after the intervention. Standardized coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) are shown, except for the intervention dummy variable and the interaction where y-standardized values are indicated. Rectangles and circles contain observed variables and latent variables, respectively. Solid arrows point to significant regression or factor loadings (arrows from latent variables to their observed indicators); the arrow with dotted lines shows nonsignificant regression. The interaction (Fig. 3b) is illustrated by the arrow from the black circle to expressive language in the posttest. **p < .01.

Fig. 3. Effects of the intervention. In (a) are shown effects 7 months after the intervention; in (b) are shown interaction effects 7 months after the intervention. Models show the effects of the intervention on expressive-language skills in the grade 1 posttest, with an interaction between expressive-language skills in the pretest and after the intervention. Standardized coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) are shown, except for the intervention dummy variable and the interaction where y-standardized values are indicated. Rectangles and circles contain observed variables and latent variables, respectively. Solid arrows point to significant regression or factor loadings (arrows from latent variables to their observed indicators); the arrow with dotted lines shows nonsignificant regression. The interaction (Fig. 3b) is illustrated by the arrow from the black circle to expressive language in the posttest. **p < .01.

Fig. 4. Long-term effects of the intervention on expressive-language skills. Model showing the effect of the intervention on expressive-language skills in the grade 4 posttest. Standardized coefficients (with 95% CIs) are shown, except for the intervention dummy variable where y-standardized values (equal to Cohen’s d) are indicated. Rectangles and circles contain observed variables and latent variables, respectively. Solid arrows point to significant regression or factor loadings (arrows from latent variables to their observed indicators); arrows with dotted lines show nonsignificant regression. **p < .01.

Fig. 4. Long-term effects of the intervention on expressive-language skills. Model showing the effect of the intervention on expressive-language skills in the grade 4 posttest. Standardized coefficients (with 95% CIs) are shown, except for the intervention dummy variable where y-standardized values (equal to Cohen’s d) are indicated. Rectangles and circles contain observed variables and latent variables, respectively. Solid arrows point to significant regression or factor loadings (arrows from latent variables to their observed indicators); arrows with dotted lines show nonsignificant regression. **p < .01.

Fadeout of cognitive training remains one of the more replicable
findings in psychology in this preregistered study of 300 preschool children. Well-done study with a 4 year follow up. The language gains either faded or the control group caught up.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....

4 months ago 46 19 2 1

Totally! Many hot topics should be hot!

5 months ago 1 0 0 0

I think the “why most published research findings are false” paper suggests this as one of the heuristics for identifying “false” findings.

5 months ago 1 0 1 0

So hard! When there is no cross-lagged effect in this data generating model, RI-CLPM estimates one, but when there *is* one effect, the ARTS model doesn't! Not sure the paper bears much on whether cross-lagged effects are rare, but def on our ability to use these models without external info.

6 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
OSF

Interested in models used to estimate lagged effects in panel data? We (@rebiweidmann.bsky.social, Hyewon Yang) have a new paper looking at patterns of stability and their implications for bias and model choice: osf.io/preprints/ps... [1/x]

7 months ago 25 12 1 4
Preview
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

I really like this paper dealing with the problem of “mischievous” responding in longitudinal panel data, by @joecimpian.bsky.social

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....

7 months ago 2 0 1 0

Dag makhani: Causal inference and Indian cuisine

7 months ago 2 0 0 0

Collider effect in the real world!

7 months ago 2 0 1 0

Like, the effect of dropping a bouncing ball on the velocity of the ball over time is a weird oscillating function?

8 months ago 1 0 0 0

About 2/3 of the posts on this platform linking to the recent NYT article on null findings from Baby’s First Years have this reaction. You can search the headline and verify yourself!

www.nytimes.com/2025/07/28/u...

8 months ago 2 0 0 0

I used Paige’s first book in a class students with a wide range of previous exposure to and attitudes about behavior genetics, and they all seem to find it very interesting. Will probably try this one too!

8 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image
8 months ago 1 0 0 0
OSF

Random Intercepts and Slopes in Longitudinal Models: When Are They "Good" and "Bad" Controls?

or

Illusory Traits 2: Revenge of the Slopes

Led by Siling Guo, with Nicolas Hübner, Steffen Zitzmann, Martin Hecht, and Kou Murayama.

Comments welcome!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

8 months ago 12 5 0 0
Preview
Reviewer notes: So you’re interested in “lagged effects.” In some fields, researchers who end up with time series of two variables of interest (X and Y) like to analyze (reciprocal) lagged effects between them. Does X affect Y at a later point in time, and d...

New blog post! Let's say you've measured two variables repeatedly and want to investigate how one affects the other over time. Here are some recommendations for how to do that well.

www.the100.ci/2025/06/25/r...

9 months ago 210 60 14 3
Advertisement

Although field-specific authorship norms probably mostly just reflect the values of people in the field, I also think they can affect those values too. This seems like a good example! (I have some guesses about unintended consequences of tiny authorship teams too, btw.)

9 months ago 1 0 0 0
APA PsycNet

6) LCGAs never replicate across datasets or in the same dataset. They usually just produce the salsa pattern (Hi/med/low) or the cats cradle (Hi/low/increasing/decreasing).

This has misled entire fields (see all of George Bonnano's work on resilience, for example).

psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/201...

10 months ago 28 4 6 2
Treemap showing measurement fragmentation across subfields in psychology. Hill-Shannon Diversity 𝐷=1626.05

Treemap showing measurement fragmentation across subfields in psychology. Hill-Shannon Diversity 𝐷=1626.05

How often measures in the APA PsycTESTS database are (re)used according to the APA PsycInfo database: rarely, the majority are never reused.

How often measures in the APA PsycTESTS database are (re)used according to the APA PsycInfo database: rarely, the majority are never reused.

Our fragmentation index (Hill-Shannon diversity) over time across subdisciplines shows fragmentation rising.

Our fragmentation index (Hill-Shannon diversity) over time across subdisciplines shows fragmentation rising.

Our paper "A fragmented field" has just been accepted at AMPPS. We find it's not just you, psychology is really getting more confusing (construct and measure fragmentation is rising).
We updated the preprint with the (substantial) revision, please check it out.
osf.io/preprints/ps...

10 months ago 155 61 1 4