The EOSC EU Node
openplato.eu/eosceunode
open-science-cloud.ec.europa.eu
@openaire.bsky.social webinar tomorrow 02 July at 14:00 CEST bit.ly/43W7udq

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (9/9) - "What is the name of the @ec.europa.eu platform providing services such as large file transfer, virtual machines, file synch and share, interactive notebooks, etc.?"
- EOSC EU Node
OR
- EuroCloud Nexus
@openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

TRUE - #OpenResearchEurope will automatically upload your work on #ZENODO. You're not required to publish in it but the advantage is that it guarantees compliancy with #OpenAccess requirements and removes the step of self-archiving on a trusted repository - @openaire.bsky.social bit.ly/43W7udq

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (8/9) TRUE or FALSE - "If I publish in @OpenResearch_EU (EC's publishing platform), I don't need to upload a version of my publication on a repository because it will be automatically done for me" - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

TRUE & FALSE - trick question, you do have to submit a DMP but by M6. So start writing your DMP from the start of your project, don't underestimate the time it takes, especially getting information from all the different partners - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (7/9) TRUE or FALSE - "I need to submit a Data Management Plan (#DMP) within the first year of the start of the project (by M12)" #FAIRdata #RDM - @OpenAIRE_eu webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

FALSE - one of the valid justification for not opening your data is if you produce commercially valuable data and opening it would undermine its exploitation or other results (e.g. endanger trade-secrets), or make IP protection of results more difficult - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

FALSE - most publishers' platform aren't considered as a trusted repository or follow all the FAIR principles to make data available (e.g. DOI, licence, metadata standards). Make sure to always upload on a compliant repository (e.g. Zenodo), even if you shared it elsewhere

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (6/9) TRUE or FALSE - "I must deposit and make my data open immediately, even if it is commercially valuable and could have Intellectual Property Rights applied to it" ? #RDM #EuropeanIPRHelpdesk - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

Zero-Embargo Green Open Access: A Look Back at the First 18 Months | ACS Publications Chemistry Blog It’s been just over a year and a half since ACS Publications introduced a new and more accessible route to enable immediate author self-archiving of research articles. In this post, we look at how it’...

"Read and Green" - a more affordable route to immediate open access? axial.acs.org/open-science...

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (5/9) TRUE or FALSE - "My publisher asks me to share the underlying data with my publication. I don't need to upload the data on a repository as it will be accessible on the publisher's website"? - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

For PsyArXiv just remember it's a preprint server so make sure you update your manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed version after it's published

TRUE - The journal's website, your profile page on your institutional website, a social networking site (e.g. Academia, ResearchGate) aren't considered as trusted repositories. Check doi.org/10.5281/zeno... for a list - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (4/9) TRUE or FALSE - "Depositing your publication on your profile page on your institutional website doesn't comply with the #OA rule because it isn't considered as a trusted repository"? - @OpenAIRE_eu webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

FALSE - The requirement to make your publications available in OA only applies to peer-reviewed work. You do not have to deposit on a repository, but it is strongly recommended so your work is as visible and accessible as possible - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (3/9) TRUE or FALSE - "If I publish a work that isn't peer-reviewed (e.g. some conference proceedings, technical reports, opinion pieces), I still need to comply with the #OpenAccess rules." - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

TRUE - #MSCA projects differ from the Horizon Europe policy in that APCs/BPCs can be covered under the grant. There are no restrictions in where you can publish and which OA costs can be covered - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq - #OpenAccess

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (2/9) TRUE or FALSE - "For Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions projects, I can use my grant to cover APCs in hybrid journals" - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq - #MSCA #OpenAccess

Manuscript versions in the publishing cycle: the draft at submission is called the pre-print; next is the peer-reviewing process with cycles of revisions; the accepted version for publication is called the Author Accepted Manuscript (or postprint); the publisher does the copy-editing and type-setting; at the time of publication this last version is called the Version of Record

You do however, whatever the venue, need to make the Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) and/or the Version of Record (VoR) available in #OpenAccess on a trusted repository immediately upon publication, with a #CCBY licence applied

FALSE - there are no restrictions set by #HorizonEU as to where you can publish. That includes hybrid or closed journals. The only restriction is financial, your grant only covers costs in full-OA. APCs in hybrids will have to be covered independently - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (1/9) TRUE or FALSE - "I am required to publish in a full-OA journal or platform (hybrid journals are not compliant, apart for some exceptions)" #OpenAccess #HorizonEurope

@openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/43W7udq

FALSE - not addressing mandatory practices will lower your score (e.g. publications, data, information about outputs/tools/instruments to validate/re-use results and data​), but adding recommended practices can only increase your score, never lower it - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/4hXzwdX

Horizon Europe Open Science requirements in practice Have any doubts or questions about your obligations as a Horizon Europe (HE) grant holder in terms of Open Access to publications and Research Data Managem...

FALSE - not addressing mandatory practices will lower your score (e.g. publications, data, information about outputs/tools/instruments to validate/re-use results and data​), but adding recommended practices can only increase your score, never lower it - OpenAIRE webinar bit.ly/4hXzwdX

FALSE - one of the valid justification for not opening your data is if you produce commercially valuable data and opening it would undermine its exploitation or other results (e.g. endanger trade-secrets), or make IP protection of results more difficult - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/4hXzwdX

FALSE - one of the valid justification for not opening your data is if you produce commercially valuable data and opening it would undermine its exploitation or other results (e.g. endanger trade-secrets), or make IP protection of results more difficult - @openaire.bsky.social webinar bit.ly/4hXzwdX

OpenAIRE Training - Open Science in Horizon Europe. Requirements in practice, compliance tips, tools to support. 14 March 2025, 12:00 CET. Register now.

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (6/6) TRUE or FALSE - "In the grant proposal, my score will be lowered if I do not address the other recommended #OpenScience practices (e.g. #CitizenScience, #preregistration)" ? - @openaire.bsky.social webinar 14 March at 12:00 CET bit.ly/4hXzwdX

Do you know your #HorizonEU requirements? (5/6) TRUE or FALSE - "I must deposit and make my data open immediately, even if it is commercially valuable and could have Intellectual Property Rights applied to it" ? #RDM @IPRHelpdesk - @openaire.bsky.social webinar 14 March 12:00 CET bit.ly/4hXzwdX

FALSE - most publishers' platform aren't considered a trusted repository and/or follow all of the FAIR principles to make your data available (e.g. attributing a DOI, applying CC0 or CC-BY licences). Make sure to always upload on a compliant repository (e.g. Zenodo), even if you shared it elsewhere

FALSE - most publishers' platform aren't considered a trusted repository and/or follow all of the FAIR principles to make your data available (e.g. attributing a DOI, applying CC0 or CC-BY licences). Make sure to always upload on a compliant repository (e.g. Zenodo), even if you shared it elsewhere