Figure 3:Principal component analysis (PCA) of bio.tools entries with a GitHub repository basedon the numbers of contributors, forks (and network count), commits, pulls, releases, open issues,subscribers, watchers, stargazers and the average time to close issues. The colors represent thebio.toolsmaturitylevel, i.e.,Emerging,MatureorLegacy.

"Bidirectional bridge: GitHub ⇄ bio.tools" https://doi.org/10.37044/osf.io/8ktd6_v1

"Here, we describe the tooling for a bidirectional bridge between the software developmentplatform GitHub and the ELIXIR bio.tools registry of life sciences software tools […]

[Original post on fediscience.org]

Screenshot of the "Number of articles with CiTO-annotated citations by year" panel, showing articles with explicit CiTO annotations (so, as part of the articles themselves!), first in 2010 (you should know that by now), and then Journal of Cheminformatics preprints since 2020 (3, 8, 5, 4, 2, 2, yeah, not increasing) and BioHackrXiv since 2022 (2, 11, 13, 10). With BioHackathon Europe and BioHackathon Germany still taking place, we should be able to set a new high.

Another good year for explicit CiTO annotations! https://scholia.toolforge.org/cito/

Thanks to all Journal of Cheminformatics and BioHackrXiv authors!!!

Looking forward to the #BH25EU and #BH25DE preprints with CiTO annotations! Help us set a new record ;) […]

[Original post on mastodon.social]

Original post on mastodon.social

I hope to follow a good bit of the #BH25EU this year. I just signed up for virtual attendenc. My primary will be "Project 1: A shape-driven visual interface to integrate heterogeneous biomedical databases into knowledge graphs" by Javier, Tooba, and Yojana […]