New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #187: Response to Motion
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
1
0
0
Hashtag
#CL71481149
Advertisement · 728 × 90
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #186: Order on Motion
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
2
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #185: Motion - Miscellaneous
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: Non-Party Media Organizations' Motion to Intervene 164 is GRANTED. Media Organizations request intervention "for the limited purpose of asserting the right of the press and the public to access court records and certain records produced in discovery in this matter." Motion to Intervene, ECF 164 at 5. The Motion to Intervene is timely because only several months have passed since the challenged materials were designated confidential. San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Ct.--N. Dist. (San Jose), 187 F.3d 1096, 1101 (9th Cir. 1999) ("Indeed, delays measured in years have been tolerated where an intervenor is pressing the public's right of access to judicial records."). And because Media Organizations only seek "intervention for the purposes of challenging confidentiality orders," they satisfy "the common fact or law requirement." Jessup v. Luther, 227 F.3d 993, 997 (7th Cir. 2000); see Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 474 (9th Cir. 1992) ("There is no reason to require such a strong nexus of fact or law when a party seeks to intervene only for the purpose of modifying a protective order."); see also Cosgrove v. Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 770 F. App'x 793, 795 (9th Cir. 2019) ("A third party seeking permissive intervention purely to unseal a court record does not need to demonstrate independent jurisdiction or a common question of law or fact."). Consistent with this Court's previous scheduling order 168, Defendants' response to Media Organizations' Motion to Unseal 165 is due on April 15, 2026. Media Organizations' reply is due on April 22, 2026. Ordered on 4/8/2026 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #183: ORDER: Non-Party Media Organizations' Motion to Intervene 164 is GRANTED. Media Organizations request intervention "for the limited purpose of asserting…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New minute entry in Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment): Order on Motion to Intervene
View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #182: Reply to Motion
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: This Court has reviewed the parties' briefing on Plaintiff State of Oregon's Motion to Modify Protective Order 166 and ORDERS supplemental briefing from the parties. In the Ninth Circuit, "the burden of proof will remain with the party seeking protection when the protective order was a stipulated order and no party had made a 'good cause' showing." Phillips ex rel. Ests. of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1211 n.1 (9th Cir. 2002). "A party asserting good cause bears the burden, for each particular document it seeks to protect, of showing that specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted." Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003). Defendants' leading argument is that Plaintiff has the burden of proof and fails to demonstrate good cause to modify the Stipulated Protective Order 88 . See Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Protective Order, ECF 177 at 5-8. This Court requests supplemental briefing from Defendants addressing what "specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted" "for each particular document" or protected material that Defendants seek to protect. Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1130; see Fierro Cordero v. Stemilt AG Servs., LLC, 142 F.4th 1201, 1207 (9th Cir. 2025) ("Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples or articulated reasoning, do not satisfy the Rule 26(c) test." (citation modified)). In particular, Defendants should explain what "specific prejudice or harm" would result from allowing Plaintiff's law enforcement agencies to access the protected discovery only for law enforcement purposes. Defendants' supplemental brief is due on April 10, 2026, and is limited to 10 pages. Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' supplemental brief is due on April 17, 2026, and is also limited to 10 pages. Ordered on 4/3/2026 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) (Entered: 04/03/2026)
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #180: ORDER: This Court has reviewed the parties' briefing on Plaintiff State of Oregon's Motion to Modify Protective Order 166 and ORDERS supplemental briefing…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New minute entry in Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment): 1 - Scheduling
View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #179: Withdrawal of Attorney
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
1
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #178: Reply to Motion
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #176: Response in Opposition to Motion
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #177: Response in Opposition to Motion
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: Defendants' response to non-party media organizations' Motion to Intervene 164 is due March 24, 2026. If this Court grants the Motion to Intervene, then Defendants will have seven days from the Court's order to respond to the Motion to Unseal 165 . Defendants' response to Plaintiff State of Oregon's Motion to Modify Protective Order 166 is also due March 24, 2026. Ordered on 3/10/2026 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) (Entered: 03/10/2026)
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #168: ORDER: Defendants' response to non-party media organizations' Motion to Intervene 164 is due March 24, 2026. If this Court grants the Motion to Intervene,…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
New minute entry in Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment): 1 - Scheduling
View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
Thumbnail of page 1 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 2 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 3 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 4 of the PDF linked above.
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #166: Motion - Miscellaneous
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
2
1
0
0
Thumbnail of page 1 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 2 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 3 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 4 of the PDF linked above.
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #164: Intervene
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
2
0
0
0
Thumbnail of page 1 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 2 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 3 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 4 of the PDF linked above.
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #165: Unseal Document
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: Based on the parties' jointly submitted Proposed Order, ECF 162, this Court enters the attached Order. Signed on 3/2/2026 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (gw) (Entered: 03/02/2026)
Thumbnail of page 1 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 2 of the PDF linked above.
Thumbnail of page 3 of the PDF linked above.
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #163: ORDER: Based on the parties' jointly submitted Proposed Order, ECF 162, this Court enters the attached Order. Signed on 3/2/2026 by Judge Karin J.…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
1
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #162: Notice
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: This Court has received and reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report 160 . The parties agree that Counts II, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint 58 should be dismissed without prejudice. This Court ORDERS the parties to file a proposed order of dismissal by February 27, 2026, which includes language retaining this Court's jurisdiction over matters related to the outstanding confidentiality issues and enforcement of this Court's Permanent Injunction 147 as discussed in the Joint Status Report. The parties state that they have discussed, but have not yet resolved, two issues relating to document and witness confidentiality. If the parties reach an agreement on these issues, they may include the terms of such agreement in a proposed order modifying the terms of their prior stipulated Protective Order 88 . Otherwise, if the parties remain at an impasse, this Court ORDERS the parties to provide briefing as follows: Because Plaintiffs are moving for disclosure, their motion, not to exceed 15 pages, is due on March 6, 2026. Defendants' response, not to exceed 15 pages, is due on March 13, 2026; and Plaintiffs' reply, not to exceed 5 pages, is due on March 20, 2026. Ordered on 2/23/2026 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #161: ORDER: This Court has received and reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report 160 . The parties agree that Counts II, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint 58…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
1
0
0
New minute entry in Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment): 1 - Scheduling
View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #160: Status Report
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #159: Withdrawal of Attorney
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: In light of the Ninth Circuit's issuance of a mandate dismissing Defendants' appeal of this Court's Partial Final Judgment 147, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report addressing whether any further issues remain or whether this case can be dismissed or otherwise closed. The parties' joint status report is due on or before February 20, 2026. Ordered on 2/18/2026 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) (Entered: 02/18/2026)
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #158: ORDER: In light of the Ninth Circuit's issuance of a mandate dismissing Defendants' appeal of this Court's Partial Final Judgment 147, the parties are…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
7
2
0
1
New minute entry in Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment): 1 - Scheduling
View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
0
0
0
The entry's text: ORDER: This Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Stay Remaining Claims, ECF 156 . This Court VACATES its previous order setting Defendants' deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint on January 5, 2026, ECF 152 . Consistent with Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for a stay, any further litigation of Plaintiffs' remaining claims is stayed until the Ninth Circuit resolves Defendants' consolidated appeals or until further order of this Court. Ordered on January 5, 2026, by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) (Entered: 01/05/2026)
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #157: ORDER: This Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Stay Remaining Claims, ECF 156 . This Court VACATES its previous order setting Defendants'…
[full entry below 👇]
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
2
0
0
New minute entry in Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment): Order on Motion for Stay
View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #156: Stay
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
2
1
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #155: 0seal - Seal Docket Entry and/or Document ONLY use with other selection AND Exhibit
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
1
1
0
0
New filing: "Oregon v. Trump (national guard deployment)"
Doc #153: File Document Under Seal
Download PDF | View Full Case
#CL71481149
0
0
0
0