Breakthrough Institute filled AGAINST Our Children's Trust?!?
I think that's disgusting.
Ted Nordhaus took 10 years to earn a BA in History. 🤦🏼♀️
He's not qualified to make scientific statements.
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
😂 They can't even spell "you're" correctly.
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely 🤓
Most disturbing to me, "...In 2018, Victor filed a report [13] as an expert witness on behalf of the federal government in the Juliana v. United States[14] climate case..."
He testified AGAINST the youth!
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_G...
6/
It is so important to #ChooseYourSourcesWisely!
Re: The Breakthrough Institute
"Many environmental scientists and academics disagree with its environmental positions. Critics claim the Institute advocates right-wing ideas that would negatively impact climate change."
#TBI
#Ecomodernism
#Ecomodernists
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
Even Bill Gates graduated from high school.
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
We still have an NRC, right? 😮💨🤦🏼♀️
Hoping new nuclear will be stopped.
We don't need it with its risks, waste, high cost, long build time,...
#PhaseOutNuclearEnergy
Isodope, Isabelle Boemke, is a high school drop out, not an expert on nuclear energy.
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
George, where did you get your nuclear engineering degree?
How many years have you worked in the nuclear industry?
That's right.
Your degree is in zoology.
Zero years in the nuclear industry.
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
Thank you Arnie Gundersen! #Whistleblowers
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_...
Jessica Lovering also has experience with fossil fuel funded Nuclear Innovation Alliance.
I'm so tired of nuclear shills!
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
bsky.app/profile/suzw...
Webpage: "However, a similar, better-phrased ad hominem argument could be reasonable under similar circumstances. Consider, for example, the following discussion: "Alex: I read a lot about this theory, and I think that it’s definitely wrong. "Bob: how much expertise do you have with this field, though? As far as I know, you have no formal credentials, which makes me wary about trusting your opinion as opposed to the opinion of the experts who proposed this theory in the first place. "Unlike the previous example, this ad hominem argument is reasonable, rather than fallacious, since the person using the ad hominem argument targets it at the actual source of the opposing argument, and phrases the ad hominem argument in a way that clearly demonstrates why it’s relevant to the discussion."
2/2 Be wary of the opinions of non-expert nuclear bros.
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
I'd listen to Michael Barnard, not nuclear bro miners.
"Michaux makes so many compounding mistakes that it’s remarkable anyone takes him remotely seriously."
#ChooseYourSourcesWisely
cleantechnica.com/2023/07/04/h...
