*For the lulz #Anthropic #ClaudeLeak

The Fatal Human Error: How One Manual Step Leaked Claude Code to the World A widespread leak of the Claude Code source code circulated among developers after MAP files were accidentally included in a production package, exposing large amounts of unobfuscated internal data. Anthropic issued DMCA takedown notices that led GitHub to remove over 8,100 repositories but acknowledged complete eradication is unlikely, with principal architect...

A human error led to the accidental inclusion of MAP files in a production build, leaking Claude Code source revealing unobfuscated internal data. Anthropic issued DMCA takedowns but full removal remains unlikely. #ClaudeLeak #CodeExposure #USA

Whoa! A massive Claude leak spilled 512k+ lines, exposing a Tamagotchi‑style always‑on AI pet. Peek the code, see the quirky conversational agent and what KAIROS is cooking. Dive in! #ClaudeLeak #AnthropicPet #KAIROS

🔗 aidailypost.com/news/claude-...

Gergely Orosz: This is either brilliant or scary: Anthropic accidentally leaked the TypeScript source code of Claude Code (which is closed source). Repos sharing the source are taken down with DMA - as they share copyrighted code that they are not allowed to do so. This is all very standard until this point. BUT where things take a twist: this one repo rewrote the code using Python, and so it violates no copyright & cannot be taken down with DMA requests! The brilliance: copyright does not protect certain kinds of derived works. Rewriting TypeScript code in Python means copyright probably doesn't apply...? The scary thing: it can be done in trivial amount of time, with Al agents. This one was done with Codex. This can be done not just for this specific codebase, but any codebase. So what happens with copyright? Will it evolve with Al, or be stuck pre-Al?

If any company is a good one to test on what happens: it is Anthropic. Al labs greatly benefit from derived works not being considered as copyrightable: this is one of the reasons they can freely train on copyrighted work, after all. This repo is doing the same: taking copyrighted code by Anthropic (that Anthropic publicly shared!) and deriving it, transforming into another, common programming language. You can imagine Anthropic being in a pickle right now: 1. Do they just leave this, and look the other way? Ignoring that it's not exactly fair to transform their code and leave it up there, not wanting to poke the bear. 2. Or do they risk it and poke the bear: claim that claim copyright applies because the work is very clearly derived and mimics the original... but this could be bad for their own business in much bigger ways! E.g. imagine regulation coming into play that bans this (transforming code from one language to another.) Claude Code and other tools would have to refuse this kind of generation - and become a lot less useful. Lawsuits against Al labs could spike against labs like Anthropic and others. The losses from #2 could eclipse having this repo stay up. And you can bet it would be a high-profile case: an Al lab arguing copyright needs to be updated and explanded thanks to Al agents! So my bet is #1 happens. Not the interest of an Al lab to expand copyright protections to derived work cretated by an LLM... The repo: https://Inkd.in/eGzp_DSZ

Interesting re: #ClaudeLeak #Claude #AI

www.linkedin.com/posts/gergel...