Appeals panel hears dispute over $710,000 and whether a constructive trust was proper in Chicago Title v. Esig At oral argument, Chicago Title told the appellate panel that $710,000 deposited in the court registry came from a fraudulent loan and that David Esig and his attorney had notice; Esig's counsel argued the record does not support imputed knowledge or the level of wrongdoing Baker v. Leonard requires.

A fierce legal battle unfolds as attorneys clash over whether a $710,000 constructive trust was justified in a case involving alleged fraud and hidden knowledge.

Click to read more!

#WA #CitizenPortal #ConstructiveTrust #EquityInjustice #LegalFraud