Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#Eriugena
Advertisement · 728 × 90
During the long-lasting and momentous process of the hellenizing of Christianity, the conceptuality of Greek metaphysics substantially conditioned the dogmatic formalization of Christian truth, whether consciously or unconsciously. Thus, we find many theological tenets which only through philosophical reflection and theoretical form came to be what they are, or at least through philosophy gained a convincing character for faith as a whole. This is particularly true for the question of creation as the unfolding of the divine Will and Goodness, for the ideas as the structures of divine Thought, for the concept of God as identical with absolute Being in the sense of a reflexively moved immutability, for the concept of a hypostatic unity of God and man in Christ, for will and freedom, arché and logos, eternity, time and history, and the issue of the approach towards knowledge of God through affirmative, symbolic, and negative theology. None of these theological tenets is more intensively determined by, and so deeply interwoven with, philosophical concepts and theories than the Trinity. Its intelligibility depends upon more or less developed concepts of unity, singleness, simplicity, and also on the three-ness that indicates a characteristic difference in the unity, but which nonetheless should not be understood as numerical in the mathematical sense. It also involves conceptions of difference and characteristic individuality as elements in the unity and, at the same time, the inseparability, nondistinctness, or even “equality” through which the characteristic three form the Trinity in itself: “...in his igitur tribus quam sit... inseparabilis distinctio, et tamen distinctio, videat qui potest.”? 
No less decisive for the reflexive form of the Trinity is the ontological meaning of the concept of relation which founds and carries the reciprocal interpenetration of tri--and un-ity: Trinity as a correlative unity which is itself only through self-relatedness. Such a unity, …

During the long-lasting and momentous process of the hellenizing of Christianity, the conceptuality of Greek metaphysics substantially conditioned the dogmatic formalization of Christian truth, whether consciously or unconsciously. Thus, we find many theological tenets which only through philosophical reflection and theoretical form came to be what they are, or at least through philosophy gained a convincing character for faith as a whole. This is particularly true for the question of creation as the unfolding of the divine Will and Goodness, for the ideas as the structures of divine Thought, for the concept of God as identical with absolute Being in the sense of a reflexively moved immutability, for the concept of a hypostatic unity of God and man in Christ, for will and freedom, arché and logos, eternity, time and history, and the issue of the approach towards knowledge of God through affirmative, symbolic, and negative theology. None of these theological tenets is more intensively determined by, and so deeply interwoven with, philosophical concepts and theories than the Trinity. Its intelligibility depends upon more or less developed concepts of unity, singleness, simplicity, and also on the three-ness that indicates a characteristic difference in the unity, but which nonetheless should not be understood as numerical in the mathematical sense. It also involves conceptions of difference and characteristic individuality as elements in the unity and, at the same time, the inseparability, nondistinctness, or even “equality” through which the characteristic three form the Trinity in itself: “...in his igitur tribus quam sit... inseparabilis distinctio, et tamen distinctio, videat qui potest.”? No less decisive for the reflexive form of the Trinity is the ontological meaning of the concept of relation which founds and carries the reciprocal interpenetration of tri--and un-ity: Trinity as a correlative unity which is itself only through self-relatedness. Such a unity, …

It's not often you come across a single page in a book of philosophy that has as much going on as this one has.
From 'Unity and Trinity in East and West, by Werner Beierwaltes #Eriugena

1 0 0 0

God, ‘𝙏𝒉𝙚𝒐𝙨,’ is correctly understood as “Runner,” for He runs into all things and does not stand still at all, but fills everything by running.

- #Eriugena, ‘ #𝙋𝒆𝙧𝒊𝙥𝒉𝙮𝒔𝙚𝒐𝙣’ I

0 0 0 0
Carmina qui quondam (excerpt) - Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy I:1
Carmina qui quondam (excerpt) - Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy I:1 YouTube video by Cambridge University

Thinking about the library of Alexandria is nice and all but sometimes I can't get out of my mind the idea of #AlfredtheGreat and John Scotus #Eriugena singing #Boethius's 'Consolations of #Philosophy' set to music as many were back then ...

youtu.be/PwAKPIUKAyM

1 0 2 0
Dr Anne Marie D'Arcy
@dramdarcy

Then there's Eriugena: 'Bacchus abest siccis Scottorum faucibus aestu': Bacchus has left the building and the gullets of the Irish are dry. 

Cf Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Carmina, ed. and trans. Michael W. Herren, SLH 12 (Dublin, 1993), p. 105. 

Ezra Pound and Joyce liked this one.

7:48 PM Nov 12, 2017

Dr Anne Marie D'Arcy @dramdarcy Then there's Eriugena: 'Bacchus abest siccis Scottorum faucibus aestu': Bacchus has left the building and the gullets of the Irish are dry. Cf Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Carmina, ed. and trans. Michael W. Herren, SLH 12 (Dublin, 1993), p. 105. Ezra Pound and Joyce liked this one. 7:48 PM Nov 12, 2017

#Eriugena the poet, from @dramdarcy.bsky.social in the days before flames engulfed the hellsite.

0 1 0 0
https://oldeuropeanculture.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-faceless-one.html

https://oldeuropeanculture.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-faceless-one.html

𝑫𝙚𝒖𝙨 𝙞𝒕𝙖𝒒𝙪𝒆 𝒏𝙚𝒔𝙘𝒊𝙩 𝙨𝒆 𝒒𝙪𝒊𝙙 𝙚𝒔𝙩 𝙦𝒖𝙞𝒂 𝒏𝙤𝒏 𝒆𝙨𝒕 𝒒𝙪𝒊𝙙.

God does not know of Himself what He is because He is not a ‘what.'

– John Scotus #Eriugena, ' #Periphyseon' II (589b)

1 1 0 1

Love is the bond and fetter by which the totality of all things is connected in inexpressible affection and indissoluble unity.

- John Scottus #Eriugena

5 1 0 0

Human nature is the workshop of all things.

- #Eriugena, ‘Periphyseon’ II.530d; IV.755b

1 1 0 0

For an affirmation concerning the lower is a negation concerning the higher, and so too a negation concerning the lower is an affirmation concerning the higher.

- #Eriugena, ‘Periphyseon’ I.444a

0 1 0 0

For man does not subsist in these circumstances in which he now appears to be, but in so far as he exists he is contained within the hidden causes of nature after which he was first created and to which he is destined to return.

- #Eriugena, ‘ #Periphyseon’ 533c

1 1 0 0

Every visible or invisible creature is a theophany or appearance of God.

- John Scotus #Eriugena

1 1 0 0
Robert Fludd’s black square representing the nothingness that was prior to the universe, from his ‘Utriusque Cosmi’ (1617)

Robert Fludd’s black square representing the nothingness that was prior to the universe, from his ‘Utriusque Cosmi’ (1617)

𝘿𝒆𝙪𝒔 𝒊𝙩𝒂𝙦𝒖𝙚 𝙣𝒆𝙨𝒄𝙞𝒕 𝒔𝙚 𝙦𝒖𝙞𝒅 𝒆𝙨𝒕 𝒒𝙪𝒊𝙖 𝙣𝒐𝙣 𝙚𝒔𝙩 𝙦𝒖𝙞𝒅

God does not know of Himself what He is because He is not a ‘what’

– John Scotus #Eriugena, ‘ #𝑷𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒑𝙝𝒚𝙨𝒆𝙤𝒏’ II (589b)

2 1 0 0

The bodies of the saints shall be changed into reason.

– John Scotus #Eriugena, ‘ #𝑷𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒑𝙝𝒚𝙨𝒆𝙤𝒏’ I.451b-c

1 1 0 0

For an affirmation concerning the lower is a negation concerning the higher, and so too a negation concerning the lower is an affirmation concerning the higher.

- #Eriugena, ‘ #𝑷𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒑𝙝𝒚𝙨𝒆𝙤𝒏’ I.444a

1 1 0 0

For man does not subsist in these circumstances in which he now appears to be, but in so far as he exists he is contained within the hidden causes of nature after which he was first created and to which he is destined to return.

- #Eriugena, ‘ #𝑷𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒑𝙝𝒚𝙨𝒆𝙤𝒏’ 533c

0 1 0 0

Human nature is the workshop of all things.

- #Eriugena, ‘ #𝑷𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒑𝙝𝒚𝙨𝒆𝙤𝒏’ II.530d; IV.755b

0 1 0 0

God, ‘𝑻𝙝𝒆𝙤𝒔,’ is correctly understood as “Runner,” for He runs into all things and does not stand still at all, but fills everything by running.

- #Eriugena, ‘#𝑷𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒑𝙝𝒚𝙨𝒆𝙤𝒏’ I

2 1 0 1
Abraham looking for the stars, Byzantine manuscript, 6th Century

Abraham looking for the stars, Byzantine manuscript, 6th Century

Even Abraham knew God not through the letters of Scripture, which had not yet been composed, but by the revolution of the stars.

- John Scotus #Eriugena, ' #Periphyseon' III (724a)

10 2 1 0
Post image

#Eriugena #Theology #God

3 1 0 0

The bodies of the saints shall be changed into reason.

– John Scotus #Eriugena, ‘ #Periphyseon’ I.451b-c

3 1 0 0