Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#HEGSETH
Advertisement · 728 × 90
Defense One reports that the Pentagon’s own inspector general has drawn a hard line under Trump’s “War Department” stunt: branding is one thing, legal identity is another. The department can play dress-up on letterhead, but in court, investigations, and formal agreements, it is still the Department of Defense unless Congress changes the law.
“‘War Department’ still isn’t a legal name.”
“Only Congress has the authority to officially change the department’s name.”
“The IG’s main concern appears to be that using the unofficial name in legal documents could undermine a criminal case.”
Meghann Myers, Defense One, 7-Apr-2026
“For DCIS in particular, the stakes are high: even minor deviations from statutory identity in criminal proceedings could undermine the integrity of cases.”
Unnamed DoD contractor quoted by Meghann Myers in Defense One, 7-Apr-2026
“The rebranding effort introduces unnecessary friction into interagency coordination, congressional oversight, and international engagements.”
Unnamed DoD contractor quoted by Meghann Myers in Defense One, 7-Apr-2026

Defense One reports that the Pentagon’s own inspector general has drawn a hard line under Trump’s “War Department” stunt: branding is one thing, legal identity is another. The department can play dress-up on letterhead, but in court, investigations, and formal agreements, it is still the Department of Defense unless Congress changes the law. “‘War Department’ still isn’t a legal name.” “Only Congress has the authority to officially change the department’s name.” “The IG’s main concern appears to be that using the unofficial name in legal documents could undermine a criminal case.” Meghann Myers, Defense One, 7-Apr-2026 “For DCIS in particular, the stakes are high: even minor deviations from statutory identity in criminal proceedings could undermine the integrity of cases.” Unnamed DoD contractor quoted by Meghann Myers in Defense One, 7-Apr-2026 “The rebranding effort introduces unnecessary friction into interagency coordination, congressional oversight, and international engagements.” Unnamed DoD contractor quoted by Meghann Myers in Defense One, 7-Apr-2026

Trump and Hegseth can cosplay “War Department” all they want, but they cannot legally rename the Pentagon by fiat. 𝑶𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒅𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕. The IG is already warning the stunt could foul up criminal cases. 🍊🤡🪖📜 #Trump #Hegseth #Congress #RuleOfLaw #DoD

0 0 1 0
Preview
Pope says ‘enough of war’ and decries ‘delusion of omnipotence’ at peace vigil Leo’s comments did not directly mention war in Iran but read as his strongest condemnation of the conflict yet

Not a religious bone in my body, but a lot of respect for this man.
#auspol #uspol #Iran #trump #hegseth

www.theguardian.com/world/2026/a...

4 0 1 0

This.

#Hegseth #SecretaryOfWar #Oligarchy #Authoritarianism

1 0 0 0

Iran’s leadership is gone! We don’t even need a peace agreement because there is no Iran to make the agreement! Complete and Total Victory by #Trump and #Hegseth! 🇺🇸💪🏼🇺🇸

1 0 0 0
Hegseth removes Pentagon guardrails to limit civilian harm
Hegseth removes Pentagon guardrails to limit civilian harm YouTube video by Democracy Now!

Fucking #Israeli #Government #Trump #Netanyahu #Kushner #Hegseth youtube.com/shorts/LVnA6...

0 0 0 0

#Impeach #Hegseth immediately!

2 2 0 0
Trump's Pentagon Threatens Pope With Boring Historical Anecdotes #shorts
Trump's Pentagon Threatens Pope With Boring Historical Anecdotes #shorts YouTube video by Travis & Jonathan

Someone in Trump's Pentagon threatened the Pope with a historical kidnapping. Nothing strikes terror into papal hearts like referencing a 14th-century French incident. Worst kind of nerds-- boring, racist. #pope #pentagon #kidnapping #Trump #hegseth #vatican

4 3 0 0
Original post on mstdn.social

Op-Ed worth Reading

"The plot to bring down #Trump has begun

There is a war raging inside the #Maga movement "

#Russia #India #China #USA #Drones #Technology #Security #News #Iran #Israel #War #EU #NATO #Oil #Nuclear #Weapons #Trump #Warcrimes #Pentagon #Hegseth #WW3 […]

0 1 0 0

I agree. But it means nothing it they don't keep this same energy and oust the Felon r@pist from the white house. #trump, #Swalwell, and #Hegseth have ALL got to go.

1 0 0 0

I agree. But it means nothing if they don't keep this same energy and oust the Felon r@pist from the white house. #trump, #Swalwell, and #Hegseth have ALL got to go.

22 4 0 0

As a paid up member of the RC church, I'd been quite disappointed by #LeoXIV
Really expected him to be as outspoken as #Francis
However, coming to realise he is outspoken, but his style is very different.
And after the threats from #Pentagon (I.e. #Hegseth ) I'm changing my opinion of him.

1 0 1 0
Military Leaders GO OFF On Hegseth With CATASTROPHIC Warning
Military Leaders GO OFF On Hegseth With CATASTROPHIC Warning YouTube video by Rebel HQ

youtube.com/watch?v=oHLj... #Hegseth wants to purge the military because #Israel is controlling America’s government

0 0 0 0
Post image

Deux navires de guerre américains ont traversé le détroit d’#Ormuz dans le cadre d’une mission de déminage, affirme le chef du Pentagone, Pete #Hegseth. Auparavant, un journaliste d’Axios affirmait que plusieurs navires de la
https://francais.rt.com/

0 0 0 0
Post image

#trump #gop #oil #vance #immigration #protest #crime #maga #liberal #grift #corruption #equality #fascism #fraud #ice #hegseth #scotus #justice #politic #iran #war #israel #doj #lutnick #childcare #military #bessent #vought #patel #blanche #rubio #melania #kushner #witkoff #leavitt #education #vance

0 0 0 0

#US #Trump #IsraelFirst #Corruption #Iraq #PMF #Hegseth #Iran #AIPAC #MAGA

Max Blumenthal: ‘Israel First’ in Iran War Sparks MAGA Civil War youtu.be/TVmTEA9ViNU?... via @YouTube

0 0 0 0

🍊🤡🪖📉 In the Trump regime, propaganda now outruns intel BDA. With Hegseth, primping and pimping blur into one slick performance, while Trump sells the lie and reality gets shoved offstage. #Hegseth #Trump #Propaganda #Iran #BDA follows ⤵

0 0 0 0
{𝙖𝙅𝙎𝘿} My Notes on, Audit of, and Triangulation of the Article…
Core Finding
The strongest defensible reading is this: the Raw Story piece grabbed onto a real and important contradiction, but its headline phrasing is cleaner than the evidence warrants. Pete Hegseth’s Wed. 08-Apr-2026 claim that Iran’s missile program was “functionally destroyed” does not hold up in the broad, public way he stated it. But Raw Story’s “collapses” line overshoots in the other direction, because some narrower versions of Hegseth’s claim still have support in the record.1‑6
The central problem for Hegseth is not subtle:
In the Pentagon transcript, he did not limit himself to saying Iran’s production lines were wrecked or that many launchers were temporarily unusable.
He said the missile program itself was functionally destroyed, and he explicitly bundled together launchers, production facilities, and existing stockpiles.
The Wall Street Journal then reported, citing U.S. intelligence, that Iran still retained thousands of ballistic missiles, including more than 1,000 medium-range missiles, and could recover some launchers from underground sites.
That is a direct collision with the broad public version of Hegseth’s claim.2,3

{𝙖𝙅𝙎𝘿} My Notes on, Audit of, and Triangulation of the Article… Core Finding The strongest defensible reading is this: the Raw Story piece grabbed onto a real and important contradiction, but its headline phrasing is cleaner than the evidence warrants. Pete Hegseth’s Wed. 08-Apr-2026 claim that Iran’s missile program was “functionally destroyed” does not hold up in the broad, public way he stated it. But Raw Story’s “collapses” line overshoots in the other direction, because some narrower versions of Hegseth’s claim still have support in the record.1‑6 The central problem for Hegseth is not subtle: In the Pentagon transcript, he did not limit himself to saying Iran’s production lines were wrecked or that many launchers were temporarily unusable. He said the missile program itself was functionally destroyed, and he explicitly bundled together launchers, production facilities, and existing stockpiles. The Wall Street Journal then reported, citing U.S. intelligence, that Iran still retained thousands of ballistic missiles, including more than 1,000 medium-range missiles, and could recover some launchers from underground sites. That is a direct collision with the broad public version of Hegseth’s claim.2,3

What the stronger reporting supports
The better-supported picture is severe degradation, not elimination:
The Pentagon’s own Wed. 08-Apr-2026 briefing described extensive destruction of missile-related infrastructure,
while AP reported that General Dan Caine said the U.S. had struck more than 450 ballistic-missile storage facilities and that about 90% of Iran’s weapons factories had been attacked.
AP also stressed that these numbers still fell short of the administration’s more sweeping rhetoric about Iran having been fully “decimated.”2,4
Independent analytical work points in the same direction:
A Wed. 25-Mar-2026 Center for Strategic and International Studies assessment found that Iranian drone and missile launches dropped sharply after the opening days of the war,
but it also warned that “lingering launch capacity” continued to inflict damage. In other words, reduced rate is not the same thing as zero capacity.5
That matters because Raw Story’s frame invites a too-simple binary: either Hegseth was right, or the missile program was basically untouched. The evidence says neither. Iran took major damage, lost a great deal of usable capacity, and saw launch activity fall. It also retained a meaningful residual missile threat.3‑5

What the stronger reporting supports The better-supported picture is severe degradation, not elimination: The Pentagon’s own Wed. 08-Apr-2026 briefing described extensive destruction of missile-related infrastructure, while AP reported that General Dan Caine said the U.S. had struck more than 450 ballistic-missile storage facilities and that about 90% of Iran’s weapons factories had been attacked. AP also stressed that these numbers still fell short of the administration’s more sweeping rhetoric about Iran having been fully “decimated.”2,4 Independent analytical work points in the same direction: A Wed. 25-Mar-2026 Center for Strategic and International Studies assessment found that Iranian drone and missile launches dropped sharply after the opening days of the war, but it also warned that “lingering launch capacity” continued to inflict damage. In other words, reduced rate is not the same thing as zero capacity.5 That matters because Raw Story’s frame invites a too-simple binary: either Hegseth was right, or the missile program was basically untouched. The evidence says neither. Iran took major damage, lost a great deal of usable capacity, and saw launch activity fall. It also retained a meaningful residual missile threat.3‑5

The Serious Confounder
A serious confounding argument comes from the Critical Threats Project’s Fri. 03-Apr-2026 special report. Its point is operational rather than rhetorical: missiles or launchers can remain physically intact yet still be combat ineffective if tunnel entrances are collapsed, launchers are inaccessible, command-and-control is degraded, or units cannot move from underground storage. On that view, survival in inventory does not equal near-term usability.6
That is the best defence of Hegseth’s position, and it deserves to be taken seriously. If “functionally destroyed” is narrowed to mean that much of Iran’s missile force could not be employed effectively in the immediate operational environment, then the claim becomes more arguable. Critical Threats also argues that extensive strikes on industrial and support elements would make reconstitution harder over time.6
But that confounder only rescues a narrower claim, not the one Hegseth actually made in public. His Wed. 08-Apr-2026 language was triumphalist and expansive. He did not carefully distinguish between stockpiles, launchers, buried systems, industrial capacity, and command degradation. He sold a totalizing victory narrative. The later intelligence picture does not sustain that.2‑4

The Serious Confounder A serious confounding argument comes from the Critical Threats Project’s Fri. 03-Apr-2026 special report. Its point is operational rather than rhetorical: missiles or launchers can remain physically intact yet still be combat ineffective if tunnel entrances are collapsed, launchers are inaccessible, command-and-control is degraded, or units cannot move from underground storage. On that view, survival in inventory does not equal near-term usability.6 That is the best defence of Hegseth’s position, and it deserves to be taken seriously. If “functionally destroyed” is narrowed to mean that much of Iran’s missile force could not be employed effectively in the immediate operational environment, then the claim becomes more arguable. Critical Threats also argues that extensive strikes on industrial and support elements would make reconstitution harder over time.6 But that confounder only rescues a narrower claim, not the one Hegseth actually made in public. His Wed. 08-Apr-2026 language was triumphalist and expansive. He did not carefully distinguish between stockpiles, launchers, buried systems, industrial capacity, and command degradation. He sold a totalizing victory narrative. The later intelligence picture does not sustain that.2‑4

The Hormuz Problem
Raw Story’s missile point is stronger than its Strait of Hormuz wording:
On Fri. 10-Apr-2026, Reuters reported that ship traffic through the strait remained stalled despite the ceasefire.
By Sat. 11-Apr-2026, Reuters was already reporting that three supertankers had passed through a trial anchorage as talks began in Pakistan.
That means the Raw Story sentence saying Hormuz “remains heavily blocked” was time-sensitive and quickly aged. It was not pure fabrication, but it was too static for a rapidly moving situation.8,9
The larger strategic issue is uglier for Washington than Hegseth’s rhetoric suggests. Reuters reported on Wed. 08-Apr-2026 that analysts and Gulf sources viewed the ceasefire as potentially leaving Iran with enduring leverage over Hormuz, continued political control at home, retained missile and drone capacity, and unresolved nuclear material issues. That is the deeper problem: tactical destruction does not automatically translate into strategic success.7
What the Raw Story Piece Gets Right, And What It Misses
What Raw Story got right is the core contradiction. The article correctly spotted that an intelligence-based account of surviving missiles and recoverable launchers punches a hole in the administration’s sweeping battlefield-victory language. That part is real.1‑3
What it misses is the analytic distinction that matters most: stockpile, launcher availability, launch tempo, and industrial regeneration are not the same thing. A state can retain thousands of missiles on paper while still suffering a major near-term operational impairment. It can also suffer that impairment while still posing a serious deterrent and coercive threat. Raw Story mostly treats those categories as interchangeable, which muddies rather than clarifies the audit.1,5,6

The Hormuz Problem Raw Story’s missile point is stronger than its Strait of Hormuz wording: On Fri. 10-Apr-2026, Reuters reported that ship traffic through the strait remained stalled despite the ceasefire. By Sat. 11-Apr-2026, Reuters was already reporting that three supertankers had passed through a trial anchorage as talks began in Pakistan. That means the Raw Story sentence saying Hormuz “remains heavily blocked” was time-sensitive and quickly aged. It was not pure fabrication, but it was too static for a rapidly moving situation.8,9 The larger strategic issue is uglier for Washington than Hegseth’s rhetoric suggests. Reuters reported on Wed. 08-Apr-2026 that analysts and Gulf sources viewed the ceasefire as potentially leaving Iran with enduring leverage over Hormuz, continued political control at home, retained missile and drone capacity, and unresolved nuclear material issues. That is the deeper problem: tactical destruction does not automatically translate into strategic success.7 What the Raw Story Piece Gets Right, And What It Misses What Raw Story got right is the core contradiction. The article correctly spotted that an intelligence-based account of surviving missiles and recoverable launchers punches a hole in the administration’s sweeping battlefield-victory language. That part is real.1‑3 What it misses is the analytic distinction that matters most: stockpile, launcher availability, launch tempo, and industrial regeneration are not the same thing. A state can retain thousands of missiles on paper while still suffering a major near-term operational impairment. It can also suffer that impairment while still posing a serious deterrent and coercive threat. Raw Story mostly treats those categories as interchangeable, which muddies rather than clarifies the audit.1,5,6

🍊🤡🪖📉 In the Trump regime, propaganda now outruns intel BDA: Hegseth briefs the cameras, Trump briefs the cult, and reality gets told to shut up. #Hegseth #Trump #Propaganda #Iran #BDA

{𝙖𝙅𝙎𝘿} #CaveatLector My Notes on, Audit of, and Triangulation of the Article… follows ⤵

1 0 1 1

Douglas Wilson, #Hegseth pastor, preaches male dominance, reduces women’s political voice to their husbands, and defended slavery as “harmonious" in his book. Hegseth even moved his family to Nashville so his children could attend the Christian school tied to the movement associated with Wilson.

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

#hegseth

0 0 0 0
"Macho Pete" (from the record "MAGA Country")
"Macho Pete" (from the record "MAGA Country") YouTube video by MAGA Country

youtu.be/qdkiQKuadBo?...

#Parody #Hegseth

7 4 1 2

Everytime Kegseth talks it sounds like he’s giving a report on his GI Joe game. It’s embarrassing. #Hegseth #Pentagon

0 0 0 0

Reminder that #Trump's Defense secretary is an unmitigated racist.

"I think the single dumbest phrase in military history is ‘our diversity is our strength.’”

☑️ Pentagon's #Hegseth: 'diversity is our strength' is dumbest phrase in military history | Reuters
www.reuters.com/world/us/pen...
#racism

0 0 0 0
Original post on mastodon.social

Reminder that Trump's Defense Dept secretary is a raging, unmitigated racist.

Hegseth, told an audience of several hundred military people, “I think the single dumbest phrase in military history is ‘our diversity is our strength.’”

☑️ Pentagon's Hegseth: 'diversity is our strength' is dumbest […]

0 0 0 0
Hegseth's key Iran claim collapses as US intel finds Iran has thousands of missiles One of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's main defenses of the U.S. decision to negotiate a controversial ceasefire with Iran is that its ballistic missile program has been "functionally destroyed."But that claim has now been shot down by U.S. intelligence assessments, the Wall Street Journal repor...

👇🇺🇸🇮🇷 "Hegseth's key Iran claim collapses as US intel finds Iran has thousands of missiles" #Iran #Hegseth
#USIntel #ThousandsOfMissiles

2 0 1 0
Post image

#Trump #DonaldTrump #TACO #TrumpAlwaysChickensOut #TrumpTariffs #Economy #Tariffs #Unemployment #Inflation #Stagflation #FuckingMoron #DementiaDon #Iran #Hegseth #PeteHegseth #WarCrimes #WarCriminal #WarCriminals #TheHague

#Epstein #JeffreyEpstein #childsextrafficking #ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles

0 1 0 0
Preview
Pete Hegseth reposts video that says women shouldn’t be allowed to vote Progressive evangelical group says ideas shared by pastors and amplified by defense secretary are ‘very disturbing’

#Hegseth has shared those views before.

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

0 0 0 0
Original post on mstdn.social

US 'problem' as of today:

~2,500 US Marines + elements of the 82nd Airborne (several thousand, incl. ~1,500 surge) deployed to the Middle East; positioned regionally, not reported conducting ground combat inside Iran
www.reuters.com/world/us-deploys-marines...

Iran […]

0 0 0 0

Pope Leo:

“Absurd and inhuman violence is spreading ferociously through the sacred places of the Christian East, profaned by the blasphemy of war and the brutality of business, with no regard for people’s lives...”

#Trump #DonaldTrump #Iran #IranWar #Hegseth #PeteHegseth #WarCrimes #WarCriminals

0 0 0 0

Pope Leo:

"God does not bless any conflict. Anyone who is a disciple of Christ, the Prince of Peace, is never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs."

#Trump #DonaldTrump #Iran #Hegseth #PeteHegseth #WarCrimes #WarCriminal #WarCriminals #TheHague

3 1 0 0