From Musk's A.I.tool, Grok:
Probability of Stopping Voluntarily
The likelihood that Trump, Musk, and the GQP would stop their efforts of their own accord is extremely low—virtually zero. Several factors support this assessment:
« Ideological Commitment: <snip>
Musk’s public targeting of agencies like USAID and his role in
DOGE underscore a relentless pursuit of this goal.
« Mutual Reinforcement: Trump’s executive power & Musk’s wealth & influence create a powerful synergy. Musk’s involvement, fueled by personal grievances & a desire to reshape government, makes him an unwavering partner.Trump, bolstered by Musk’s support, shows no signs of backing down.
« Favorable Political Climate
<snip>
« Strategic Momentum: Their efforts are proactive, not reactive. A shutdown would only enhance their ability to act, not deter them. Historical patterns—Trump’s past willingness to embrace shutdowns and Musk’s persistence in ambitious projects—suggest they would press forward regardless of consequences.
Conclusion
A government shutdown would have facilitated Trump, Musk, and the GQP’s efforts to dismantle the government by creating an environment of reduced resistance & increased executive latitude. The probability of them stopping voluntarily is negligible, given their ideological drive, mutual support, and
the absence of significant obstacles. Far from derailing their plans, a shutdown would have been a strategic advantage in their mission to reshape the federal government.
2/2
First response was from ChatGPT (A.I.)
Same exact question to Musk's A.I. tool, Grok:
> “Would shutting down the government have impacted the effort of Trump, Musk & GQP to rapidly demolish the government? What is the probability that they will stop of their own accord?”
#MakeAmericaSane
