Advertisement ยท 728 ร— 90
#
Hashtag
#MixtralAI
Advertisement ยท 728 ร— 90
Preview
WormGPT Makes a Comeback Using Jailbroken Grok and Mixtral Models Follow us on Bluesky, Twitter (X), Mastodon and Facebook at @Hackread

#WormGPT is back, now powered by jailbroken Grok and Mixtral AI models allowing cybercriminals to bypass security to generate malicious content.

๐Ÿ”— hackread.com/wormgpt-retu...

#CyberSecurity #AI #Grok #MixtralAI #CyberCrime #AISecurity

1 3 0 0
Comments:

Mixtral AI: The abstract provides a general idea about the topic and the proposed view of rationality. However, it lacks details about the methodology, sample size, hypotheses, and aims of the study. The significance of the study could be better explained, as the abstract does not clarify how the findings could advance science or society. The abstract ...is relevant ..., but it would be more impactful with a clearer explanation of the research methods and findings. The abstract could benefit from more rigorous detailing of the experiment or methodology used.

Reviewer 1: The study presents an original and relevant view with practical implications for generative AI systems and human-AI interaction.

Reviewer 2: The idea seems pretty straightforward, [and] remains very relevant. Looking forward to the paper.

Reviewer 3: This submission is a theoritical paper. The litterature is rich with debates.... I am very curious to see how the author.... The topic is very relevant.

Comments: Mixtral AI: The abstract provides a general idea about the topic and the proposed view of rationality. However, it lacks details about the methodology, sample size, hypotheses, and aims of the study. The significance of the study could be better explained, as the abstract does not clarify how the findings could advance science or society. The abstract ...is relevant ..., but it would be more impactful with a clearer explanation of the research methods and findings. The abstract could benefit from more rigorous detailing of the experiment or methodology used. Reviewer 1: The study presents an original and relevant view with practical implications for generative AI systems and human-AI interaction. Reviewer 2: The idea seems pretty straightforward, [and] remains very relevant. Looking forward to the paper. Reviewer 3: This submission is a theoritical paper. The litterature is rich with debates.... I am very curious to see how the author.... The topic is very relevant.

#AI referee reports for my most recent draft dropped (alongside ratings from 3 human peer reviewers).

#MixtralAI rated it lower, on average, especially on "content" and "originality".

Only the humans realized this was a theory paper (that doesn't collect or analyze new data).

0 1 0 1