"Mitigating animal methods bias in grant review. Tip #4. Play an active role in review groups." COLAAB logo
"Volunteer for reviewer positions and make yourself available to review staff. Animal methods bias may lead reviewers to insist on animal-based methods for the validation of in vitro findings, prefer animal-derived data over more clinically relevant patient-based research, or reject the use of NAM-based models outright. It’s important for researchers with nonanimal expertise to participate in review groups so that nonanimal proposals can get fair and appropriate evaluations."
"Identify and address biased comments of fellow reviewers. While participating in review groups, it’s important for researchers to identify and address comments from other reviewers reflecting animal methods bias. If available, they should do so through official bias reporting mechanisms. During review discussions, they should vocally identify biased comments and support and defend nonanimal approaches."
💡 Tip of the week! 🧪
📣 Have you thought about taking part in the #PeerReview process? This week’s recommendations are all about how researchers can mitigate #AnimalMethodsBias by participating in review groups! 👇
#NAMs #nonanimalresearch