Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag
#O4IsHere
Advertisement · 728 × 90
A cumulative detection plot, including significant candidate events from O4a, O4b, and O4c.

There were a totla of 3 probable canddiates following O1, 11 following O2, 90 following O3, and 218 following O4a. There were 165 significant candidates in O4b and 68 in O4c. The total is almost 400.

From O1 through O4a, the counts refer to the detected gravitational-wave events that are included in the GWTC papers. In contrast, the counts for O4b and O4c refer to candidate events for which a significant low-latency alert was issued and that were not subsequently retracted.

The O4c data collection period is divided into two segments: January 28 April 1, 2025 and June 11 November 18, 2025. These segments are distinguished in the figure by different fill colors: the first is represented in dark blue, and the second in light blue. The intervening gap is omitted from the figure.

A cumulative detection plot, including significant candidate events from O4a, O4b, and O4c. There were a totla of 3 probable canddiates following O1, 11 following O2, 90 following O3, and 218 following O4a. There were 165 significant candidates in O4b and 68 in O4c. The total is almost 400. From O1 through O4a, the counts refer to the detected gravitational-wave events that are included in the GWTC papers. In contrast, the counts for O4b and O4c refer to candidate events for which a significant low-latency alert was issued and that were not subsequently retracted. The O4c data collection period is divided into two segments: January 28 April 1, 2025 and June 11 November 18, 2025. These segments are distinguished in the figure by different fill colors: the first is represented in dark blue, and the second in light blue. The intervening gap is omitted from the figure.

Our fourth observing run (O4) has seen our detectors perform better than ever before. Together with @egovirgo.bsky.social and KAGRA we have identified more gravitational-wave candidates than in all previous observing runs combined

#O4IsHere 🔭⚛️🧪

8 0 0 1

Fascinating detections from LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA!

#GW241011 & #GW241110 showcase unequal-mass, rapidly spinning black hole mergers—potentially hierarchical, with the massive primaries possibly "second-generation" relics from prior fusions in dense clusters.

#O4IsHere 🔭🧪⚛️ #science

1/2

42 8 1 0
Plots showing how the new detection compare to our previous observations. The top panel shows all the events from the LVK’s most recently published catalog, GWTC-4.0, and our two new events GW241011 and GW241110 ordered by the primary spin projected in the direction of the spin of the orbital plane — in other words, how aligned the primary black hole’s spin direction is with the binary system’s orbit direction. Values greater than zero means the black hole is aligned with the spin of the orbit, whereas less than zero means the system is anti-aligned. The bottom panel shows the distribution of primary mass (the mass of the larger black hole) in solar masses and the mass ratio of the black hole pair for all events from GWTC-4.0 including our new events.

Plots showing how the new detection compare to our previous observations. The top panel shows all the events from the LVK’s most recently published catalog, GWTC-4.0, and our two new events GW241011 and GW241110 ordered by the primary spin projected in the direction of the spin of the orbital plane — in other words, how aligned the primary black hole’s spin direction is with the binary system’s orbit direction. Values greater than zero means the black hole is aligned with the spin of the orbit, whereas less than zero means the system is anti-aligned. The bottom panel shows the distribution of primary mass (the mass of the larger black hole) in solar masses and the mass ratio of the black hole pair for all events from GWTC-4.0 including our new events.

Our new paper on our LIGO @egovirgo.bsky.social KAGRA discovery of #GW241011 and #GW241110 is now published

doi.org/10.3847/2041...

These observations can tell us about the astrophysics of binary formation and test fundamental physics

#O4IsHere #GW10Years

15 1 1 0
Infographic about GW241011 and GW241110

GW241011's source contained black holes about 13 and 8 times the mass of our Sun. The spin of the bigger black hole is high and bear aligned with the orbit.

GW241110's source contained black holes about 17 and 8 times the mass of our Sun. The spin of the larger black hole is high and near anti-aligned with the orbit.

Credit: Shanika Galaudage/Northwestern University/Adler Planetarium

Infographic about GW241011 and GW241110 GW241011's source contained black holes about 13 and 8 times the mass of our Sun. The spin of the bigger black hole is high and bear aligned with the orbit. GW241110's source contained black holes about 17 and 8 times the mass of our Sun. The spin of the larger black hole is high and near anti-aligned with the orbit. Credit: Shanika Galaudage/Northwestern University/Adler Planetarium

We are pleased to announce our discovery of #GW241011 and #GW241110

Both come from binary black holes where one black hole is much larger than the other. The larger black holes have large spin. Could these black holes have formed in a previous merger?

ligo.org/science-summ...

#O4IsHere 🔭🧪⚛️☄️

140 50 3 3

Back in 2010, my PhD student Chase Kimball led a study of the population of binary black holes that found evidence for repeated mergers

arxiv.org/abs/2011.05332

There were still lots of uncertainties then. Now, these new discoveries are great candidates for hierarchical mergers!

🔭🧪⚛️☄️ #O4IsHere

29 7 1 1
A black hole hunting machine
New black hole merger bolsters Hawking area theorem
Physicists spliced merger's gravitational signal into isolated frequencies to determine surface area

A black hole hunting machine New black hole merger bolsters Hawking area theorem Physicists spliced merger's gravitational signal into isolated frequencies to determine surface area

"The clearest black hole merger signal yet … offers new insights into these mysterious objects."

@jenlucpiquant.bsky.social writes in @arstechnica.com about the discovery of #GW250114

arstechnica.com/science/2025...

#O4IsHere #EinsteinWasRight #KerrWasRight #HawkingWasRight 🧪🔭⚛️

10 0 1 0
A cartoon showing the area of the two progenitor black holes inferred from the inspiral part of the signal is less than the area of the final black hole inferred from the ringdown part of the signal.

Credit: L. Reading-Ikkanda/Simons Foundation

A cartoon showing the area of the two progenitor black holes inferred from the inspiral part of the signal is less than the area of the final black hole inferred from the ringdown part of the signal. Credit: L. Reading-Ikkanda/Simons Foundation

"Landmark Black Hole Test Marks Decade of Gravitational-Wave Discoveries"

Chiara Mingarelli writes for APS Physics Magazine about #GW250114 physics.aps.org/articles/v18...

#O4IsHere #EinsteinWasRight #HawkingWasRight #KerrWasRight 🧪🔭⚛️

11 4 1 0
Gizmondo headline "LIGO’s Sharpest Detection Yet Confirms Famous Stephen Hawking Theory" above an artistic image of a binary black hole merger in a soothing blue by Maggie Chiang for Simons Foundation

Gizmondo headline "LIGO’s Sharpest Detection Yet Confirms Famous Stephen Hawking Theory" above an artistic image of a binary black hole merger in a soothing blue by Maggie Chiang for Simons Foundation

"Ten years after LIGO’s historical detection of gravitational waves, the project is cracking black hole mysteries at an astounding pace"

@gayoung.bsky.social writes in @gizmodo.com about #GW250114

gizmodo.com/ligos-sharpe...

#O4IsHere #EinsteinWasRight #HawkingWasRight #KerrWasRight 🔭🧪⚛️

20 8 1 0
A comparison of GW250114 with our first detection GW150914. The stretching of space in the new black hole merger (top) is similar to that in the first one ever spotted (bottom), but because of reductions in the noise in the detectors, the signal stands out far more clearly.

Graphic by C. Bickel/Science. Data from us

A comparison of GW250114 with our first detection GW150914. The stretching of space in the new black hole merger (top) is similar to that in the first one ever spotted (bottom), but because of reductions in the noise in the detectors, the signal stands out far more clearly. Graphic by C. Bickel/Science. Data from us

"Strongest black hole collision yet confirms theories of Einstein, Hawking"

Adrian Cho of @science.org writes about our discovery of #GW250114

www.science.org/content/arti...

#O4IsHere #EinsteinWasRight #HawkingWasRight #KerrWasRight 🔭🧪⚛️☄️

12 1 1 0
GW250114
A very loud cousin of GW150914!

Observed by: H, L
Source: Binary black hole
Date: January 14 2025
Time: 8:22:03 UTC

No. of cycles from 30 Hz to merger: ~8
No. of ringdown cycles: ~2
Peak GW strain: ~10^21
Total energy emitted: ~5.5*10^54 erg

Distance: 333 to 477 Mpc
Redshift: 0.08 to 0.1
Signal-to-noise ratio: ~77 to 80
False alarm rate: < 1 per 100 yr

Total mass: 65 to 67 solar masses
Primary mass: 33 to 50 solar masses
Secondary mass: 31 to 33 solar masses
Remnant mass: 62 to 64 solar masses

Primary spin: <0.24
Secondary spin: <0.26
Remnant spin: 0.67 to 0.69

Fundamental mode frequency: 241 to 253 Hz
Fundamenal mode damping time: 3.8 to 5.3 ms
First overtone frequency: 240 to 257 Hz
First overtone damping time: 1.2 to 1.7 ms
Deviation from Kerr: −20% to +40%

Components' area: 2.4*10^5 km^2
Remnant area: 4.1*10^6 km^2
Area increase: ~65%

Quadrupole mode matches Kerr: Within ~2%
Hexadecapole mode matches Kerr: Within ~62%
Best PN paramter bound: Within ~3%
Remnant mass: −6% to +7% of Kerr

GW250114 A very loud cousin of GW150914! Observed by: H, L Source: Binary black hole Date: January 14 2025 Time: 8:22:03 UTC No. of cycles from 30 Hz to merger: ~8 No. of ringdown cycles: ~2 Peak GW strain: ~10^21 Total energy emitted: ~5.5*10^54 erg Distance: 333 to 477 Mpc Redshift: 0.08 to 0.1 Signal-to-noise ratio: ~77 to 80 False alarm rate: < 1 per 100 yr Total mass: 65 to 67 solar masses Primary mass: 33 to 50 solar masses Secondary mass: 31 to 33 solar masses Remnant mass: 62 to 64 solar masses Primary spin: <0.24 Secondary spin: <0.26 Remnant spin: 0.67 to 0.69 Fundamental mode frequency: 241 to 253 Hz Fundamenal mode damping time: 3.8 to 5.3 ms First overtone frequency: 240 to 257 Hz First overtone damping time: 1.2 to 1.7 ms Deviation from Kerr: −20% to +40% Components' area: 2.4*10^5 km^2 Remnant area: 4.1*10^6 km^2 Area increase: ~65% Quadrupole mode matches Kerr: Within ~2% Hexadecapole mode matches Kerr: Within ~62% Best PN paramter bound: Within ~3% Remnant mass: −6% to +7% of Kerr

When two black holes (BHs) collide and merge, they release gravitational waves. These waves can be detected by sensitive instruments on Earth, allowing scientists to determine the mass and spin of the BHs. The clearest BH merger signal yet, named GW250114, recorded by LIGO in January 2025, offers new insights into these mysterious cosmic giants.

Telling Overtones
A fleeting secondary tone was detected in the signal, offering a rare chance to test the “Kerr solution,” which describes a rotating BH using only mass and spin. Excitingly, the mass and spin values from this overtone matched those from the fundamental tone. If they had differed, it would imply that additional properties are necessary to describe a BH, but a match confirms that — at least for this BH — no other details are needed.

Forever Growing
The signal also tested Hawking’s area theorem, which states that a BH’s surface area can never decrease —it can only grow. Surface area of a BH is determined by the area of its event horizon and is proportional to the square of the BH’s mass. Comparing the BHs before and after the merger confirmed that the surface area had increased, supporting the theorem.

When two black holes (BHs) collide and merge, they release gravitational waves. These waves can be detected by sensitive instruments on Earth, allowing scientists to determine the mass and spin of the BHs. The clearest BH merger signal yet, named GW250114, recorded by LIGO in January 2025, offers new insights into these mysterious cosmic giants. Telling Overtones A fleeting secondary tone was detected in the signal, offering a rare chance to test the “Kerr solution,” which describes a rotating BH using only mass and spin. Excitingly, the mass and spin values from this overtone matched those from the fundamental tone. If they had differed, it would imply that additional properties are necessary to describe a BH, but a match confirms that — at least for this BH — no other details are needed. Forever Growing The signal also tested Hawking’s area theorem, which states that a BH’s surface area can never decrease —it can only grow. Surface area of a BH is determined by the area of its event horizon and is proportional to the square of the BH’s mass. Comparing the BHs before and after the merger confirmed that the surface area had increased, supporting the theorem.

Catch up with everything you need to know about our latest #GravitationalWave discovery #GW250114 with our infographics

Credit: Sanika Khadkikar/Penn State & Lucy Reading-Ikkanda/Simons Foundation

#O4IsHere 🔭🧪⚛️☄️

22 3 1 1
Probability distribution for the fractional area difference of GW250114, equal to the area of the final black hole minus the sum of the areas  of the initial black holes, divided by the initial area as a normalization. According to the Hawking Area Theorem, the fractional area difference should lie to the right of the dark gray shaded region – i.e., to the right of the dashed vertical line that corresponds to a fractional area difference of zero. We can see that the probability distribution strongly disfavors values of the fractional area difference which are less than zero; this is consistent with the Hawking Area Theorem. The peak of the probability distribution is also in good agreement with the light grey vertical band, labelled “Predicted increase”, which indicates the fractional area difference predicted by general relativity, corresponding to an increase in area of about 65%.

Probability distribution for the fractional area difference of GW250114, equal to the area of the final black hole minus the sum of the areas of the initial black holes, divided by the initial area as a normalization. According to the Hawking Area Theorem, the fractional area difference should lie to the right of the dark gray shaded region – i.e., to the right of the dashed vertical line that corresponds to a fractional area difference of zero. We can see that the probability distribution strongly disfavors values of the fractional area difference which are less than zero; this is consistent with the Hawking Area Theorem. The peak of the probability distribution is also in good agreement with the light grey vertical band, labelled “Predicted increase”, which indicates the fractional area difference predicted by general relativity, corresponding to an increase in area of about 65%.

Our theories about black holes say that the event-horizon area of the final black hole should be larger than the areas of the two initial black holes

Fitting data before and after merger, we find #GW250114 matches predictions!

ligo.org/science-summ...

📈: doi.org/10.1103/kw5g...

#O4IsHere 🧪⚛️☄️🔭

30 4 1 0
Video

When a black hole is formed in a merger it emits a set of #GravitationalWave frequencies, ringing like a bell

Measuring these tests the nature of black holes. #GW250114 lets us measure multiple overtones, and they agree with theory

🎞️: Pfeiffer/Buonanno/Mitman/@sxs.bsky.social

#O4IsHere ⚛️🔭☄️

30 5 1 0

Loud signals are perfect for testing Einstein's theory of general relativity.

The previous loudest signal was #GW230814 with a signal-to-noise ratio of 42. #GW250114 has a signal-to-noise ratio of 80. This enables some extremely precise tests!

bsky.app/profile/ligo...

#O4IsHere

20 0 1 0
Measured masses for GW150914 and GW250114. Both have black holes of around the same masses (roughly 35 times the mass of our Sun). However, the uncertainty on the measurements for GW250114 are much smaller. This is the type of thing that makes astrophysicists excited.

Measured masses for GW150914 and GW250114. Both have black holes of around the same masses (roughly 35 times the mass of our Sun). However, the uncertainty on the measurements for GW250114 are much smaller. This is the type of thing that makes astrophysicists excited.

#GW250114's source is much like that for our first detection GW150914. Progress with our detectors means that the signal is much louder. Therefore, we can make much better measurements

📊: doi.org/10.1103/kw5g...

#O4IsHere

19 0 1 0

This is a good one

Rating: 🍦🦆🍦🦆🎈

#O4IsHere

12 1 1 0
GW250114 – The Clearest of Chirps
GW250114 – The Clearest of Chirps YouTube video by LIGO Virgo KAGRA

What a difference a decade makes! Announcing the clearest #GravitationalWave detection ever #GW250114

youtu.be/2XmZ8-XQ9jU

📓: doi.org/10.1103/kw5g...

🔭🧪⚛️☄️ #O4IsHere

139 50 6 5
Preview
LIGO, facing threats of closure, more than doubles its black hole haul 10 years ago, LIGO saw its first gravitational wave. After 218 detections, our view of black holes has changed forever. Can this era endure?

"10 years ago, LIGO saw its first gravitational wave. After 218 detections, our view of black holes has changed forever."

bigthink.com/starts-with-... by @startswithabang.bsky.social

#GWTC4 #O4IsHere 🔭🧪⚛️

33 10 2 1
Post image

We are excited to announce the discovery of #GW231123, a gravitational-wave signal from the merger of two high-mass black holes to form one about 190–265 times the mass of our Sun

ligo.org/ligo-virgo-k...

#O4IsHere 🔭🧪☄️

109 38 2 16
Video

🎉 We have reached 200 #GravitationalWave candidates in O4! 🎉

The fourth observing run (O4) of our detector network has had the best performance so far, with more candidates than ever before! We are currently busy analysing all these wonderful data and look forward to sharing results

#O4IsHere 🔭☄️

42 13 2 3
Post image Post image

Second #GravitationalWave candidate of the day #S241109bn

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 2200 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241109bn/
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/38142
Rating 🍪🦢🥛

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Morning #GravitationalWave candidate #S241109p

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 540 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241109p/
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/38138
Rating 🦆🥓🌅

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Extra Diwali festivities with another #GravitationalWave candidate #S241102cy

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 2.1 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241102cy
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/38045
Rating 🪿🪔

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Day 2 of November and the 2nd #GravitationalWave candidate #S241102br

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 2.8 10^33 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241102br
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/38043
Rating 🦢🦢🎆

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Celebrate Diwali with #GravitationalWave candidate #S241101ee

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 2300 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241101ee
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/38036
Rating 🎆🦉🪔

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
GCN - Circulars - 37778 - LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S241011k: Upd...

https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37778
Rating 🦚🍥🍨

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
GCN - Circulars - 37750 - LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S241009em: Id...

https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37750
Rating 🛸🐑

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

If real, #S241009an's source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 16,000 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241009an
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37745
Rating 🎃🍨🏂

#O4IsHere 2/🧵

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Two #GravitationalWave candidates this morning #S241009l & #S241009an

If real, S241009l's source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 0.96 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241009l
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37743
Rating 👻

#O4IsHere 1/🧵

0 0 1 0
Post image Post image

Monday #GravitationalWave candidate #S241007bw

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 1.9 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241007bw
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37727
Rating 🍏🕊️

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Relaxed Sunday #GravitationalWave candidate #S241006k

If real, the source is probably a binary black hole

False alarm rate 1 in 5.3 × 10^33 yr
GraceDB https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S241006k/
GCN https://gcn.nasa.gov/circulars/37719
Rating 🌄🦢🐦‍⬛

#O4IsHere

0 0 0 0