![Text reads:
We’re not writing for scope and scale, we’re writing for quality of a knowledge system, we’re writing because we want to bring that [Indigenous] voice forward. Now, if I was going to be really tactical, I would abandon all of that and just write for scale and write to have the broadest citation marketplace appeal—so as many consumers of my work would be interested in citing it. So, to me, that’s a fundamental tension in the way that citations are used to grade a scholar’s quality of work.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2h7u5mc2vr7xwxqu2luozdpf/bafkreiaxuiweydodnxy6fvf7hs5mc3dlkij24o7tzlrxe5zsg5bid4y6wy)
Text reads: We’re not writing for scope and scale, we’re writing for quality of a knowledge system, we’re writing because we want to bring that [Indigenous] voice forward. Now, if I was going to be really tactical, I would abandon all of that and just write for scale and write to have the broadest citation marketplace appeal—so as many consumers of my work would be interested in citing it. So, to me, that’s a fundamental tension in the way that citations are used to grade a scholar’s quality of work.
Reading back through the article my team published last year in light of the PBRF/TREF news #ReducedToANumber
doi.org/10.31273/eir...
0
0
0
0