If we are going to agree that housing benefits are required to keep people in their homes and that these benefits must be linked to “real rents” then we must also surely agree that these costs must be capped and controlled. The RRB purports to offer solutions to this crisis, however we see nothing which will provide any better protection than the current system which allows only for rent increases within a tenancy to be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal and only when they are arguably inconsistent with market rents.
Without caps and controls on increases between tenancies, and with a fair rents system measured only against market rents, rather than against any fair and independently calculated metric, rents will continue to rise and the cost to ourselves, the public, along with it. The charity Shelter provided policy and international evidence on rent caps and controls during the last general election, why doesn’t the RRB include rent caps and controls? Rent caps and controls are essential to stabilise the cruel and unpredictable situation that people find themselves trapped in. Successive governments have consistently ignored campaigners and protected the profits of the landlord class for decades. What does that say about them?
A digitally drawn flag displaying "LRA" flys, between the flag pole and base of the flag, the handwritten "Liverpool Residents Action" fills the square void. In the middle of the image, the centred text reads. "Liverpool Residents Action is a grassroots organisation that aims to help and represent the interests of residents in the city with their housing needs.", new line, "Membership is free." new line. "To join, head to lraction.uk/join-LRA"
#RentCapsandControls
lraction.uk/rentcaps-and...