Advertisement · 728 × 90
#
Hashtag

#SciCommFridays

Advertisement · 728 × 90
Preview
Scientists’ public engagement goals: Perceived importance and personal prioritization - John C. Besley, Anthony Dudo, 2025 | John Besley It's a bit on the technical side, but a Public Understanding of Science Journal paper Anthony Dudo and I published late last year provides our more detailed-data-to-date on the impacts scientists want...

Sharing data isn’t the same as communicating it. Turning information into a story, and building relationships goes a long way in building trust.

It’s a helpful shift from “How do I explain my work?” to “Who am I actually trying to connect with?” #SciCommFridays

www.linkedin.com/posts/john-b...

1 0 1 0
Bar chart showing a decrease in the percentage of college-educated respondents who feel strongly that science benefits them. In 2020, the value is 69 percent. In 2024, the value is 38 percent. The chart shows a clear decline over time. Source: Research!America.

Bar chart showing a decrease in the percentage of college-educated respondents who feel strongly that science benefits them. In 2020, the value is 69 percent. In 2024, the value is 38 percent. The chart shows a clear decline over time. Source: Research!America.

We don’t talk enough about how people experience science in everyday life.

About 1 in 3 Americans don’t feel scientists’ work benefits them.

That’s a big disconnect.

Closing that gap starts with how we show up, listen, and connect with our communities. #SciCommFridays

3 0 0 2
Post image

Only about 1 in 3 Americans can name a living scientist. Research!America has shown that people value science, but personal connection is still missing.

That gap between interest and connection is where science communication really matters.

Join us for #SciCommFridays for tips & resources!

0 1 0 0