Watching the North Dakota privacy hearing, and all these invocations of "Big Tech" and concern about using browsing history to target people seem to forget the aims of the #broadbandprivacy rules...
Sounds like a fun brief! @wendyndavis discussing @knightcolumbia #broadbandprivacy brief:
Amicus briefs in defense of the Maine #broadbandprivacy law are fun reads. @accessnow and @OTI throwing some serious shade on #VPN usage:
So @ACAConnects, @CTIA, @NCTAitv, and @USTelecom decided to celebrate Valentine's Day by asking a federal court to declare Maine's #broadbandprivacy law unconstitutional:
(5) I completely agree that state-by-state regulation is less than ideal, but in the case of #broadbandprivacy, we had a clear set of federal rules that ISPs fought to repeal without putting anything else in place. Are we shocked states responded?
So @TechFreedom's @IAtheTeapot has a Hill op-ed out attacking Maine's #broadbandprivacy effort. The privacy practices of ISPs seem to be a hill people will fight over for all time, but as always, I had some thoughts. Six actually:
Great overview of Maine’s “new” #broadbandprivacy law from @DLTsays, with a very relevant and important practice tip for @PrivacyPros:
Charter wants affirmative opt-in consent. No prechecked boxes. Sounds good...sounds like #broadbandprivacy rules.
#Broadbandprivacy will never die. (I mean, it did, but ISPs sorta opened Pandora’s box.)
Ha! @RepMcNerney is “wary” of the other side on privacy, calling out the #broadbandprivacy rollback. #AtlanticPrivacy
The potential for irony here is strong... #broadbandprivacy
Folks following the @caprivacyorg California Consumer Privacy Act effort -- so #AB375, which originally dealt with #broadbandprivacy, is the vehicle for the latest legislative effort:
Sure sure. Critics argue California privacy measure "doesn't make necessary distinctions" unlike #broadbandprivacy measures. But I thought ISPs weren't "essentially like paid utilities"?
Comical mischaracterization by FCC's O'Reilly that #broadbandprivacy rules would have "upended consumer expectations and preferences, and created asymmetrical obligations on the companies that have the least amount of access to consumers’ online data."
Just last week, @CenDemTech dealt with opposition to #broadbandprivacy on grounds it would sic hackers onto kids! 2/
Any experts on Dormant Commerce Clause? @RoslynLayton argues #AB375 #broadbandprivacy bill violates Constitution:
Is it amusing or sad #AB375 #broadbandprivacy opponents resorting to astroturf ads of kids threatened by hackers?
Anyone else feel like ISPs are just playing shell games when it comes to #NetNeutrality and #broadbandprivacy?
The BROWSER Act is a problematic approach to #broadbandprivacy, writes @CenDemTech's @MichelleDeMooy:
So #Broadbandprivacy CRA removed "important clarifications" related to CPNI, which USTelecom wants FCC to revisit:
#Broadbandprivacy Online: AT&T To Charge Extra For Protections:
Will #AB375 #broadbandprivacy lead to state patchwork? @ConsumerFed: Sure, but ISPs have only themselves to blame.
Help us, California, #AB375 is our only hope for #broadbandprivacy!
.@CenDemTech has taken a stab at annotating Blackburn's BROWSER Act on #broadbandprivacy -- welcome feedback:
Starting to seem like #broadbandprivacy politics is a game of four-dimensional chess.
Hmm, so Seattle up and decided to make its own #broadbandprivacy rule:
State #broadbandprivacy is a "a great irony" for industry:
"You know, nobody’s got to use the internet..." #Broadbandprivacy
Cable company reps are visiting my apartment building next week. Tempted to go an ask them about #broadbandprivacy...
So @RepKevinCramer, when will you be releasing your browser history? Sure Soros is interested... #Broadbandprivacy