#Mike #Lee (UT): The legal "laundering" expert. He is using the #OBBBA’s #fine #print to argue that the President has the "inherent authority" to deploy ICE as a domestic police force, #bypassing the #Posse #Comitatus #Act.

The historical origins of Freemasonry There is controversy about the date of the beginning of Freemasonry. There is a group that believes that it was established during the era of the Pharaohs – when temples and pyramids were bei…

#linehan
#polanski
#comitatus
#huntsville
#gonet
#origins

The historical origins of Freemasonry There is controversy about the date of the beginning of Freemasonry. There is a group that believes that it was established during the era of the Pharaohs – when temples and pyramids were bei…

#julgamento
#jueces
#comitatus
#rayman
#breyer
#FreePalestine 🇵🇸

where the French knight Heude Payne and eight other knights met and swore among themselves to form an association of them with the aim of protecting and guarding Christian pilgrims from the coast to the Holy City.

United States District Court Northern District of Califomia 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:25-cv-04870-CRB Document 98 Filed 06/24/25 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 25-cv-04870-CRB ORDER DIRECTING FILING DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. On Monday, both parties responded to the Court's request for briefing as to its continued jurisdiction. See PI. Supp. Br. (dkt. 94); Def. Supp. Br. (dkt. 95). Plaintiffs' brief included a request for leave to take "expedited, limited discovery as to their claim that Defendants have acted ultra vires of the [Posse Comitatus Act] and as to the permissible scope and duration of the federalization of the National Guard under Section 12406." See Pl. Supp. Br. at 7. Plaintiffs propose that they propound discovery by June 26, meet and confer with Defendants shortly thereafter, receive responses and conduct depositions by July 11, and file supplemental briefing on the motion for preliminary injunction on July 15. Id. at 9. Defendants object to the discovery request, arguing that "Defendants have had no opportunity to respond and would be prejudiced if the request were granted without any substantive response from Defendants." Objection (dkt. 97) at 1. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court DIRECTS Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' discovery request by Wednesday, June 25, at 9:00 A.M. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2025 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge

⚖️ NEW: in Newsom v. Trump, No. 25-cv-04870 (N.D.Cal) —

Judge Breyer filed an order directing filing today finding GOOD CAUSE! for the State to seek limited, expedited discovery as to whether Trump acted ultra vires of the #Posse #Comitatus #Act.

State would do so by Thur. Govt reply due tmrw AM.

The #Posse #Comitatus #Act generally prohibits active-duty US military personnel from participating in civilian law enforcement activities on US soil, including things like arrests, searches, and investigations. This law aims to prevent the military from being used for domestic law enforcement tasks

Trump authorizes U.S. military to begin occupation of federal land along southern border WASHINGT...

coloradonewsline.com/2025/04/11/repub/trump-m...

#DC #Bureau #Immigration #Donald #Trump #Insurrection #Act […]

[Original post on coloradonewsline.com]