Quote from page 150 of Project 2025:
"Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise
1. Congress should unequivocally authorize state and local law
enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions
in compliance with Arizona v. United States.
11
2. Congress should require compliance with immigration detainers to
the maximum extent consistent with the Tenth Amendment and set
financial disincentives for jurisdictions that implement either official or
unofficial sanctuary policies.
l Prosecutorial discretion. Congress should restrict the authority for
prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting
immigration enforcement.
l Mandatory detention. Congress should eliminate ambiguous
discretionary language in Title 8 that aliens “may” be detained and clarify
that aliens “shall” be detained. This language, which contrasts with other
“shall detain” language in statute, creates unhelpful ambiguity and allows the
executive branch to ignore the will of Congress.
Regulations
l Withdraw Biden Administration regulations and reissue new
regulations in the following areas:
1. Credible Fear/Asylum Jurisdiction for Border Crossers.
2. Public Charge.
l T-Visa and U-Visa reform. Unless and until T and U visas are repealed,
each program needs to be reformed to ensure that only legitimate victims
of trafficking and crimes who are actively providing significant material
assistance to law enforcement are eligible for spots in the queue.
l Repeal TPS designations.
l H-1B reform. Transform the program into an elite mechanism
exclusively to bring in the “best and brightest” at the highest wages while
simultaneously ensuring that U.S. workers are not being disadvantaged by
the program. H-1B is a means only to supplement the U.S. economy and to
keep companies competitive, not to depress U.S. labor markets artificially in
certain industries."
Quote fr/ page 566 of Project 2025:
"Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise
Consistent with appropriations from Congress, the OJP dispenses approxi-
mately $7 billion in various grants. Block grants are given to a state to be awarded
pursuant to federal regulations. Some funds to support law enforcement and
victims of crime are awarded pursuant to block grants. But most OJP funds are
awarded through discretionary grants—specific programs written into the budget
by Congress.
Although Congress dictates the way in which many grant awards are to be
made, federal staff enjoy a tremendous amount of discretion in adding “conditions”
and “priority points.” Grants operate with a carrot and a stick. To receive grant
funding, a recipient must agree to certain conditions, which in many instances
include the President’s priorities. For instance, under an anti–human trafficking
grant during the Obama Administration (approximately $110 million in 2020), an
awardee had to show a partnership with an LGBTQ organization and always have
an interpreter on site. These conditions worked to change culture and overlayed
President Obama’s priorities: support for the LGBTQ community and for more of
the funding to go to areas with large immigrant populations.
During the Trump Administration, a condition added to grants stated that an
awardee had to comply with all federal law (stock language), including federal law
regarding the exchange of information between federal and local authorities about
an individual’s immigration status. This condition prevented law enforcement
in “sanctuary cities” from receiving grant awards. While the Trump Administra-
tion suffered a series of setbacks from several hostile courts, it obtained from the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals a decision upholding the department’s authority
to impose these conditions.92
To ensure that taxpayer-funded grants are prioritized and distributed properly,
the next conservati…
This is straight out of #Project2025.
Per WaPo: "Allies of the president-elect discuss pulling funding from Chicago; mayor says the city is “not intimidated” by threats."
#Deporations #Fascism #Racism #DonaldTrump