Individuality, Enkapsis, and Philosophical Anthropology
What is a thing? Dooyeweerd gets his ideas from Martin Heidenhain (1864-1949), Theodor Haering (1884-1964), and Max Wundt (1879-1963).Their holism was in the German mystical and theosophical tradition.
#Dooyeweerd #philosophy #neo-Calvinism
My article "Two Paths of Reformational Philosophy: Early Writings of Vollenhoven and Dooyeweerd." This is a review and critique of Anthony Tol's Doctoral Dissertation on D.H.Th. Vollenhoven and Herman Dooyeweerd.
jgfriesen.wordpress.com/two-paths-of...
#philosophy #neo-Calvinism #Dooyeweerd
My article, "The Complicity of Reformational Philosophy with the Politics of the Religious Right." Many writers use reformational principles in regressive and reactionary ways to support and to promote the political ideas of the religious right.
#Dooyeweerd
jgfriesen.wordpress.com/herman-dooye...
I have posted a review and critique of Jonathan Chaplin's book "Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society." Chaplin misunderstands enkapsis and individuality structures and so misunderstands the state.
jgfriesen.wordpress.com/herman-dooye...
#neo-Calvinism #Dooyeweerd
I have re-created the massive file linking my translation of excerpts from this work with the Linked Glossary. You can find it on this page on Wordpress
jgfriesen.wordpress.com/herman-dooye...
Click on the link
"Hypertext Translation of Excerpts from Herman Dooyeweerd."
#neo-Calvinism #Dooyeweerd
Coming soon(ish) #neocalvinism #dooyeweerd