How the #nastyfew make the mess we need to compost https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRj65O5RTnc

Original post on hachyderm.io

"To start to compost this mess we need to get back to rebooting an alternative, for twenty years I’ve been arguing that we urgently need to reboot a working alternative. A good place to start is the #openweb as the mainstream web is dominated by corporate platforms tightly coupled to capital and […]

Who are the #nastyfew? – Hamish Campbell

And over and over, the solution is the same: compost them. Turn the piles of #techshit and #NGO mess back into fertile ground. Who are the #nastyfew? hamishcampbell.com/who-are-the-...

Who are the #nastyfew? They are the people who always rise to the top when #mainstreaming takes hold. You see them on TV, in parliament, running #NGOs, managing #dotcons tech projects. On the surface, they don’t always look bad – in fact, they often present as competent, articulate, even charming. But scratch that surface and the pattern is clear: their drive is not shared flourishing, it’s possession and control. This minority #nastyfew, from a historical view are today’s bourgeoisie. Marx outlined (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeoisie), the bourgeoisie historically gained their power through ownership of the means of production – factories, land, capital – while the working class had nothing but their labour to sell. The bourgeoisie used their control over wealth and coercion to keep society in balance, a balance where they stayed on top and everyone else stayed dependent. The same dynamic runs through our present, the #nastyfew work to preserve a status quo that serves them. They exploit labour (waged or unwaged), capture resources, and use subtle or blunt coercion to suppress any change or challenge. Those who hold power – social, technical, financial – remain the #nastyfew unless we actively work to compost them. Then, in our cultural circles, we have our own “common sense” #blocking, the “parasites” who feed from progressive paths. * #fashernistas – chasing visibility, hashtags, and trends instead of substance. They drain energy by endlessly cycling the latest buzzwords while ignoring the compost underneath. * #Blinded dogmatic liberals – well-meaning perhaps, but so trapped in their own ideology that they block radical change without even seeing it. * The wannabe #nastyfew – those who orbit power, adopting the habits of control in hopes of rising up themselves. * Neo-liberals in disguise – the most dangerous, because they consciously wear the clothing of other paths: climate, diversity, openness… while quietly feeding the #deathcult of enclosure, growth, and control. Some of these act blindly, reproducing harmful patterns without much thought. Others are deliberate: they know what they’re doing, and they’re doing it to consolidate control. The unthinking #mainstreaming majority are shadows of the above. They’re not directly malicious, but they absorb the surface story: They repost the slogans. They nod along with “common sense” solutions pushed by the #dotcons and NGOs. They go with the flow, even when the flow is a sewer. Without working composting, they become the mulch for the #nastyfew to grow stronger. The “nice liberals”. Not all liberals are destructive. Sometimes they play a healthy role: They keep projects afloat by doing practical work. They can mediate between radicals and the #mainstreaming. They often mean well, and can be allies if they’re not left holding the steering wheel all the time. They’re not the compost, they’re more like the worms: sometimes useful, sometimes wriggly, but part of the soil cycle. And beyond, there are what has value, the progressive radical paths – both #fluffy (trust, care, openness) and #spiky (confrontation, defence, rupture). That’s another layer of the compost pile, and deserves its own focus. The key point: the #nastyfew and their parasites will always try to rise up in any fertile ground. The progressive trick is to compost them early – recycle their energy, block their possessiveness, and keep the soil rich for new seeds. * * * To recap, let’s look at some history. When the #openweb reboot began about a decade ago, it was rooted in grassroots values: #4opens, federation, collective governance, affinity trust networks. But as soon as the energy started to gather, the #mainstreamin pushed in: * #Dotcons pivoting into the space – Facebook rebranding as “Meta” and trying to swallow the Fediverse through the #Threads/ActivityPub move. This is enclosure dressed up as “openness”. * Standards capture – The #NGO actors increasingly gatekeeper the “neglected” #W3C processes, pushing, more corporate-driven priorities while blocking messy grassroots paths that did the shovelling to grow the reboot during the seedling years. * Control of resources – a few “elitist” individuals began hoarding power over infrastructure, domain names, and repos, reproducing the same top-down model we’re supposed to be escaping. The result? We are seeing the #mainstreaming channelling energy away from collective growth into more controlled, branded silos. The Fediverse started as messy, small-scale, radical. But the same pattern repeated: * SocialHub degeneration – once the buzzing hub for ActivityPub, it decayed into a handful of blockers. The sometimes competent-and-charming surface masks a deeper instinct for control. Threads stagnate, dissent is suppressed, and the soil turns barren. * Mastodon centralization – while #Mastodon has been vital, its dominance has also let a single dev-team shape the Fediverse “common sense”. That concentration of reputation and technical control looks very much like a wannabe mini-bourgeois class rising. * #NGO incursions – funded NGOs present themselves as allies, but bring managerialism, paywalls thinking, and “stakeholder” logic. Instead of composting conflict, they plaster over it with workshops and careerism. Then #block the people who complain. This is the #Fediverse version of “workers remain workers, employers remain employers”: contributors remain contributors, gatekeepers remain gatekeepers. We face the issue of possession over collaboration – we see that collectives fracture when individuals cling to admin roles, mailing lists, funds, and leadership positions. Possession rots trust and then groups wither. The people who hold (and hored) resources, contacts, and media attention become more deadened than path, even if they started with good intentions. The composting lesson, is that over and over, the #nastyfew and their parasites repeat the bourgeois pattern at scale: They present as competent and charming. They consolidate possession and control. They preserve the status quo by suppressing dissent. And over and over, the solution is the same: compost them. Turn the piles of #techshit and #NGO mess back into fertile ground. Protect the seeds of grassroots tech trust, keep the social soil messy and alive. The #OMN is based on human beings doing the right thing. And they will not, and it will fail. Human beings doing the right thing, and they will not, and it will fail. And they will not, and it will fail. And will fail. This is the challenge in the era of the #deathcult: A culture that feeds on fear, on greed, on possession. Seeds are planted, but the soil is poisoned. Trust is offered, but hands close into fists. A path is drawn, but the walkers scatter into shadows. The #OMN is fragile, a thin green shoot in a field of ash. It asks the simplest thing: Do the right thing. Not once, but again, and again, and again. And if we do not? It will fail. And if we do? Perhaps, a seed will take root, and grow beyond the compost, beyond the #deathcult, into the messy, open, living forest. * * * ### Discover more from Hamish Campbell Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email. Type your email… Subscribe

And over and over, the solution is the same: compost them. Turn the piles of #techshit and #NGO mess back into fertile ground. Who are the #nastyfew? https://hamishcampbell.com/who-are-the-nastyfew/

Original post on mastodon.scot

"What we actually need is a radical shift, that builds on grassroots cooperation, trust, and open systems. Not more shiny ethical #dotcons platforms or visionary #nastyfew billionaires, but boring, solid, stubborn collective action. We need commons, not commodities. Federation, not feudalism. We […]

Original post on mastodon.social

@Edent the subject would be something uncomfortable like this "The careerist #NGO tech elitists: Yes, even the “good” sector can be captured. NGO professionals who endlessly hold conferences and produce whitepapers while blocking actual grassroots projects. They take seats at tables designed to […]

The #nastyfew in the era of #climatechaos and social breakdown – Hamish Campbell

Added a @rabble video to the post. The #nastyfew in the era of #climatechaos and social breakdown hamishcampbell.com/understandin...

The #nastyfew: human parasites in the era of #climatechaos and social breakdown – Hamish Campbell

The #nastyfew: human parasites in the era of #climatechaos and social breakdown. So what do we do? First, see clearly, name the parasitism. Understand that systems don’t just fail; they are designed to benefit the few and contain the many. hamishcampbell.com/understandin...

First step: Stop being a prat – Hamish Campbell

Why it matters, because the #nastyfew people seizing power right now. First step: Stop being a prat hamishcampbell.com/first-step-s...

#Fashionistas in Activism: How Buzzword Chasing Undermines Real Change – Hamish Campbell

This post is about controlling the narrative, not letting the #nastyfew dictate the terms of engagement. #Fashionistas in Activism: How Buzzword Chasing Undermines Real Change hamishcampbell.com/fashionistas...

The hard right path, the #nastyfew playing the Nazi card – Hamish Campbell

This is what happens when you let narratives drift unmoored from social history. The hard right path, the #nastyfew playing the Nazi card hamishcampbell.com/in-the-hard-...

The #nastyfew, billionaires funders fear, informed, educated public – Hamish Campbell

The #nastyfew are now building bunkers, literally, escaping with their bodyguards when the shit hits the fan. The #nastyfew, billionaires funders fear, informed, educated public hamishcampbell.com/the-nastyfew...

To remember our own history – Hamish Campbell

To remember our own history hamishcampbell.com/to-remember-... A part of this plain talking, calling out the #nastyfew instead of talking vaguely about ‘elites.’ Let’s name the problem, plant the seeds, and grow the alternatives.

A sharp take, systems are visibly broken – Hamish Campbell

We already know how the far right wins, they appeal to real feelings of injustice, then twist those feelings into #stupidindividualism that serves their own #nastyfew class interests. A sharp take, systems are visibly broken hamishcampbell.com/a-sharp-take/

We can now talk about composting, the privatisation of our “commons” – Hamish Campbell

Essential natural “commons” services and utilities were turned into “profit” drains for the #nastyfew at the expense of affordability and quality for the meany. We can now talk about composting, the privatisation of our “commons” hamishcampbell.com/we-should-ta...

To remember our own history – Hamish Campbell

A part of this defence is calling out the #nastyfew instead of talking vaguely about ‘elites.’ Let’s name the problem, plant the seeds, and grow the alternatives. To remember our own history hamishcampbell.com/to-remember-...

#Fashionistas in Activism: How Buzzword Chasing Undermines Real Change – Hamish Campbell

The best revenge against the #nastyfew is simple: don’t talk about them at all. What fuels them is attention — the endless cycle of fixating on their every move. #Fashionistas in Activism: How Buzzword Chasing Undermines Real Change hamishcampbell.com/fashionistas...