Judging research on its own merits: How MetaROR supports better research assessment | DORA MetaResearch Open Review (MetaROR), and other publish-review-curate platforms (e.g., Copernicus, eLife, F1000, Open Research Europe, Peer Community In) challenge the current state of scholarly publish...

Judging research on its own merits: How MetaROR (MetaResearch Open Review) supports better research assessment vía @dorassessment.bsky.social

#ResearchAssessment #OpenScience #MetaScience #MetaResearch #OpenReviews

Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature’s research papers From today, all new submissions to Nature that are published will be accompanied by referees’ reports and author responses — to illuminate the process of producing rigorous science.

Desde hoy, todos los nuevos artículos publicados en @nature.com irán acompañados de los informes de los revisores y respuestas de los autores

#OpenScience #OpenReviews

Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity Abstract. I make six arguments for why double-blind peer review practices increase vulnerability to scientific integrity lapses over more transparent peer

En este art. @cmebane.bsky.social presenta 6 argumentos por los que las revisiones de doble ciego aumentan el riesgo de erosionar la integridad de la #ciencia frente a las fortalezas de las revisiones abiertas

Las #openreviews son uno de los elementos fundamentales de la #cienciaabierta #opensience

existing Wikipedia article. #openaccess #openreviews #publishYourReviews #wikipedia @cognition@a.gup.pe #perception #visionscience (2/2)