2/2
3. What about police ORDERING “Tits IN for the cops!”?
Why/how is unprovoked REQUEST/APPEAL for clothing removal LESS
- gendered
- sexually objectifying
- harassment
than unprovoked MANDATING (#consent be damned) of breast-contacting #overwear ?
#ObsceneExposure law
@australia.theguardian.com

IF it is true for #embodied you that
- underwear is more like #OVERwear &
- to put CLOTHES ON minimises that you place/squeeze YOUR BODY INTO—INSIDE of containing—confining—engulfing—submerging clothes,
why not reclaim—repossess your personal voice from a group narrative?
#LetSurfaceAnatomyResurface

2/2
We all start human
1. ‘ADULT’ stories about DANGEROUS #sex are taught to children (#adultophobia) & FEAR/paranoia installed
2. police, programmed with moral distortions, pre-#criminalise The Human BODY &
3. DEMAND preemptive #coverup — #OVERwear +
4/5. OUTERwear
6. ‘ROYAL’/‘HOLY’-wear
@hrw.org

This rough draft is an attempt to represent that LAYERS of STORY are embedded in MANDATED-for-'corrective'-#modesty (of PRE-#sexualised bodies) clothing
1. 'BAD' ('OBSCENE') body
2. so POLICED body
3. 'UNDERDRESSED' in #OVERwear
4. 'FULLY dressed'
#ObsceneExposure #lawfare
@elainepearson.bsky.social

#Survival is NOT an option!
Mandatory
1. ERASURE/DISPLACEMENT of ‘X’, &
2. REPLACEMENT of 'X' WITH 'Y'
describes anything BUT the 'SURVIVAL' of the original 'X'-inclusive/'Y'-less being.
Under #ObsceneExposure #lawfare
'X' = "genital & anal areas + female breasts"
'Y' = #overwear
@hrw.org

#Survival is NOT an option!
Mandatory
1. ERASURE/DISPLACEMENT of X &
2. REPLACEMENT of X with Y
describes anything BUT the 'SURVIVAL' of the original X-inclusive and Y-less being.
Under #ObsceneExposure #lawfare
X = "genital and anal areas + female breasts"
Y = #overwear
@elainepearson.bsky.social