Another plug for our latest article by @jontreadway.bsky.social about the different emerging versions of metascience, and whether any of them care about academic publishing any longer
Posts by Scholarly Futures
@jontreadway.bsky.social ponders on the rise of metascience in todays post and if big data even cares about publishers any more
scholarlyfutures.substack.com/p/the-changi...
This week we have a guest post from @loupeck.bsky.social on the 'click' legacy the industry has been focussed on for quite a long time. Let us know what you think!
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
This week we look at the economies of Open Science - and how it might not be about the economy after all
#openscience #openresearch
A message about @roobina.bsky.social from the whole Scholarly Futures team
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
This week's Substack from @jontreadway.bsky.social looks at the paradox facing mission-driven remote organisations within the research and scholarly communications ecosystem
scholarlyfutures.substack.com/p/mission-dr...
It's a complicated one #STM #scholarlycommunications
International Women's Day is nearly here - come and see what we think about gender equality in scholarly communications open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
#IWD #ScholarlyCommunications #ScholarlyPublishing
A magnifying glass seen lying on a laptop keyboard. Bold green text asks: COULD WE GET AHEAD OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY ISSUES?
Scholarly communication has been a high-trust industry, but faces significant challenges if it is to remain so. Is there a way we can get ahead of research integrity issues while maintaining a system based on trust? Latest from @roobina.bsky.social on our Substack 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Is something truly ever free? We dig into the issues and impact of Diamond OA and ask 'who is going to pay?'
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Text, white on dark blue, reads: if the economics make sense, should we pay peer reviewers? Scholarlyfutures.substack.com Scholarly Futures Below this a pale blue background with red white blue and black paper confetti exploding.
Debates about paying peer reviewers go back and forth, but @grnr25.bsky.social presents experience of doing just that at a small, gold OA journal. The economics make sense. Find out why 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Our first guest post! Emma Green @majordoma.bsky.social attended last week's APE conference and pondered whether we are truly doing enough to transform the industry in the face of current challenges. What do you think? 🤔
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
The latest post on our Scholarly Futures Substack is live and digs into how AI is used in peer review. It aids in technical checks & helps reviewers with their reports. But is there any governance or best practice out there? By @roobina.bsky.social 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
A brutalist building with an unlit neon sign saying 'the future' with blue sky behind it. A white caption reads: What to expect in scholarly communications in 2026 Or what AI believes could occur... Scholarly Futures Scholarlyfutures.substack.com
Lots of predictions out there about the year ahead, so we asked AIs what they thought would happen in scholarly communications in 2026. AI predicts more AI! Do you agree?
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
@roobina.bsky.social @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @jontreadway.bsky.social @grnr25.bsky.social
A gnome figurine in front of a red background. White text reads: Christmas Gifts. Some on and off topic recommendations from the SchFuCrew. Scholarly Futures ScholarlyFutures.substack.com
Instead of scholarly communication or academic publishing, this week we share on and off topic content we have enjoyed this year. Plus @grnr25.bsky.social shares some lessons learned @jontreadway.bsky.social @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @roobina.bsky.social open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity has been relatively quiet in 2025, releasing just two misconduct findings with only two weeks remaining in the year — the fewest the office has released since at least 2006. ORI typically releases an average of about 10 findings a year.
Last week I attended the #STMInnovation and #STMIntegrity days in London.
I believe the scholarly research ecosystem needs to change in a pretty substantial way if we're to face in to the societal threats that have emerged.
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/12/17/w...
Very much enjoyed last week's meeting in Cambridge about the Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) model for scholarly publishing. There were lots of highly inspiring discussions, including an important discussion about strengthening coordination between initiatives in this area.
asapbio.org/reimagining-...
White text on a red background on the top half of the image. The bottom half is a light bulb. Text reads: Innovation with receipts. What can we infer from the winners of The Vesalius Innovation Award about developments in the research workflow and ecosystem over the six years since the annual award was first given?
Latest post by @jontreadway.bsky.social explores what the shortlist and winners of the Vesalius Innovation Award say about changes in the research workflow system.
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
📣 On demand: Watch our webinar with Research Information and see how publishers can scale #ResearchIntegrity checks with the Dimensions Author Check API.
Presented by Dr Leslie McIntosh & Tyler Ruse.
🔗 See the webinar now: https://ow.ly/Rfzf50XGcff
#scholcomm
White text on a blue background reads: AI calls time on curation. Will AI stop new curation lead publishing models thriving before they've even had a chance to grow? Scholarly Futures looks into the publish, read, curate model and the potential impact of AI. ScholarlyFutures.substack.com
Will AI help or hinder the Publish, Read, Curare model? New post from @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social for our Substack 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
🚀 Big news for open research information!
From 2026, @cnrs.fr will no longer have institutional access to Web of Science.
This move aligns with the vision of the Barcelona Declaration and shows how institutions can operationalise the transition to open systems.
🔗 www.cnrs.fr/en/update/cn...
Screenshot from a flyer that reads: Public Lecture on Scientific Integrity Dr. Elisabeth Bik Errors and Misconduct in Biomedical Research Images Science builds upon science. Even after peer-review and publication, science papers could still contain images or other data of concern. If not addressed, papers containing incorrect or even falsified data could lead to wasted time and money spent by other researchers trying to reproduce those results. Several high-profile cases of science misconduct have been reported, but many more remain undetected. Elisabeth Bik is an image forensics detective who left her paid job in industry to search for and report biomedical articles that contain errors or data of concern. She has conducted a systematic review of 20,000 papers across 40 journals and found that approximately 4% of these contained inappropriately duplicated images. In her talk, she will present her work and show several types of inappropriately duplicated images and other examples of research misconduct. In addition, she will discuss how Artificial Intelligence can both help identify cases of misconduct and also create them, as well as the growing threat of scientific paper mills. On the occasion of the Dies academicus of the University of Bern on 6th December 2025, Elisabeth Bik will receive an honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Science for her groundbreaking work and untiring commitment to scientific integrity. Friday 5th December 2025, 4pm Aula, 2nd floor, Main Building, Hochschulstrasse 4. Also see this link: https://www.vetsuisse.unibe.ch/e58/e1479157/e1624857/e1753357/Elisabeth_Bik_flyer_2025_A3_20251104_ger.pdf
This afternoon, I will give a public lecture about #ResearchIntegrity and #ImageForensics, at the University of Bern, CH, where I will receive an honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Science tomorrow.
Thank you for your support ❤️
🚨 Webinar Alert 👉 Dec 4 @ 10am ET
What does #GenAI do well and where does it fail without supporting tech?
We’ll explore how knowledge graphs, symbolic reasoning & more can help GenAI!
🔗 Register: https://ow.ly/QGVI50Xx7y3
How much further can consolidation go in scholarly publishing, and could winds of change blow in from elsewhere to reshape the market, perhaps even ‘disrupt’ the way things are done? Latest by @roobina.bsky.social 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Sunset over snowy hills seen from UiT campus
Excellent start to #Munin2025 with the panel on open #metadata with perspectives from @barcelonadori.bsky.social, @doaj.bsky.social, @oa2020.org, @pkp.sfu.ca and SCOAP3 @cern.bsky.social.
Followed by the beautiful sight of the final sunset of the year from UiT Campus
Fascinating post by @jontreadway.bsky.social this week about the 'Chuna Cycle' and how well it could map onto academic publishing. Find out more 👇
Is there a major health crisis coming for STM publishing? @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social shares her thoughts on the @stmassoc.bsky.social day that runs adjacent to the Frankfurt Book Fair: 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...