Fact-checking Matt Ridley’s “Scientific Freedom Lecture” at NIH (Part III) pandemonium.hypotheses.org/1260
Posts by
In 2022, @vanityfair.com and @propublica.org reported a "Complex and Grave Situation" in Wuhan.
Analysis by @katherineeban.bsky.social and @jeffykao.bsky.social was based on a farscical investigation led by Bob Kadlec.
This post shows how they were duped by a half-billion dollar air conditioner.
In March, Matt Ridley gave the inaugural "Scientific Freedom Lecture" at NIH, on a lab leak origin of COVID-19.
The talk was so full of misrepresentations, omissions, falsehoods and lies that I will need several blog posts to debunk it. Here's Part I:
pandemonium.hypotheses.org/995
🧪 #covidorigin
I have written about how one-sided @kgandersen.bsky.social lecture from 2024 was portrayed in Khrono. I doubt that he agrees with Sigrid Bratlie’s representation of the lecture. www.khrono.no/svak-kildekr...
Matt Ridley gave the inaugural "NIH Scientific Freedom Lecture Series" earlier today and I just wanted to run through some of the main claims he made - you'll be unsurprised to learn that almost all of them are false.
Here's his summary slide - let's start there.
🧵👇
I have been listening to @theskepticsguide.bsky.social since I was a graduate student!
It was therefore a great pleasure to join this weeks show to talk about the origin of COVID-19. One of the most succinct and on-point interviews I have done on the topic!
www.theskepticsguide.org/podcasts/epi...
Brilliant work. Taking the time to dismantle these narratives is vital. Please keep it up! 👏
Read @flodebarre.bsky.social's original analysis: pandemonium.hypotheses.org/898.
While the original WeChat post is bonkers, it points to unreleased data from the market, including:
1️⃣ Potentially infected animals in "Stall A" - the hot-spot inside the market.
2️⃣ +Serology of vendor from Stall A.
This is a pretty interesting unsolved mystery. How did a 2021 social media post linked to a state propaganda campaign know accurate details about SARS-CoV-2 origins that only came to light later? And if the details we know about were right, could the other fairly shocking details also be true?
Kanskje dine meningsfeller har trukket seg fra debatten fordi de har skjønt at du sprer reinspikka konspirasjonsteorier?
www.khrono.no/mener-uio-dr...
A new little tidbit on the origin saga:
@flodebarre.bsky.social uncovered possibly real insider knowledge within blatant Chinese disinformation
"The maps identify specific stalls as having live animals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and vendors with antibodies to the virus—data China has never shared"
"Men de stiller ikke spørsmålene i søken etter svar. Svarene er uinteressante. De vil bare stille spørsmålene for å kunne gi inntrykk av å være kritiske. Gi inntrykk av å virke nysgjerrige, åpne og kunnskapssøkende."
It's coming together nicely.
#ScienceCounterpunch
If you want to know what two nerdy EU #scicomm guys are doing to @standupforscience.bsky.social, we created a podcast where people in the fight against anti-science share their stories, experience, learnings.
Every friday 5pm UK new amazing guests.
illustration: collage of tweets about the article
Are you familiar with the story of the EMI article?
If not, good for you, you did not waste time with a manufactured controversy aimed to sow distrust.
For the curious, here's how lab leakers tried (and this time, failed) to generate outrage: ▫️1/6 🧵 #covidorigin
Here is a strong-worded takedown video on many lab leak conspiracy peddlers.
I worked with @profdaveexplains.bsky.social on this and it will hit the lableak believers like a meteor.
Please enjoy "scicomm unfiltered":
youtu.be/ra0WKNhQZ0U?...
illustration image, made of a map of Antarctica (NASA svg) and SARS-CoV-2 virus (NIH BioArt)
Are you familiar with the story of the Antarctica sequences?
If not, good for you: you didn't clutter your brain with yet another Covid-origin damp squib, where innocuous data were made to look suspicious by misrepresenting a date.
For the curious, here's the story. ▫️1/9 🧵 #CovidOrigin
My friend @badboyofscience.bsky.social has an awesome new video out.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQnO...
English transcript available below the original text
Disse funnene passer mildt sagt ikke så godt med fortellingene til Sigrid Bratlie om covid‑pandemiens opphav.. @langsiktsenter.bsky.social
Med mindre koronavirusene i jungelen i Brasil har satt inn et "furin cleavage site" på pur f som del av en stor konspirasjon
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
"SARS-CoV-2 is too well-adapted to humans [hence, insert your favorite conspiracy theory]".
That was never right because, for one, SARS-CoV-2 is a pandemic virus so it necessarily had to be "well-adapted".
Now, a new study shows the same is true for BANAL-236 - a related virus isolated from bats.
My interview with Dr. Susan Monarez, former CDC Director, who was fired for doing her job, standing up for public health and science. Learn about her resilience and optimism.
erictopol.substack.com/p/dr-susan-m...
Graphic annotating some of Dr. Andersen's main points from his post onto his figure for prediction of MRCA date. Titled "Estimated date when pandemic genomes started diverging".
Great post. Enough people with minimal background try to over-interpret this that I thought it might help make good faith (but not inside baseball) interpretation easier to quickly annotate your graph with more general explanatory language.
A new bat coronavirus discovered in Brazil confirms what we already knew: nature handles furin cleavage sites just fine.
Lab leakers, don’t worry, you've got the track record to pivot seamlessly to a career in creative fiction writing.
Quick update on the news:
open.substack.com/pub/protagon...
This is 💯 Origin inside baseball, but I've always been perplexed by Baric's claim that our "market" studies could not be correct because, according to him, the molecular timing of the pandemic in in October, not later.
That was always wrong, but where did he get this October date from?
Well... 🧵👇
22-Oct 2022 headline from The Economist A new paper claims SARS-CoV-2 bears signs of genetic engineering But it has yet to be peer reviewed. And others strongly disagree
🧵Remember the preprint claiming SARS-CoV-2 has a "synthetic fingerprint"?
It said a restriction map was "extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution.”
I took its claims seriously.
The "synthetic fingerprint" hypothesis collapses. My new preprint explains why.
arxiv.org/abs/2510.23833
We’ve identified a highly divergent betacoronavirus from South American bat that encodes a functional furin cleavage site.
Another fascinating reminder of how diverse coronavirus evolution is in wildlife reservoirs.
#Virology #VirusEvolution #Bats #Coronavirus
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...