Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Noa Ottilie Borst

🔥New work from the Crocker group @justinmcrocker.bsky.social @embl.org on the mechanistic and evolutionary basis of dominance from cis-regulatory variation in Drosophila Congratulations to Noa @ottilie.bsky.social and all the authors 🥳

2 days ago 4 1 0 0

Come listen to my talk about how enhancers evolve and how promoters emerge from randomly synthesized DNA sequences!

2 weeks ago 23 8 0 2
Interallelic cis-regulatory dominance promotes robustness and evolutionary innovation Dominance is a central principle of genetics, yet the mechanistic basis and the evolutionary consequences of dominance arising from cis-regulatory variation remain poorly understood. We examined the evolutionary trajectories of a pleiotropic developmental enhancer in Drosophila . A genotype–phenotype map between D. melanogaster and D. simulans enhancer sequences reveals extensive epistasis, and many homozygous evolutionary paths reduce transcriptional output. In heterozygotes, however, regulatory dominance masks variants that reduce gene expression, potentially relaxing evolutionary constraints. Using allele-specific reporters and imaging, we show that this dominance arises from interallelic interactions (also known as transvection) reinforced by transcriptional hubs. Importantly, this enhancer dominance is cell-type specific, raising the possibility that it conceals deleterious effects in essential tissues while revealing novel, ectopic activity in others. Interallelic regulatory hubs may therefore expand the range of mutational paths available to diploid genomes while preserving essential transcriptional output. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

New Preprint! When one enhancer allele changes another's regulatory output, is that bad? We found it could be a feature — interallelic cis-regulatory dominance buffers outputs AND enables evolutionary innovation. Two for one!

Led by @ottilie.bsky.social from @embl.org

doi: doi.org/10.64898/202...

1 month ago 40 13 2 0

Thanks so much Luisa! ☀️

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Thanks so much Tim! 💙

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Many thanks to my co-authors @timothyfuqua.bsky.social, @fabianruperti.bsky.social and @justinmcrocker.bsky.social. Please let me know if you have feedback, or want to chat more about this work! (18/18)

1 month ago 5 0 2 0

These results may explain how seemingly fragile cis-regulatory elements preserve their function yet remain evolutionary flexible. (17/18)

1 month ago 2 0 1 0

In this way, gene expression is maintained in the face of potentially disruptive mutations (robustness), while concurrently allowing the exploration of new phenotypic effects in a cryptic or compartmentalized way (innovation). (16/18)

1 month ago 2 1 1 0
Post image

We believe these interallelic hubs can act as evolutionary stepping stones: rather than having a single, uniform phenotypic effect, each enhancer allele can experience a distinct dominance relationship depending on cellular environment and developmental stage. (15/18)

1 month ago 5 1 1 0
Advertisement

Multiple factors may underly the cell type-specificity in dominance strength, such as interallelic pairing strengths, chromatin accessibility, post-transcriptional regulation, competition for TFs, and the chemical properties of the TFs in an interallelic hub. (14/18)

1 month ago 2 0 1 0

Although transvection is dependent on somatic homolog pairing, which has predominantly been characterised in Diptera and budding yeast, interallelic and interchromosomal transcriptional hubs are increasingly recognized across metazoans. (13/18)

1 month ago 2 0 1 0
On the top left, a stage 15 embryo resulting from a cross of the wildtype E3N-lacZ line, integrated at attP2 (chr.3L) with ectopic E3N mutant 145-2 driving lacZ, integrated at attP2 (chr.3L). RNA of both the lacZ and dsRed reporter genes are labeled by HCR RNA-FISH. On the right to it, a violin plot showing the difference in Ubx concentration between colocalized (green) and non-colocalized (purple) transcription sites of lacZ and dsRed. Colocalized sites exhibit significantly higher Ubx intensity compared to non-colocalized loci. A pie chart summarizes the proportion of observations in each category. On the left bottom, a close-up of a nucleus (in blue, DAPI) in the ventral zone, highlighted by a dotted-striped rectangle in the image above it. Separation of the different channels reveals colocalization of lacZ and dsRed nascent RNA at a shared transcription site, accompanied by a local enrichment of Ubx protein. On the right to this, a 3D surface plot of Ubx protein levels from antibody staining of the nucleus mentioned before. Ubx signal is shown in arbitrary units (AU) on a 0-255 scale, and presence of lacZ and dsRed signal is depicted in magenta and green, respectively. On the right to that, a schematic of the interallelic transcriptional hub for the genotype described before.

On the top left, a stage 15 embryo resulting from a cross of the wildtype E3N-lacZ line, integrated at attP2 (chr.3L) with ectopic E3N mutant 145-2 driving lacZ, integrated at attP2 (chr.3L). RNA of both the lacZ and dsRed reporter genes are labeled by HCR RNA-FISH. On the right to it, a violin plot showing the difference in Ubx concentration between colocalized (green) and non-colocalized (purple) transcription sites of lacZ and dsRed. Colocalized sites exhibit significantly higher Ubx intensity compared to non-colocalized loci. A pie chart summarizes the proportion of observations in each category. On the left bottom, a close-up of a nucleus (in blue, DAPI) in the ventral zone, highlighted by a dotted-striped rectangle in the image above it. Separation of the different channels reveals colocalization of lacZ and dsRed nascent RNA at a shared transcription site, accompanied by a local enrichment of Ubx protein. On the right to this, a 3D surface plot of Ubx protein levels from antibody staining of the nucleus mentioned before. Ubx signal is shown in arbitrary units (AU) on a 0-255 scale, and presence of lacZ and dsRed signal is depicted in magenta and green, respectively. On the right to that, a schematic of the interallelic transcriptional hub for the genotype described before.

Using a two-color reporter assay we then showed colocalization of the two transcription sites in a "dominant" cell type, which was accompanied by a higher concentration of the activator Ubx. This suggests that interallelic transcription hubs underlie the interactions between the alleles. (12/18)

1 month ago 3 0 1 0

So what is the mechanism underlying this regulatory dominance? By removing, replacing and transporting different cis-regulatory elements we showed proximity-dependent, transvection-like interactions between the enhancers alleles. (11/18)

1 month ago 2 1 1 0

Overall, we see cell type-specific differences in the degrees of dominance within an embryo, where in some cell types mutant activity is observed, and in others it is fully repressed. This type of dominance allows for a mosaic regulatory outcome that promotes robustness and innovation. (10/18)

1 month ago 3 0 1 0
On the left, representative images of a homozygous wildtype E3N-lacZ, homozygous mutant 145-2-lacZ, and a heterozygous embryo at stage 15. The embryo is stained with a β-gal antibody against the lacZ reporter protein β-gal. 
Marked in a mustard-yellow box is the region of abdominal stripe 2 (A2) where β-gal reporter intensity was measured across embryos. Marked in blue circles are the wing and haltere discs where β-gal reporter intensity was measured across embryos. On the right, boxplots of the mean fluorescence intensity of the β-gal reporter within the A2 stripe, and the wing and haltere discs, haltere disc of different embryos of the 145-2 E3N variant at stage 15.

On the left, representative images of a homozygous wildtype E3N-lacZ, homozygous mutant 145-2-lacZ, and a heterozygous embryo at stage 15. The embryo is stained with a β-gal antibody against the lacZ reporter protein β-gal. Marked in a mustard-yellow box is the region of abdominal stripe 2 (A2) where β-gal reporter intensity was measured across embryos. Marked in blue circles are the wing and haltere discs where β-gal reporter intensity was measured across embryos. On the right, boxplots of the mean fluorescence intensity of the β-gal reporter within the A2 stripe, and the wing and haltere discs, haltere disc of different embryos of the 145-2 E3N variant at stage 15.

In one homozygous variant, the embryo gains ectopic enhancer activity in wing and haltere discs, while losing activity in the native ventral zone. In the heterozygous embryo, ventral activity is fully restored to WT levels, while we only see partial dominance of the WT allele in the discs. (9/18)

1 month ago 3 0 1 0

We then asked, could a wild-type allele also decrease pleiotropic expression caused by enhancer mutations? For this, we looked at multiple synthetic E3N enhancer variants we previously created. (8/18)

1 month ago 2 0 1 0
A comparison of one of the evolutionary trajectories from mel to sim when every step is homozygous (represented as circles) versus heterozygous (squares), where one allele remains mel up until the last step to sim. Below are representative embryos from some of the variants shown.

A comparison of one of the evolutionary trajectories from mel to sim when every step is homozygous (represented as circles) versus heterozygous (squares), where one allele remains mel up until the last step to sim. Below are representative embryos from some of the variants shown.

We tested two scenarios: in one, mutations accumulate in a homozygous manner from mel to sim. In the other, mutations accumulate on only one allele, and the other remains "mel" until the end. We observed dominance among heterozygous mutational steps that masked expression-reducing mutations. (7/18)

1 month ago 2 0 1 0

Since new mutations arise in single copies, natural selection initially acts on heterozygous genotypes in diploids. Therefore, we wondered how this genotype-phenotyope landscape might be navigated via heterozygous intermediates. (6/18)

1 month ago 2 0 1 0
Advertisement
Example of epistasis in the evolutionary trajectory of E3N. Variant 01000 has a significant negative effect on the nuclear β-gal intensity of mel (00000) (ε1 = -0.278, p = 0.016), whereas variant 00001 has no significant effect (ε1 = -0.089, p = 0.132) on mel. When the two variants are combined, there is a positive epistatic effect on the nuclear β-gal intensity of mel (ε2 = 0.468, p = 0.005). On the left there is a barplot showing this, and on the right there are representative embryos from each line.

Example of epistasis in the evolutionary trajectory of E3N. Variant 01000 has a significant negative effect on the nuclear β-gal intensity of mel (00000) (ε1 = -0.278, p = 0.016), whereas variant 00001 has no significant effect (ε1 = -0.089, p = 0.132) on mel. When the two variants are combined, there is a positive epistatic effect on the nuclear β-gal intensity of mel (ε2 = 0.468, p = 0.005). On the left there is a barplot showing this, and on the right there are representative embryos from each line.

In addition, we also observe non-additive effects between combinations of different mutational events (epistasis), both pairwise and higher-order, which has been suggested to constrain enhancer evolution. (5/18)

1 month ago 4 0 1 0
On the left representative embryos for every line in the combinatorial E3N library showing the differences in the striped gene expression pattern of the lacZ reporter. On the right the combinatorial evolutionary paths showing the possible intermediate forms from the genetic E3N sequence of melanogaster (mel) to simulans (sim). Shown colors represent the average nuclear intensity

On the left representative embryos for every line in the combinatorial E3N library showing the differences in the striped gene expression pattern of the lacZ reporter. On the right the combinatorial evolutionary paths showing the possible intermediate forms from the genetic E3N sequence of melanogaster (mel) to simulans (sim). Shown colors represent the average nuclear intensity

Many mutational combinations in this genotype-phenotype map markedly alter enhancer activity, which is in stark contrast to the limited natural variation and conserved regulatory output observed in the D. melanogaster E3N enhancer. (4/18)

1 month ago 2 1 1 0
Sequence alignment of E3N in D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and below an evolutionary tree of the melanogaster species subgroup showing the changes in the E3N enhancer since the divergence of D. melanogaster and D. simulans 1.4-3.4 Mya, and the divergence of erecta complex 3.4-12 Mya. Here, ACD is the most likely ancestral version of the enhancer given the modern-day sequence of D. erecta.

Sequence alignment of E3N in D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and below an evolutionary tree of the melanogaster species subgroup showing the changes in the E3N enhancer since the divergence of D. melanogaster and D. simulans 1.4-3.4 Mya, and the divergence of erecta complex 3.4-12 Mya. Here, ACD is the most likely ancestral version of the enhancer given the modern-day sequence of D. erecta.

We examined the evolutionary trajectories of a fragile, pleiotropic enhancer by testing the enhancer activity of all the intermediate sequences between the D. melanogaster and D. simulans E3N enhancer, who diverged 1-3 Mya. (3/18)

1 month ago 4 0 1 0

Enhancers often exhibit high degrees of mutational fragility, yet across evolution many of their expression patterns remain conserved: how can enhancers accumulate mutations and acquire new functions without compromising developmental programs? (2/18)

1 month ago 3 0 1 0

Excited to share my first preprint from my PhD w/ @justinmcrocker.bsky.social. We show that cell type-specific regulatory dominance promotes robustness and evolutionary innovation through interallelic transcriptional hubs, potentially expanding the mutational paths available to diploids. (1/18)

1 month ago 42 22 1 3
Post image

New preprint from the lab! We identify the ZnF protein Mulberry as a condensation-dependent structural regulator of genome topology that organizes “multi-way regulatory hubs” in early Drosophila embryos.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

2 months ago 39 16 0 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Just discovered the wonderful covers of 'Genes to Cells', the journal of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan @mbsj-official.bsky.social – absolutely beautiful!

here some examples inspired by mitosis, CRISPR, the DNA helix, and plant pigments

2 months ago 127 44 6 5
Preview
Long-term evolution of regulatory DNA sequences. Part 1: Simulations on global, biophysically-realistic genotype-phenotype maps Promoters and enhancers are cis-regulatory elements (CREs), DNA sequences that bind transcription factor (TF) proteins to up- or down-regulate target genes. Decades-long efforts yielded TF-DNA interac...

🧬✨ New 2-part review on the evolution of regulatory DNA (enhancers & promoters)! What started as conversations between Gasper Tkačik @istaresearch.bsky.social and our group @embl.org grew into a broader synthesis.

Preprints here:
Part 1: arxiv.org/abs/2601.19681
Part 2: arxiv.org/abs/2601.21480

2 months ago 11 5 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

✨This week at the DB unit seminar @embl.org, Noa Ottilie Borst, a PhD student in the Crocker group @justinmcrocker.bsky.social presented her work on cell-type-specific interallelic interactions, and how they simultaneously allow for robustness and evolutionary innovation.

5 months ago 16 3 0 0
Home | Timothy Fuqua

Hey y'all, grant-pending, I may be unemployed starting from October. If you have any leads on biotech / postdoc positions in the German-speaking part of Switzerland, I'd greatly appreciate a message. I'm great with Data Analysis, Molecular Biology, and Teaching. (Plz RT!)

More at timothyfuqua.com

9 months ago 4 9 1 0
Preview
Drosophila Genetic Database The Drosophila Genetic Database, FlyBase, is on the brink of collapse due to the sudden termination of the FlyBase NIH grant, which includes salaries for 5 literature curators based at the University ...

#drosophila @flybase.bsky.social request emergency funding:
"As it stands, by the end of July, 2025, there will be no future updates to FlyBase, and in the worst case scenario access to the website will also be lost" => please donate!

www.philanthropy.cam.ac.uk/give-to-camb...

10 months ago 82 102 3 17
Preview
Leaving synthetic pesticides behind

Leaving synthetic pesticides behind | Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Nice write-up on our work from @embl.org, along with possible solutions.

11 months ago 9 3 0 0