Wrote about the new approaches people are taking to building climate models: km-resolution, automated tuning, ML emulators…
Climate has benefited from having 10s of models to test and compare, now we have new dimensions of model diversity to learn from
notesonclimate.substack.com/p/the-many-p...
Posts by Nick Lutsko
I think they are confusing changes in extremes with day-to-day predictability
This is a fun piece about the design challenge of communicating uncertainty in weather apps (though I’d quibble with the claim that climate change is making weather more unpredictable)
www.newyorker.com/culture/infi...
This looks useful: 'Emulating Natural Climate Variability With InVERT (Internal Variability Emulator for Regional Temperature)' agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
Back to basics: if we want to understand the pattern effect we need to think about wave dynamics
Hi Ray, I agree with the sentiment (though they claim no extra fuel was burned on these flights). For me the real advance here is the ability to accurately forecast contrails, which could be a useful tool for learning about ice clouds
Eg www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Still, the reduction in contrails suggests the forecasting system can accurately predict when&where clear sky contrails (at least as picked up by GOES) will form. Given all the unknowns about contrails this is an exciting tool that we could learn a lot from
There’s a fun new study by Google & American Airlines optimizing flight paths to reduce contrails
blog.google/innovation-a...
These are clear-sky contrails tho & some recent papers suggest in-cloud contrails are much more common (with uncertain warming effects), similar to the ship track debates
🌍 We're hiring a postdoc at the intersection of cutting-edge #AI and #Earth system science. Help us redefine how we build and evaluate the next generation of climate models. Based at @ucsandiego.bsky.social , funded by Google.org. 🧵
Thanks for the great thread Cristi! Shows the danger of fooling ourselves by trusting the paleo data too much
Even if we have to be wary of using the historical record for emergent constraints, we may be able to use it to grind through process uncertainties as more signals emerge
We can also combine this model w/the TOA models to get the atmospheric forcing ~= the direct precip response to CO2. This is surprisingly climate-dependent: weakly negative today, but more negative in warmer/humid climates and positive in cooler/drier climates.
In a new paper led by Yue Xu, w/Daniel Koll, we present an analytic model for CO2 surface forcing
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
There’s been much recent work building simple spectral models of TOA forcing, we apply similar ideas to the surface
For a broad group Kang et al 2009 (energy fluxes and ITCZ shifts) and Armour et al 2013 (pattern effect) would be good reads
…how high cloud CREs evolve after detainment.
Lots of implications for high cloud feedbacks and parameterizations
New paper with Casey Wall and. @blazgaspa.bsky.social developing an “Analytical Model of the Lifecycle of Tropical Anvil CREs”
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
We combine a simple radiative transfer param, with cloud spreading and microphysics models to get a pen-and-part model for…
Trying something a little different: why do we think of the Sun as yellow and the Moon as white? And why are Martian sunsets blue?
notesonclimate.substack.com/p/white-moon...
My first sole-author paper is now published! 🎉🎉🎉
It's the culmination of a lot of thinking, so I hope you enjoy it.
Thanks to the friends, colleagues, and reviewers who helped make this happen 😊
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
...but if ice loss accelerates and makes SSTs more Pliocene-like, effective sensitivity could be high
Interesting new paper by @vtcoop.bsky.social argues high Pliocene sensitivity is mostly a pattern effect from non-CO2 factors, esp ice sheets:
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Interpretation seems subtle: if ice sheets ~stable Pliocene may be a poor analogue for 21st-century warming (too hot)...
@agu.org has a tool to help you submit a comment to NSF on the importance of NCAR: agu.quorum.us/campaign/154...
#SaveNCAR
Thanks to @andrewilwilliams.bsky.social for reminding me about the H2O continuum
New post on the shape of the water vapor feedback:
notesonclimate.substack.com/p/what-contr...
Surprisingly, the WV feedback is controlled by surface temperature, not how much moisture is in the air
Bridging Physics & AI in Climate Modeling 🌍🤖
Introducing JCM v1.0: A fully differentiable, intermediate-complexity atmospheric model built in Python/JAX.
Training hybrid models is hard because legacy code lacks gradients. JCM solves this.
Do you like charts? Oh yes you do. I've just published hundreds of them, as I do every year. www.nathanielbullard.com/presentations
(Compute might be the least important factor currently, but will be more and more important)
Thanks to @raspstephan.bsky.social , @janniyuval.bsky.social and Tom Beucler for very helpful discussions
New piece trying to understand why it took <5 years for ML models to not just match, but beat traditional forecasts
notesonclimate.substack.com/p/why-is-wea...
My guess is ML's success comes from 3 factors: (1) infrastructure, (2) how it handles uncertainties inherent to forecasting, (3) compute