3-panel comic. (1) (A person with a picture of a spacecraft behind head.] PERSON 1: There are now three spacecraft headed to Europe: NASA’s *Europa Clipper*, which will investigate Europa’s subsurface ocean, (2) [Person is gesturing at a picture of a different spacecraft while talking to a person with a ponytail and a person with short hair.] PERSON 1: ESA’s *Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer*, which will study the topography and chemistry of Europa and the other moons, (3) [Person with a picture behind head of a Zamboni with a rocket launcher underneath] and the NHL’s *Zamboni Voyager*, which plans to resurface Europa. PERSON FROM OFF-PANEL: Oh no. PERSON 1: We tried to stop them, but the league is set on an expansion.
Europa Missions
xkcd.com/3234/
21 hours ago
2636
455
34
30
Thank you. Feeling a wee bit better now. 🙂
1 week ago
1
0
0
0
Rejections completely suck 💔 I know the odds for big grants/fellowhips are long and I should be used to it by now but its still a rubbish feeling.
Its hard not to feel gutted after putting so much time and effort into a science vision over many months.
Having a wee bit of a grump befour moving on.
1 week ago
5
0
1
0
Thank you. I was wondering about how copyright appled and how that would be covered if using an image made by others.
Glad I am now aware of what is needed if do want to included these spectacular colours images.
1 week ago
0
0
0
0
That’s reassuring, thanks 😁
I’m glad to hear people are open to it, and those MNRAS/ApJ examples are exactly what I needed.
Also: huge respect and thanks to the image makers - you and the community pull out details in creating these, which somehow miss even after months with the data.
1 week ago
4
0
0
0
@royalastrosoc.bsky.social is there president for this when publishing?
1 week ago
0
0
0
0
Loving the stunning JWST colour images on here 🌌 Some are even from my programmes.
Im writing an MNRAS paper for one of these regions—would it be weird to ask the creator if I could include their image with proper attribution? How do you even reference Flickr in a paper?
What do you think? 🔭 #JWST
1 week ago
6
1
5
0
Advertisement
Rather like this normally but not when I have an afternoon of outside activities planed with baby lambs and chick's. 🥶🐣🐑
2 weeks ago
2
0
2
0
The Artemis II core stage continues into space under the power of its four RS-25 engines as the two solid rocket boosters fall away.
This shot of the Artemis II launch goes hard
Credit: Brian Balail (@balail.bsky.social)
2 weeks ago
1265
231
20
12
This does raise the horrifying prospect that someone might rub a software update and we're going to end up with a spaceship with Copilot on it. And thanks to the documentary "2001: A Space Odyssey" we know how that ends.
2 weeks ago
148
36
12
5
First Woman to go to the moon.
First far-space plumber.
Toilet crisis averted thanks to Christina Koch: what a legend 🤩
The radio stations I've spoken to so far this morning about #Artemis are very taken with the whole loo-saga 😂
#FlyMeToTheMoon
ℹ️: www.space.com/space-explor...
2 weeks ago
112
29
4
6
What a Final of the Gladiators! Loving this reboot it's such a joy to watch.
3 weeks ago
0
0
0
0
Advertisement
"This is not straightforward... and the STFC thing is particularly difficult"
Understatement 😬
A thread with quotes from Lord Vallance and his thoughts on the "STFC thing"
1 month ago
24
9
1
0
Comic. Planets and Bright Stars Identification Chart. [Bright glowing dots over black background with labels underneath: Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Mercury, Sirius, Procyon, Antares, Altair, Betelgeuse, Vega, Polaris]
Planets and Bright Stars
xkcd.com/3219/
1 month ago
3532
491
62
34
Oof, only an ~8% selection rate for JWST proposals (225 out of 2855 proposals!).
1 month ago
49
9
7
3
Some statistics, which indicate JWST is more than 10:1 oversubscribed (both in terms of hours and proposals):
2,855 proposals requested almost 100,000 hours in Cycle 5, compared to the 8,000 hours available.
254 proposals have been approved
1 month ago
18
7
1
0
Brace, brace, brace. JWST Cycle 5 emails incoming — prepare yourself for the ceremonial rejection ritual.
1 month ago
8
2
0
1
The Science, Innovation & Tech committee have written the most amazing letter to DSIT/UKRI/STFC:
"What is clear is that, despite your assertions to the contrary... widespread cuts have been proposed before adequate consultation with those affected was undertaken. This is wholly unacceptable" 💪🔭⚛️🧪
1 month ago
117
61
4
8
I was expecting this to be a super rare earth element. Not sulphur!
1 month ago
33
0
0
0
Advertisement
Because “looking at images, not catalogs” is a dying pastime, the paper includes a tutorial on -how- to interpret images of galaxies. Qualitative information alone can get you a surprisingly long way towards a reasonable model, if you’re thinking through the links between morphology and physics.
1 month ago
77
17
6
6
The Milky Way arcs over and behind this view looking up at Rubin's shiny silver dome toward a starry night sky.
Alerts from NSF–DOE Rubin Observatory have been flowing for about a week...how many have there been?? 🚨
So far, Rubin has generated....drumroll please🥁
~1.7 million world-public alerts!
That's ~1.7 MILLION objects that changed in brightness or position in just seven nights 🤯
🔭🧪
1 month ago
107
22
4
3
I rather like the Olympics and she won the Gold. It was the uks first trampolining Olympic medal. So it rather stood out.
1 month ago
1
0
0
0
Rows of people wearing orange lanyards in a House of Commons committee hearing. At the front is Catherine sporting her "I'm about to perform an appendectomy" mask and looking particularly snazzy.
Here is my run-down of today's Science, Information & Technology Committee hearing (House of Commons) where @jonbutterworth.bsky.social @si-wills.bsky.social & I argued for no funding cuts, & Prof. Michele Doughtery explained why they were needed. The public gallery again packed with physicists 🔭👩🔬⚛️
1 month ago
118
40
6
8
@astroroyalscot.bsky.social Well done 👏
1 month ago
3
0
1
0
What a stunner. I did not expect such a large impact on the wider environment. Wow.
1 month ago
5
0
0
0