Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Andrew Chalfoun

Photo of abstract for article, "The Limits of Cooperation Inside the Christian Right" by Andrew Chalfoun. 

Abstract reads: The Southern Baptist “conservative resurgence” of the 1980s and 1990s is one of the defining events in the alignment of US evangelicals with the Republican Party. Lacking information about internal decision-making processes, existing studies have tended to exaggerate the cohesiveness of the activist network that ultimately captured the denomination. This paper takes a micro-historical approach to trace how movement leaders responded when one of the movement’s stars, evangelist James Robison, began using his ministry to promote charismatic theology that many in the movement viewed as heretical. Focusing on how Southern Baptist conservatives worked out the boundaries of legitimate cooperation in real time, I show that key conservatives initially tried to convince Robison to walk back his charismatic turn and rejoin the Southern Baptist mainstream. Their ultimate failure set the pattern for the movement’s subsequent opposition to charismatics and clarifies the relationship between the Southern Baptist Convention and the broader Christian Right coalition.

Photo of abstract for article, "The Limits of Cooperation Inside the Christian Right" by Andrew Chalfoun. Abstract reads: The Southern Baptist “conservative resurgence” of the 1980s and 1990s is one of the defining events in the alignment of US evangelicals with the Republican Party. Lacking information about internal decision-making processes, existing studies have tended to exaggerate the cohesiveness of the activist network that ultimately captured the denomination. This paper takes a micro-historical approach to trace how movement leaders responded when one of the movement’s stars, evangelist James Robison, began using his ministry to promote charismatic theology that many in the movement viewed as heretical. Focusing on how Southern Baptist conservatives worked out the boundaries of legitimate cooperation in real time, I show that key conservatives initially tried to convince Robison to walk back his charismatic turn and rejoin the Southern Baptist mainstream. Their ultimate failure set the pattern for the movement’s subsequent opposition to charismatics and clarifies the relationship between the Southern Baptist Convention and the broader Christian Right coalition.

New from me in Church History! I trace an early split between Southern Baptist conservatives over charismatic practices. The split shows how important Baptist identity (rather than generic evangelicalism) was to SBC conservatives in the 1980s. @aschurchhistory.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1017/S000...

1 week ago 8 2 0 0
Photo of abstract for article, "The Limits of Cooperation Inside the Christian Right" by Andrew Chalfoun. 

Abstract reads: The Southern Baptist “conservative resurgence” of the 1980s and 1990s is one of the defining events in the alignment of US evangelicals with the Republican Party. Lacking information about internal decision-making processes, existing studies have tended to exaggerate the cohesiveness of the activist network that ultimately captured the denomination. This paper takes a micro-historical approach to trace how movement leaders responded when one of the movement’s stars, evangelist James Robison, began using his ministry to promote charismatic theology that many in the movement viewed as heretical. Focusing on how Southern Baptist conservatives worked out the boundaries of legitimate cooperation in real time, I show that key conservatives initially tried to convince Robison to walk back his charismatic turn and rejoin the Southern Baptist mainstream. Their ultimate failure set the pattern for the movement’s subsequent opposition to charismatics and clarifies the relationship between the Southern Baptist Convention and the broader Christian Right coalition.

Photo of abstract for article, "The Limits of Cooperation Inside the Christian Right" by Andrew Chalfoun. Abstract reads: The Southern Baptist “conservative resurgence” of the 1980s and 1990s is one of the defining events in the alignment of US evangelicals with the Republican Party. Lacking information about internal decision-making processes, existing studies have tended to exaggerate the cohesiveness of the activist network that ultimately captured the denomination. This paper takes a micro-historical approach to trace how movement leaders responded when one of the movement’s stars, evangelist James Robison, began using his ministry to promote charismatic theology that many in the movement viewed as heretical. Focusing on how Southern Baptist conservatives worked out the boundaries of legitimate cooperation in real time, I show that key conservatives initially tried to convince Robison to walk back his charismatic turn and rejoin the Southern Baptist mainstream. Their ultimate failure set the pattern for the movement’s subsequent opposition to charismatics and clarifies the relationship between the Southern Baptist Convention and the broader Christian Right coalition.

New from me in Church History! I trace an early split between Southern Baptist conservatives over charismatic practices. The split shows how important Baptist identity (rather than generic evangelicalism) was to SBC conservatives in the 1980s. @aschurchhistory.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1017/S000...

1 week ago 8 2 0 0
Post image

BREAKING: we're suing CBP for hiding plans to wall off Big Bend.

CBP refuses to release basic details, leaving local communities, outfitters & landowners in the dark. This wall would permanently destroy their livelihoods—and CBP won’t say a word to them.
biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press...

2 weeks ago 134 44 2 5
Preview
No One at Waffle House Remembers FEMA Official Who Says He Teleported In

The server says she was once punched in the face by a customer. She saw someone overdose in the bathroom. A man took all the steak knives and threatened the staff. But she’s never seen anyone teleport into the Waffle House, like the FEMA official says he was. 🎁

www.nytimes.com/2026/04/03/u...

2 weeks ago 161 27 10 15

I too have been stuck behind undergrads in line for coffee. But I didn't feel the need to rant about it in public

1 month ago 0 0 0 1

Really interesting piece - check it out! Deals with some old but enduring sociological questions.

1 month ago 5 1 1 0
Preview
My Tax Dollars When the mundane reality of paying taxes takes on moral significance

Ruth Braunstein has a nice discussion of why taxation is an important part of civic participation that can mobilize stakeholder interests in government programs.

press.princeton.edu/books/paperb...

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

The paper encourages interaction scholars of all stripes to give this distinction renewed attention by closely examining the different work involved in marking something as against expectations and marking something as a sanctionable offence 4/4

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

However, despite obvious problems with the Parsonian account, I argue that Parsons highlights important distinctions between constitutive and regulative normativity that tend to drop out of EMCA-inspired research on social interaction. 3/4

1 month ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

Most sociological scholarship on social interaction has followed a path that is closer to Garfinkel (at least when it comes to normativity and rule-following). There are good reasons for this, since Garfinkel focuses attention on situated sensemaking, giving interactionists something to study. 2/4

1 month ago 1 0 1 0
Preview
Differentiating Regulative and Constitutive Normativity: Talcott Parsons, Harold Garfinkel and the Sticky Problem of Meaning In everyday life, individuals regularly confront novel situations which demand their attention and response. In such situations, they routinely deploy portable norms to select between appropriate and....

New from me in Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour! Social theorists have trouble explaining how intersubjectivity is possible if norms are open-ended. I contrast two proposed solutions (offered by Talcott Parsons and Harold Garfinkel), both ultimately unsatisfying. #EMCA 1/4

1 month ago 9 4 1 1
Terri Clark - Better Things To Do
Terri Clark - Better Things To Do YouTube video by TerriClarkVEVO

youtu.be/h1ScBNkXaJk?...

1 month ago 0 0 0 0

Wow! This is quite the song!

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

These are excellent! Thanks!

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Nice! Maxwell's Silver Hammer was already in there but the others are great additions!

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Working on a playlist for my students. What are people's favorite songs about violence? Bonus points if they're cheerful!

2 months ago 2 0 3 0

I have never felt more American than I do working on the proofs for a journal that enforces British spelling.

2 months ago 3 0 0 0
Advertisement

I will be hiring a full-time pre-doctoral Research Professional to work with me at Chicago Booth.

Know someone interested in studying conversation and connection? Please help spread the word!

More details, including application instructions, are here: www.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/facu...

2 months ago 35 28 0 3
This paper outlines a distributional approach to institutional analysis, reconceptualising institutions as distributions of knowledge and activity across people. We argue that institutionalisation and institutional change are best understood by focussing on actors with the requisite knowledge and motivation to keep institutional patterns going, fix them when they go awry, or transform them when required, here called functionaries. The distributional approach allows us to distinguish between two main types of institutional change often conflated in the literature: Content-based and formal change. Content-based change, the one most often discussed, involves the importation, recombination, or expansion of specific patterns of activity. In contrast, formal change, often neglected in the literature, refers to shifts in the distribution of knowledge and activity, leading to dynamics of centralisation and decentralisation of institutional patterns. In this way, the distributional approach highlights the role of functionaries in both institutional stability and change, providing a micro-level perspective on institutional dynamics.

This paper outlines a distributional approach to institutional analysis, reconceptualising institutions as distributions of knowledge and activity across people. We argue that institutionalisation and institutional change are best understood by focussing on actors with the requisite knowledge and motivation to keep institutional patterns going, fix them when they go awry, or transform them when required, here called functionaries. The distributional approach allows us to distinguish between two main types of institutional change often conflated in the literature: Content-based and formal change. Content-based change, the one most often discussed, involves the importation, recombination, or expansion of specific patterns of activity. In contrast, formal change, often neglected in the literature, refers to shifts in the distribution of knowledge and activity, leading to dynamics of centralisation and decentralisation of institutional patterns. In this way, the distributional approach highlights the role of functionaries in both institutional stability and change, providing a micro-level perspective on institutional dynamics.

New paper out with Marshall Taylor and @olizardo.bsky.social:

Functionaries: A Distributional Approach to Institutional Analysis

Instead of institutions as things that contain people, we suggest institutions as expertise distributed across people.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

2 months ago 13 6 1 0

When cooking with garlic, always remember the fundamental rules:

1) If the recipe calls for 3-4 cloves, use double
2) If the recipe calls for 1-2 cloves, use triple
3) The little cloves are freebies; don't count them

2 months ago 5 0 1 0
Preview
Christianity and Politics in Tribal India - Reading Religion Through an ethnohistorical study of the Nagas—a congeries of tribes inhabiting the Indo-Myanmar frontier—this book explores an unusually interest...

New from me in @readingreligion.bsky.social! I reviewed G. Kanato Chophy's book "Christianity and Politics in Tribal India," which documents an interesting case of the relationship between religious identity and ethno-national mobilization.

2 months ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

Volume 67, issue 1, of TSQ is now LIVE, featuring articles by @achalfoun.bsky.social, @gio-rossi.bsky.social, @daeunjung.bsky.social, @djhardingsoc.bsky.social, @criminovelist.bsky.social, @mmaroto.bsky.social, @dnpetti.bsky.social, @andiewinnipeg.bsky.social, and more!

Read it at bit.ly/45ezfzx

3 months ago 11 5 0 0
Preview
A Researcher Made an AI That Completely Breaks the Online Surveys Scientists Rely On We can no longer trust that survey responses are coming from real people.”

We can no longer trust that survey responses are coming from real people.”

5 months ago 260 125 8 25

Congratulations! 🎉

5 months ago 1 0 0 0

Secretly he really loves Reservoir Dogs but thinks admitting it would hurt his credibility

5 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement

You should take this post down since it includes six people who voted no

5 months ago 0 0 0 0

Guess I'm watching a Mira Nair movie tonight

5 months ago 1 1 0 0

my paper with my colleague and friend Victoria Tran is finally out!

6 months ago 4 2 0 0

There may be no atheists in foxholes, but there plenty of agnostics in badger setts. And don't get me started all the freethinking that goes on in rabbit warrens

5 months ago 4 0 1 0