Nah. I don’t want to call out any presenters publicly.

See also “It’s not about…”, which has become a remarkably aggressive rhetorical gambit for stopping people talking about things you’d rather leave undiscussed.

I'm at a conference today, wondering what it might take to implement a moratorium on the word "problematic," and maybe more urgently on the transitive verb "problematize."

This article explores the transformative role of the digital library at the University of Wales Trinity Saint David (UWTSD), particularly within the Institute of Inner‑City Learning’s (IICL) Birmingham campus, where students engage exclusively with online resources. It highlights the collaborative efforts of academic liaison librarians and digital skills advisors in delivering a fully digital library service that is both inclusive and future ready. Emphasizing the importance of digital literacy, personalized support and curriculum integration. The article underscores how library services contribute directly to student success and employability. It argues that strategic investment in digital library infrastructure and support services enhances academic outcomes and prepares students for the evolving demands of the workforce. Ongoing challenges, including digital equity, accessibility and the ethical implications of AI are also addressed, while a future of expanded access, increased staff engagement and deeper integration into the academic experience is envisioned.

The latest from #UKSGInsights: Olivia Edmonds and Taran Johal @uwtsd.bsky.social "The digital library: redefining access and engagement at University of Wales Trinity St David, Birmingham campus" dub.sh/xomcW9U

"A man of genius makes no mistakes": Joycean misapprehensions Joyce invites misapprehension in many ways. He overtly signals the importance of error with Stephen’s famous line in ‘Scylla and Charybdis’: ‘A man of genius makes no mistakes. His errors are volition...

James Joyce on his own typos: "These are not misprints, but beauties of my style hitherto undreamt of."

blog.oup.com/2022/02/a-ma...

Never Write Alone I’ve learned many things (so many things) the hard way over the course of my career, and especially during my time as a manager and administrator in academic libraries. One of the most import…

One of the things I've learned the hard way in my time as a library leader is that good writing is not the key factor in producing good documents. I discuss some implications of that in today's Vision & Balance post.

visionandbalance.org/2026/03/19/n...

We have a splendid list of candidates standing for election as a Trustee this year - thank you to all of them! If you are a voter, please look out for the email! Candidate details here: dub.sh/sjRhVcz

Fascinating study on an understudied topic.

Join us... join uussssss...

Countdown is on - just 9 days left to register for #UKSG2026. Everyone can learn something from the programme and everyone can benefit from the unique opportunity to build relationships with people across the information community. Register now! www.uksg.org/events/confe...
@uksg.bsky.social

Debate: Artificial Intelligence Tools Resolved: AI tools will provide a net benefit to scholarly communication Two debaters argue for and against the proposition. This will be a formal debate, with the result decided by the impact of the arguments on all the Conference participants. An initial ‘baseline’ vote is taken at the start of the debate, and another vote is taken at the end. The winner is the side that has swayed opinion in their favour. • Rick Anderson, University Librarian at Brigham Young University (moderator) • Darrell Gunter, Managing Director at Gunter Media Group (for the motion) • Amanda Licastro, Head of Digital Scholarship at Swarthmore College (against the motion)

What's on the Agenda at #R2RConf on 24-25 February in London?

Debate: Resolved: AI tools will provide a net benefit to scholarly communication

r2rconf.com/r2r-conferen...

@rickanderson.bsky.social
@amandalicastro.bsky.social

The latest from #UKSGInsights Peter Barr (@tweeterbarr.bsky.social) re: @unisheffieldlib.bsky.social "The collections concept at the University of Sheffield: a varied approach to the role of research library collections" dub.sh/bKwiJWt

The Copyright Conversation LJ recently convened a roundtable of experts to weigh in on a topic that is central to the library profession: copyright. Moderated by Jim Neal, the panel explored the latest developments in copyright...

Last month I got to participate in a panel on copyright issues with a really great group of people, organized by Library Journal. It was an honor and lots of fun. For anyone interested, the transcript and video can be found here:

www.libraryjournal.com/story/ljx260...

The latest from #UKSGInsights "Repository renewal project: a case study from White Rose Libraries" by Thom Blake (@akadidymus.bsky.social, @uoylibrary.bsky.social), Andy Bussey (@unisheffieldlib.bsky.social) and Kate Petherbridge (@wrunipress.bsky.social) - doi.org/10.1629/uksg...

Go for it! And best of luck.

The short answer is "everyone is doing this." We've been doing IRs and library publishing for 20 years, with varying degrees of success -- but so far, nothing proven both sustainable and scalable. The reasons are many, but we don't like hearing them, so we mostly ignore them and keep on churning.

Great read! Make time to go through it.

Ten years of a ‘quiet culture war’: where does it stand now? | Insights

About ten years ago, I published an essay titled "A Quiet Culture War in Research Libraries -- and What It Means for Librarians, Researchers, and Publishers." Today I publish an update in @uksg.bsky.social _Insights_:

insights.uksg.org/articles/10....

It's a report titled "Safeguarding Scholarly Communication: Publisher Practices to Uphold Research Integrity," apparently created in collaboration with @researchconsulting.bsky.social

Here at #ape2026, @carolinesutton.bsky.social is teasing a “big announcement” from STM later in her talk…

Interview with Rick Anderson Libraries, OA analysis, music, and work-life balance, it's all on the table

I was honored to be interviewed by Kent Anderson and Joy Moore for their Disrupted Science podcast. It was a fun conversation!

www.the-geyser.com/interview-wi...

#00108386617 in Commonwealth of Mass. v. National Institutes of Health (1st Cir., 25-1343) – CourtListener.com JUDGMENT. Affirmed. [25-1343, 25-1344, 25-1345] (AVN) [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:36 PM]

This is very big news: an appeals court has ruled that the Trump administration can't unilaterally impose a cap on indirect-cost rates for research universities.

www.courtlistener.com/docket/69865...

Why We Must Work Together to Harden the Scholarly Supply Chain - The Scholarly Kitchen At the STM innovation and Integrity days in London last week, it's clear that research integrity has become an increasingly pressing issue. Many publishers are reporting significant increases in submi...

"The systems that we currently have aren't robust enough for the level of quality assurance we need."

How might libraries help with this problem?

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/12/17/w...

via @phillbjones.bsky.social

The bow tie is pretty effective camouflage! No one assumes I’m a reggae musician either… 😀

Http://covenantsound.bandcamp.com

Statement of Agency’s Reinstatement of Terminated IMLS Grants Statement of Agency’s Reinstatement of Terminated IMLS Grants Washington, DC– Upon further review, the Institute of Museum and Library Services has reinstated all federal grants. This action supersede...

It looks like all IMLS grants have now been restored: www.imls.gov/news/stateme...

How about if they did both?

Robert P. George and the Great Campus Vibe Shift As progressive orthodoxy weakens, academe’s most influential conservative warns of a growing illiberalism on the right.

"I always begin with first principles. The whole purpose of a college or university is to seek the truth and then to speak the truth as best we understand it."

www.chronicle.com/article/robe...

Has anyone else been surprised, when serving as a peer reviewer, how often you check a source and find that it doesn't support (or even says the opposite of) the assertion in support of which it was cited by the submitting author? I'm not shocked it happens, obvs, but am surprised by the frequency.

Researcher to Reader is one of the best scholcomm meetings of the year -- and I don't just say that because I'm on the advisory board. ;-) Join us in London for another great program of presentations, workshops, and debate!

In Defense of Pluralism and Diversity: A Modest Manifesto for the Future of Scholarly Communication (Part 2 of 2) - The Scholarly Kitchen An invitation to embrace pluralism and diversity in scholarly communication models -- rather than attempting to impose a single solution.

Today, part 2: a five-point "modest manifesto" for a scholcomm future characterized not by universal openness, but by pluralism and a diversity of publishing models.

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/11/18/a...