The ultimate accolade!
In the episode the part starting "Alarmingly, the Port Royal Logic even says that ideas are forms in the mind..." is based on your article, which was super helpful for me in wrapping my head around all this.
Posts by Peter Adamson
Today's new episode! Arnauld’s attack on Malebranche’s theory of the “vision in God” leads to a nuanced debate over the nature of ideas.
www.historyofphilosophy.net/arnauld-male...
#podcast #philosophy #philsky
I have to say that despite working on Ibn Sina for more than two decades, I was unaware that he had an "IQ of 180"
Coming up tomorrow on #HoPWaG: the debate between Malebranche and Arnauld on the "vision in God": how we form our ideas. This turns out to be an early version of the contemporary debate over representationalism.
#philsky #philosophy #earlymodern #epistemology #podcast
Hi! We are writing to invite you to a roundtable on Mohammed Rustom's "A Sourcebook in Global Philosophy" (2025), April 30, 3 to 5pm (JHB 418). The roundtable will start with short presentations by Don Ainslie, C. Darlymple-Fraser, Katharine O'Reilly, Reza Hadisi & E Freschi
1/
#Philosophy #philsky
They're not that expensive actually, especially the paperbacks. Plus you can impress other people by leaving the books lying around, which is hard to do with a podcast.
Out now: New book from Prof. Peter Adamson (@histphilosophy.bsky.social): *A History of Philosophy without any Gaps, Vol. 8: Philosophy in the Reformation*: global.oup.com/academic/pro... #historyofphilosophy #nogaps #reformation #newbook
Whoa thanks! I'm blushing down to my toes over here, that means a lot coming from you!
Peter with HOPWAG volumes
HoPWaG Volume 8, on Philosophy in the Reformation, is out! Here it is with its happy author.
You can get it from Oxford University Press:
global.oup.com/academic/pro...
#philsky #philosophy#hopwag #reformation
And Shang Yang too!
Gavel
Today we launch a new mini-series on the History of Philosophy in China podcast, covering "fa" thought or "Legalism."
Was it a coherent tradition, and does it deserve its nasty reputation?
www.historyofphilosophy.net/legalism
#philosophy #podcasts #legalism #chinesephilosophy #philsky
I recently had the pleasure of speaking w/ James Hughes & Nir Eisikovits about a range of topics from my new book, *The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence*. Our discussion is featured on the latest episode of their great Prosthetic Gods podcast: prostheticgods.podbean.com/e/sven-nyhol...
#aiethics
#HoPWaG is a great podcast that I love listening to...occasionally!
Wakka, wakka.
Steve Nadler
This Easter why not hop on over to #HoPWaG and check out our latest episode? It's an interview with Steven Nadler about all things occasionalist!
www.historyofphilosophy.net/occasionalis...
#philsky #philosophy #podcast #occasionalism #malebranche
Just about to drop over on #HoPWaG, an interview with the fabulous Steven Nadler on occasionalism! Will our conversation contain any Easter eggs? Tune in to find out...
#philsky #Philosophy #podcasts
Wow counting down the days... 😂 #leibniz #philosophy
Next week's talk will be on Sanskrit epistemology (on Gaṅgeśa) by Jack Beaulieu:
philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/global...
#GlobalPhilosophy #Philosophy #philsky
Just published: "Seven Classical Perspectives for Islam and Science" edited by Shoaib Ahmed Malik, free to download as #openaccess:
www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-edi...
My brilliant former Phd student G. Fay Edwards has started up a podcast on Alexander the Great! Check it out here:
alexanderthegreatpodcast.com/episodes/dea...
Werbeplakat für die denXte-Veranstaltungsreihe im Sommersemester 2026. Das Plakat enthält das Logo von denXte mit dem Slogan „... macht Philosophie interaktiv!“. Es werden drei Veranstaltungen im Haus der Universität Düsseldorf angekündigt, jeweils um 19:00 Uhr: • 30. April 2026: Prof. Dr. Frank Dietrich (Düsseldorf); Thema: „Ethische Herausforderungen der Migration“ • 21. Mai 2026: Prof. Dr. Eva Weber-Guskar (Bochum); Thema: „Können wir Sinn im Leben finden – und wenn ja, wie?“ • 18. Juni 2026: Prof. Dr. Peter Adamson (München); Thema: „Fliegende Menschen und die Trennung von Körper und Seele“
Neugierig auf #Philosophie, aber kein Profi? 🧐
Dann sind unsere denXte-Abende genau das Richtige! 🌟
Im Sommer 2026 möchten wir mit Euch #interaktiv philosophieren & laden Euch ein, an aktuellen philosophischen Debatten teilzunehmen: 3 Philosoph:innen, 3 Gedankenexperimente, Eure Entscheidung!🤝
1/4
Discussing #FrantzFanon on #PhilosophyBites
philosophybites.com/podcast/lewi...
#Fanon
Join us today for a special episode in the China series: to celebrate reaching the milestone of 50 episodes we look back at Warring States thought with the help of Bryan Van Norden!
www.historyofphilosophy.net/warring-stat...
#philsky #philosophy #podcasts #chinesephilosophy
To celebrate reaching fifty episodes in this series, Karyn Lai and Peter Adamson of the @histphilosophy.bsky.social podcast chat with a leading scholar of Chinese philosophy, Bryan W. Van Norden about Confucianism, Mohism, and Daoism.
www.historyofphilosophy.net/warring-stat...
He would be, wouldn't he?
"I can't go on... I'll go on... smiting."
E.g. "I flirted with him relentlessly and by the end of the evening, smote him thoroughly."
Since people can be "smitten" when they have a crush on someone, I hereby propose that successfully getting someone to have a crush on you should count as "smiting" them.
I actually talk about that in episode 488 (the previous one), which gets into his explanation of miracles. He has a story about it but it may not convince you.
By the way let's bring back the verb "smite," one hears it far too infrequently.
Coming up in a few hours on #HoPWaG: Karyn and I speak to Bryan Van Norden, one of the most prominent and eloquent interpreters of Chinese philosophy!
We ask him, among other things, how should we convince skeptics to make the effort to investigate non-European philosophical traditions?
Like earthquakes *and* hurricanes.