Exploring Data Spaces in Scholarly Communications
by Christina Drummond
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/04/17/g...
Posts by Laura J. Wilkinson
Generally Recognised Standards for use in the data protection purpose ‘archiving purposes in the public interest’ [UK]
www.archives.org.uk/generally-re...
How ‘Tiny Shortcuts’ Are Poisoning Science: Seemingly harmless data tweaks are undermining the integrity of the entire field. We must define the problem to prevent it
By Thomas Plümper and Eric Neumayer
nautil.us/how-tiny-sho...
Crossref is sunsetting Event Data:
Strengthening support for data citations and saying goodbye to Event Data
doi.org/10.64000/rzb...
Also in version EN: Can You Brexit? A role-playing game
dogsandmunsters.github.io/Can-You-Brex...
Nobody Gets Promoted for Simplicity
“Simplicity is a great virtue, but it requires hard work to achieve and education to appreciate. And to make matters worse, complexity sells better.” — Edsger Dijkstra
terriblesoftware.org/2026/03/03/n...
Exclusive: Unrest at Wiley journal whose EIC is cited in more than half of its papers
retractionwatch.com/2026/02/26/e...
#RetractionWatch
Keeping Knowledge Connected – at #PIDfest 2026!
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/02/26/k...
How far back in time can you understand English?
An experiment in language change
by Colin Gorrie
www.deadlanguagesociety.com/p/how-far-ba...
Octopus is designed to change the incentives in research to ensure that what is recognised, rewarded & encouraged is what will best drive best practices
* Sharing Research
* Addressing Biases
* Research Quality
* Research Culture
* Fair credit
* Finding relevant research
www.octopus.ac/octopus-aims
The leaders of four major physics infrastructure projects due to receive over £280m from UKRI were told in December they have “not been prioritised” for funding
The projects include an upgrade to the LHC at Cern and a new US particle accelerator
...
Guest post: Forget pickles and ice cream. I published a fake paper on pregnancy cravings for prime numbers
retractionwatch.com/2026/01/30/g...
@eve.gd "Institutions shifting away from big tech", eve.gd, January 25, 2026, doi.org/10.59348/bs2...
The future of software engineering is SRE
When code gets cheap operational excellence wins. Anyone can build a greenfield demo, but it takes engineering to run a service.
swizec.com/blog/the-fut...
The 5 stages of the ‘enshittification’ of academic publishing
by Martina Linnenluecke & Carl Rhodes
theconversation.com/the-5-stages...
From Retraction Watch: Dogged by retractions, Iraqi researcher and publisher uses a different name
retractionwatch.com/2026/01/06/d...
A tale of three norths in three photos
1️⃣ The pier at Berwick-upon-Tweed, where the rare triple alignment of the Three Norths (True North, Grid North, Magnetic North) left England in December 2025, drifting out into the North Sea.
📸 Lewis Clarke (CC BY-SA 2.0)
you say "i asked chatgpt"
i hear "i asked [an improv comedy group]"
an improv group wrote this report
instead of a therapist i use an improv comedy group
Text reads: About synthetic panels Recruiting the right participants for a study can be difficult. You may not get the exact demographics you need, and the shorter the deadline, the less sure you can be that everyone will answer on time. One possible solution can be to use synthetic panels. Synthetic panels are powered by a first party proprietary AI model developed here at Qualtrics. Our synthetic panel is trained on thousands of responses from a variety of demographic backgrounds in order to more accurately predict how certain populations would respond to a survey. Our synthetic panel is based on the United States General Population, and is only available in English. This panel comes with ready-made quotas and target breakouts in order to represent your chosen population and make it easy to launch your survey right away.
Text reads: Question-writing best practices To get the most reliable and actionable results from synthetic audiences, consider these question-writing best practices: Ask forward-looking and attitudinal questions. Synthetic panels perform best with perceptions, preferences, and intent-based questions. For example, “How likely are you to try…?” Synthetic panels are less applicable for studies on past behaviors, detailed recall, brand recall, or awareness questions. For example, “When did you last visit…?”
Text reads: Discussion The current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the TPB when applied to health behaviours which addressed the limitations of previous reviews by including only prospective tests of behaviour, applying RE meta-analytic procedures, correcting correlations for sampling and measurement error, and hierarchically analysing the effect of behaviour type and sample and methodological moderators. Some 237 tests were identified which examined relations amongst model components. Overall the analysis indicated that the TPB could explain 19.3% of the variance in behaviour and 44.3% of the variance in intention across studies. This level of prediction of behaviour is slightly lower than that of previous meta-analytic reviews which have found between 27% (Armitage & Conner, 2001; Hagger et al., 2002) and 36% (Trafimow et al., 2002) of the variance in behaviour to be explained by intention and PBC.
Did you know that from tomorrow, Qualtrics is offering synthetic panels (AI-generated participants)?
Follow me down a rabbit hole I'm calling "doing science is tough and I'm so busy, can't we just make up participants?"
the brexit referendum remains one of the craziest fucking things a country has ever done
LOL. No.