Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Sheila Webber

Preview
Teaching with AI: Tool Spotlight This page from the useful Canadian online education site Teachonline.ca has descriptions of AI tools relevant to education (15 so far) saying what it is and why it's useful Go to https://teachonline.ca/tool-spotlights/  Photo by Sheila Webber: white cherry, April 2026
1 hour ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
iConference posters published Posters from the iSchools conference (iConference) held in Edinburgh, Scotland and online in March 2026 have been published. Posters include:  - The information literacy impact framework: Evaluation of modules teaching information literacy in context by Ryan, Bruce; Brazier, David; Ryan, Frances  - Small Talk, Big Impact: Overcoming Polarization through Informal Information-Sharing in Third Places by Lanier, Amy  - Coping with Inflation in the Age of Social Media: Economically-Disadvantaged Consumers’ Information Behavior on Reddit by Shelton, Amanda  - The Role of Chatbot AI as an Intermediary for Processing Health Misinformation by Seo, Subin  Go to https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/collections/2602 Photo by Sheila Webber: My birthday cake from earlier this month
1 day ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Friends of the National Library of Medicine webinars: Practical AI Use Cases These webinars are priced (US$50), but look interesting: run by the Friends of the (US) National Library of Medicine. The next one, on 28 April 2026 at 13.00-14.30 US Eastern time (which is 18.00-19.30 BST), is Practical AI Use Cases for Medical Librarians with contributions from a good number of librarians "This webinar explores the practical applications of artificial intelligence in academic medical and research library settings."  Go to https://www.fnlm.org/webinars/ Photo by Sheila Webber: more pink cherry blosom, April 2026
2 days ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
New articles: The latest issue of open-access College & Research Libraries News (vol. 87 issue. 4) includes:  - Barbara Maratos. Introverts and Library Instruction: Challenges and Strategies.  - Russell Michalak and Rachel Gandhi. Fostering Holocaust Education: A Collaborative Model Between an Academic Library and Middle Schools. - Sara D. Miller, Leslie Ross, and Kay P. Maye. The Framework’s Next Chapter: An Interview with ACRL’s Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education Review and Revision Task Force Leaders Sara Miller and Leslie Ross.  - Jamia Williams and Twanna Hodge. Reflecting on Our Careers and Transitions: A Year of Exploring Why We Choose Librarianship.  Go to https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/issue/view/1694/showToc Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry blossom, April 2026
3 days ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Call for proposals: Climate Literacy for Sustainable Futures The IFLA Information Literacy Section (ILS) and Environmental Sustainability and Libraries Section (ENSULIB) are organising a session within the World Library and Information Congress (talking place in Busan, South Korea, 10-13 August 2026): Climate Literacy for Sustainable Futures: Libraries Empowering Communities to Act. There is a call for papers (at least one author has to present in person) and the deadline is 27 April 2026. The focus is on "how libraries of all kinds can play a role in tackling mis/disinformation about climate change and support their communities to live more sustainably." "We welcome contributions that share original research, case studies, or practical initiatives from any library setting or region. Proposals might address strategies for tackling climate mis/disinformation, partnerships that advance climate literacy, innovative programs that empower users to live more sustainably, or professional development approaches that build the skills and confidence of library workers in this area. Submissions from diverse geographic and community contexts are strongly encouraged. In addition: Papers should reflect the WLIC’s theme, Libraries Powering Transformation". More information, including submission guidance, at https://2026.ifla.org/ils-ensulib/ Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry blossom, March 2026.
4 days ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Preparing young voters in today’s online information environment The UK government plans to lower the voting age to 16 (you can already vote in Scottish and Welsh parliamentary and local elections at 16 if you are qualified to vote in Scotland/ Wales) so there is interest in how this younger cohort of voters might engage with information relevant to voting decisions.  Earlier in the year a report was published by Internet Matters and Full Fact. Internet matters is a not-for-profit that works "collaboratively with our partners to support our joint vision of a safer, happier connected world for children and young people" (partners include Tiktok, Amazon Kids, Sky). Full Fact is the fact checking organisation.  The report uses "November 2025 data from Internet Matters Pulse ... based on a survey of 573 children aged 13-17 and 801 parents of children aged 13-17 based in the UK") and also previous Internet Matters research.  The report identifies that this age group encounters political information online, their confidence that they can evaluate it is in the 50%s and when asked about their peers' confidence, that is rated even lower. A small majority are concerened about the veracity of what politicians say and about the impact on misinformation on election results. A large majority of young people think that schools, parents / carers, Government, and social media companies all have responsibility to support them in being more informed voters (they were not asked whether they felt they had a responsibility to develop themselves). The report makes recommendations for various stakeholders, including about media and digital literacy. Sadly, librarians/ libraries are not mentioned. Internet Matters. (2026, February 8). Preparing young voters in a complex, attention-driven information environment. https://www.internetmatters.org/hub/research/preparing-young-people-to-vote-in-a-complex-attention-driven-environment/ Photo by Sheila Webber: spring branches, April 2026
1 week ago 1 1 0 0
Webinar: Deepfakes and AI-generated media The deepfake threat and how media literacy can help to address it There are a few tickets left for the free webinar organised by CILIP's Media and Information Literacy Alliance and the Deep Truth Project on 27 April 2026 at 12.30-13.30 BST: Deepfakes and AI-generated media: The deepfake threat and how media literacy can help to address it It will "give participants a practical grounding in the deepfake threat: what these tools can do now, how they differ from cruder forms of manipulation, and why the pace of change matters. We'll walk through real-world examples of how deepfakes are fuelling political, journalistic and health misinformation, share visual cues and verification techniques you can use and teach, and make the case for why media literacy is the frontline defence. ... The session will be presented by Ashmita Rajmohan, founder of the Deep Truth Project, a charity dedicated to deepfake and synthetic media literacy education in the UK." Register at https://www.eventbrite.com/e/deepfakes-and-ai-generated-media-what-everyone-needs-to-know-tickets-1985914701331
1 week ago 2 1 0 0
Preview
Call for papers: Information Literacy in a Disrupted Information Ecosystem There is a call for proposals for a satellite meeting to the World Library and Information Congress. The satellite meeting will be on 8 August 2026 held in person in Busan, South Korea (at least one author has to be physically present). It is organised by the IFLA Information Literacy Section and the title is Information Literacy in a Disrupted Information Ecosystem: AI, Misinformation, and Trust. Deadline for proposals is 24 April 2026. "This session explores how information literacy initiatives are adapting to these changes. We welcome contributions that examine how libraries respond to AI-generated content, algorithmic mediation, and the evolving nature of information trust, including approaches that help users better understand how AI systems shape the information they encounter. ... We invite submissions in the form of research papers, case studies, best practices, and conceptual papers." Full information at https://2026.ifla.org/information-literacy-in-a-disrupted-information-ecosystem-ai-misinformation-and-trust/ Photo by Sheila Webber: camellias, March 2026
1 week ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Library and Skills Centre Teachmeet There is a call for contributions for an in-person teachmeet at Sheffield Hallam University (Sheffield, UK) Library and Skills Centre Teachmeet on 4 June 2026 9.30 - 16.00 BST. The deadline is 17 April, 16.00. Presentations will be 10 mins each, with time after each presentation for questions. "This free regional event will involve the sharing of ideas, experience, and innovative teaching practice through presentations, activities and discussions. The Teachmeet is aimed at higher and further education library staff and academic study skills practitioners working in the North and the Midlands [of England]." More details at https://www.tickettailor.com/events/academiclibrariesnorth/2113039 Photo by Sheila Webber: Sheffield Botanic Garcdens, March 2026
1 week ago 2 1 0 0
Preview
Improving the digital competencies of literacy educators The UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL) has launched a self-paced online course Improving the digital competencies of literacy educators. You have to register as a member of the UIL Learning Hub (free) in order to access. The estimated duration is 2 and a half hours. The course is described at https://www.uil.unesco.org/en/articles/uil-launches-new-multilingual-course-boost-digital-skills-literacy-educators?hub=90 The registration page for the English language version https://learninghub.uil.unesco.org/enrol/index.php?id=78 Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry blossom, March 2026
1 week ago 1 1 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
New articles: Collaboration; Rebooting; Post-COVID working The latest issue of portal: libraries and the academy (vol 26 no 2) includes (open access): - Adopting the Reboot Mindset: The Library Instruction Reboot Revisited by Anne C. Behler - Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Library Instruction: A Case for Lesson Study by Alexander Deeke, John Kotnarowski, Kirsten M. Feist, Jin Pennell - Remote Work Policies in Academic Libraries Before, During, and Immediately After the Height of the COVID-19 Pandemic by Shanti Freundlich, Sarah K. McCord, Sarah Callanan, Natalie Hutchinson, Erica Cataldi-Roberts, Richard Kaplan Go to https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/56654 Photo by Sheila Webber: blossom, March 2026
1 week ago 2 1 0 0
Preview
10 Thoughts On “AI” An interesting (I think) take on AI and its use in creative work, from the author John Scalzi. As he says, he can "write better than “AI” can or ever will, and I can do it with far less energy draw. I don’t need to destroy a watershed to write a novel. I can write a novel with Coke Zero and snacks." He  also, e.g., makes useful comments about marketing, and the way AI is actually packed into almost everything already. Scalzi, J. (2026, February 14). 10 Thoughts On “AI,” February 2026 Edition. https://whatever.scalzi.com/2026/02/14/10-thoughts-on-ai-february-2026-edition/ Photo by Sheila Webber: camellia, March 2026
1 week ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Recent articles: AI literacy; Coding The latest issue of open access College & Research Libraries (volume 87 issue 2) includes: - Survey on Undergraduate Student Use of Generative AI: Implications for Information Literacy in Academic Libraries by Megan Margino Marchese, Andrew Marchese - Generative AI and Libraries: Claiming Our Place in the Center of a Shared Future by Terese Scheiderich - Python for All: A Library Workshop for Bridging AI Literacy and Coding Skills Kristen L. Scotti, Lencia McKee Go to https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/issue/view/1693/showToc Photo by Sheila Webber: daffodil, March 2026
1 week ago 2 1 0 0
Preview
Webinar: Attention in LIS There is a webinar organised by the ACRL Contemplative Pedagogy Interest Group on 29 April 2026 at 14.00 US Eastern time, 19.00 BST: Attention in LIS (Library and Information Science).  The speaker is Hugh Samson (Ph.D. student in the Faculty of Information and Media Studies at Western University in Canada). "This talk examines the concept of attention as an emerging concern in LIS. It proceeds through three guiding questions. First, What is attention? The talk briefly surveys accounts in which attention is understood as a selective orientation of consciousness and a mechanism that structures perception and cognition. Second, Why does it matter? In contemporary information environments characterised by abundance, attention functions as a limiting condition that shapes what information becomes visible, credible, and sustained. Finally, How might LIS examine it? The talk outlines possible lines of inquiry focusing on attentional infrastructures, literacies, and practices." Register at https://ala-events.zoom.us/meeting/register/4tzumZcIT_eaMa_O_nktgg#/registration Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry trees, Sheffield, March 2026
2 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Tickets for - Critical Approaches to Libraries Conference 2026 #CALC26 There are still tickets available for the Critical Approaches to Libraries Conference 2026, taking place online 12-14 May 2026, at the very reasonable price of £15. Presentations include: - Disinformation, platform governance, and critical information literacy: lessons from the Croatian Wikipedia case (Dijana Šobota). - Honoring students' lived experiences through instruction: how a shift in pedagogical practice can impact student outcomes (Dr Heather F. Ball). - Why are some ideas easy to believe on little evidence? (Dr Anna Stone). You can purchase tickets here https://opencollective.com/calc/events/calc-conference-ae7f7475
2 weeks ago 1 2 0 0
Preview
LILAC Learning Sets #LILAC26 One of the session I attended at the LILAC information literacy conference was LILAC Learning Sets presented by Laura Woods. The abstract is here and this is a podcast episode where Laura explained what they are about https://infolit.org.uk/chatting-info-lit-episode-eleven-learning-sets-at-lilac-with-laura-woods/ The main idea is that you join a group of about 5 people, randomly selected (by choosing a sweet of a particular colour on the day!). I had picked an orange sweet, so I've become a member of Outrageous Orange (one of the group's first task's was to choose a name). It turned out that 3 of the other members were engineering librarians, and one had been an engineering librarian in the past - serendipity! I can only claim connection with having supervised Dr Evi Tramantza's PhD, which was on engineering students' information literacy and also Laura Woods is investigating female engineering students' information exoerience for her PhD. We will be keeping in touch with each other over the next year to exchange experience, including through quarterly meetings organised by the LILAC organisers (led by Laura Woods). If it's OK with the rest of the group, I will keep you updated on how it goes. Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry blossom in Sheffield, March 2026
2 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Information Literacy award winners #LILAC26 The winners the Information Literacy Award 2026 (sponsored by the Information Literacy Group and the UCL Department of Information Studies) were announced during the LILAC conference on Monday. They were Siobhan Corrin and Katie Roper from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust. They had been nominated for the Lancashire Health Hub: a collaborative approach to reliable health information. Information about all the nominees is here https://www.lilacconference.com/awards/information-literacy-award They are pictured with the judges: Dr Konstantina Martzoukou, Elizabeth Newell and Emma Brown.
2 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Information Literacy in a time of polycrisis and cherry blossom: Sheila Webber keynote #Lilac2026 This is Pam liveblogging Sheila Webber's keynote on day 2 of the LILAC conference in Sheffield. Sheila's slides are uploaded here https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3COpggFid2YoBGeWm-5dPBqhz6vINE-/view?usp=drive_link (and will also be available on the LILAC website). The title of the presentation was Reflecting on Information Literacy in a time of polycrisis and cherry blossom Sheila began her keynote by distributing some information literacy definitions created by students on the information literacy module as one of the opening activities. Delegates are invited to keep these definitions as a souvenir of the session. Sheila chose the title because we are living in a time of crisis, and because she loves this time of year and finds joy in cherry blossoms. Sheila is convinced that information literacy is a "thing", and is an important standalone subject discipline. `the essence of information literacy is information, it really matters! The Institute of Information Scientists was an association that merged with CILIP: Sheila had been active in that association and also published an article discussing the nature of information science as a discipline, during which she uncovered definitions of information.  Sheila shared definitions from Bertie Brookes and Marcia Bates: "the pattern of organisation of matter and energy". Marcia Bates developed a typology of information: genetic information, experienced information, enacted information, expressed information and exocomatic information (i.e. information outside our bodies). Sheila showed some images of Ballerat in Australia, where a whole suite of information was produced to improve signage to prevent violence to staff. However, some people might experience all this information as overwhelming. Sheila then showed some images of the Wave (the location of the conference) and talked us through the information that is available to people as they enter the building, and how that differs for different people. We took part in a Wooclap activity where Sheila asked us to share the information that we have from the room we are currently in. There were a lot of people who thought the room was really cold! Sheila made the point that these physical experiences can affect learning. There is a huge amount of information in every space. Sheila shared 3 examples of visual images of cherry blossom, and the way in which images are created affects how we engage with them. One was a picture of real cherry blossom from Sheffield, one was an AI picture created in midjourney and one was a picture of Sheila Yoshikawa in Second Life standing in front of a cherry tree. Sheila invited us to think about the information that is evoked by the different pictures. It's imporant for educators to think about what information means to them as well as to their learners. Sheila introduced 7 ways of looking at information literacy: IL is contextual, it's a word/phrase, it exists in definitions, it is a discipline, it exists in frameworks or models drawn up by expert groups, it is models discovered through research and information literacy is also a practice. Sheila presented the definition of Il that she developed with Bill Johnston:
2 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Closing session #LILAC26 This is the closing session of the LILAC conference. It included talking to neighbours in the room about conference highlights, contributing to a padlet on What's next for information literacy (the questions were: What new IL challenges do you foresee for library users in the next 3–5 years? Which skills will be most critical for library users to thrive? What role can you play in preparing them? What one bold step can you take where you are? and What practical step can you take where you are?) The results on the padlet will likely be written up for the Journal of Information Literacy. There were several prize draws and presentations to organisers (including my colleague Pam!). St Georges University in London 21-23 April 2027 was identified as the next venue for LILAC. Photo - the entrance hall at the Wave, Sheffield University
2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Exploring Indigenous-Informed Pedagogy in Academic Library Instruction #LILAC26 The penultimate session I'm attending (though there will be some currently-part-finished blogs that will go up later today or tomorrow) at the LILAC information literacy conference is Collective Conversations: Exploring Indigenous-Informed Pedagogy in Academic Library Instruction presented by Adair Harper (Simon Fraser University, Canada). The abstract is here They started by introducing themselves, reflecting on their positionality and history, and acknowledging the traditional holders of the land on which Simon Fraser University stands, theese people's knowledge systems, and the impact of colonisation on education/ library practices. They went on to identify key aspects of the Canadian contect, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the Indigenous Matters Committee of the Canadian Federation of Library Associations (which had a report about responding to the TRC's calls to action) and the Simon Fraser University Aboriginal Reconciliation & Conciliation report. There is a Decolonising the Library Working Group in the university, formed in 2018, and a very small Indigenous Initiatives Team which is also developing the Indigenous Curriculum resource centre. They went on to identify other decolonising initiatives from the library, including the WG for information literacy and instruction explicitly addressing decolonisation. In summer 2025 they had reading circles reading a chapter form the book Wayi Wah, then in autumn/winter 2025-6 they started to apply First Peoples Principles of Learning and involve more people in implementing them, developing curriculum with the principles of indigenous learning, addressing biases cause by using colonialist approaches to education. They started by all looking at teaching materials for a class Foundations for Academic Literacy (FAL), so they could discuss and compare ideas. This module aims to introduce undergraduates to academic research. The librarians worked through this by each focusing on some of the materials and bearing specific principles in mind. This is still progress, so these were reflections on what has emerged so far. They found that focusing on one principle at a time was helpful in avoiding overwhelm. The process also helped in understanding and incorporating the principles into their own practice. The people doing this work (librarians and library assistants) have different roles in learning and teaching. Key principles that are emerging as areas of focus are "Learning involves patience and time" and "Learning is holistic, reflexive, reflective, experiential, and relational (focused on connectedness, on reciprocal relationships, and a sense of place)". There is a desire to bring more experiential and conversation-based learning into the classroom; to recognise learners' and teachers' experiences & knowledge; be an "imperfect friend" rather than a "perfect stranger". They have been revising the teaching material for the FAL module, will have workshops in the summer for colleagues, pilot material and then run the updated module next academic year, and also aim as write a chapter. Photo by Sheila Webber: in Sheffield Botanical Gardens, March 2026
2 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
"All mushrooms are edible but some only once": rethinking information literacy in leisure contexts through hobbyist mycology, Laura Williams. #Lilac26  Laura Williams is a PhD student in the School of Information Journalism and Communication, but this presentation was not about her PhD topic; instead, this was a topic of personal interest to her. Laura created a Zine as a way to cope with semester 1 library teaching, and this stimulated the presentation today. This is a conceptual paper, that isn't based on research other than reading lots of literatyre about mushroom hobbyists, and Laura's growing interest in mushroom foraging. This is an information-rich hobby: enthusiasts learn about mushrooms, they spot mushrooms and photograph them, go to mushroom social events. Is hobbyist mycology a risky hobby? Yes even the most experienced mycologiest need to continually update their knowledge of mushrooms to avoid dangerous encounters. Laura reviewed the current literature on hobbyist mycology to identify the information aspects to this. Laura dtaws on Lloyd's work to define Il as a socially enacted practice, and Hicks' book on risk in information literacy. Risk-informed information practice focuses on everyday information literacy, but Laura wants to apply these ideas to a leisure context, as much information science literature about leisure hobbies focuses on the joy of the hobby and sharing information. There hasn't been much research on fungi from an information perspective. There is a growing body of literature on multispecies information literacy, and fungi are mentioned as a fascinating area to look at as they are neither animals or plants. There is a body of literature on risky leisure practices, but information literacy isn't mentioned often or drawn on, even though information is a theme explored in the research. Risk is conceptualised as a balance between potential harm and the desired benefits. Information literacy: the mushroom itself is a source of information (drawing on Bates ideas of what is information). Laura has identified 6 ways that information literacy is enacted to manage risk Rules of thumb: quick and personal rules to assist decision-making, e.g. "never munch on a hunch". But the problem with these is that they take time to develop and are difficult to share with others, and can be affected by complacency. Folkways: folk knowledge of mycology and folk practices such as hunting and foraging. The common names of mushrooms are linked to folklore. Some folk knowledge fuels mycophobia and can perpetuate misinformation. Documentary sources are a critical information source; they contain authoritative information. However, documented knowledge can become outdated. In the UK, mushroom guides might identify a mushroom as poisonous, but a guide in another country might say that a mushroom isn't dangerous as long as it's prepared in the right way. The body & sensory information. This is incredibly important. Foraging is a physical practice that forces the forager to use all their sensory information: touch, taste and smell are very important. Sensory information must be used alongside other forms of knowledge. Mushroom books contain vivid descriptions of the sensory impact of mushrooms. Participating in communities: there is a long history of fungi groups, on and offline e.g. facebook groups. Some are only for the scientific identification of mushrooms, others are about foraging and eating mushrooms. There is always the potential that these groups can share poor-quality information. Groups have very specific rule that many photos of a mushroom must be shared in order to invite others to identify a mushroom. Technologies: AI and social media are affecting the information landscape of mushrooms, e.g. AI image tools to identify mushrooms. AI tools can't engage in sensory information, so they tend to be very bad at identifying mushrooms. Content creators are active on social media to share mycology. Each of these 6 dimensions could be explored further to investigate aspects of risk in mycology, and could be a rich site of information literacy research.
2 weeks ago 6 3 0 1
Preview
Matteo Bergamini keynote #LILAC26 The keynote for day 3 of the LILAC information literacy conference is given by Matteo Bergamini (CEO of Shout Out UK (SOUK). This is Sheila liveblogging it. I'll give the usual caveat that these are my immediate impressions whilst liveblogging.  He started by describing the work of SOUK which "provides impartial political and media literacy training and campaigns focused on democratic engagement and combatting disinformation online". He then talked about the labels used: misinformation (false information shared by mistake, which can lead from e.g. not knowing that "verified" accounts may have just bought that verification), disinformation (false information shared deliberately, using the example of information shared in the Southport riots), malinformation (distorting actual information for harmful purposes e.g. taking it out of context) and false information (e.g. AI generated text, images, videos). Bergamini showed us some images of people and asked us to guess which are real and which AI, the results of which showed that often it was really difficult to tell. He went on to talk about how algorithms are designed to keep us engaged, therefore feeding us what we might like, to keep hold on us, often showing increasingly emotive and extreme material, leading to desensitisation and seeing such material as normal. Social media can thus become a shield against ideas and feelings which are different to oour own. Bergamini talked about how this process is exploited by religeous extremism and incel/manosphere ideologies, feeding on people's insecurities and reinforcing negativity. This includes fascination with extreme violence, which formerly wasn't seen as a form of ideology. He also highlighted that the number of children who were arrested for terrorism-related incidents was increasing in the UK (20% in 2024 and 4% in 2019). Bergamini said that there is not mass radicalisation, but radicalisation can happen very quickly: it used to happen over months, but now it might happen within 24 hours, so the the time period for potentially intervening is much shorter. Bergamini presented the solution as being media literacy - the ability to use, understand and create. [Obviously I would say you could also mention information literacy at this point!] He identified the cross curricular initiative in Finland for media literacy, which does seem to have an impact. In France he highlighted a programme with 30 coordination centres for media literacy and also the Welsh digital competency framework. He also mentioned the curriculum review in England which does include requirements for media literacy education (though, I would add, sadly not as a subject in itself and also Bergamini mentioned the lack of specific resources for teacher training so far). Then he highlighted the Dismiss initiative and the other work of SOUK itself. He explained the ideas of prebunking (aiming to prevent spread of harmful information before the event) and debunking (work after the event - e,g, fact checking). SOUK focuses on prebunking, in particular technique-based prebunking (looking on the different techniques that are used for spread of disinformation etc.) An example of teaching with prebunking is showing a video with someone giving health misinformation and then discussing the techniques that are being used in the video. SOUK has resources to support educators on its website https://www.shoutoutuk.org/ including a podcast and lesson plans. One question from the audience was about whether SOUK had material to work with adults as well as young people, and the answer was yes. Another issue that came up in the questions was developing scepticism without people becoming cynical and distrusting everything. Things that got discussed including examining the different actors producing the information, also working on this continously, it isn't a one off thing. One useful tip about spotting fake AI was looking at the context of AI generated material rather than looking for "tells" that it was fake (e.g. not how realistic is this picture of a person, but rather how likely is it that they would be doing this in this setting). Another question was about having positive examples as well as negative ones [I was thinking here that highlighting information creators who were open about how they checked and reflected on their practice would be useful]. Photo by Sheila Webber: cherry blossom behind Sheffield train station tram stop, March 2026
3 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Co-constructing knowledge justice: faculty and student partnerships that transform library instruction, Heather Campbell, Lea Sansom and Ashley McKeown.  Pam McKinney here live-blogging from the final day of the LILAC conference in Sheffield. The presenters from Canada have blended roles that involve teaching and library roles. There is a lot of focus on decolonial practice in Canada, and the presenters wanted to enact knowledge justice in their information literacy programme. WE are all equal, and have equal capacity to be knowers, but sometimes certain people are privileged as "knowers", and knowledge justice seeks to embed equality. They were unsure about how to do this in their teaching, so this panel is about exploring how they managed to find their way. There are 25 people in the partnership, but only 3 people are presenting. The first question they explored was why collaboration is necessary to address knowledge justice. Lea said that there has to be ways of recognising multiple ways of knowing, so collaboration is essential to bring different perspectives and different ways of knowing in the team. Everyone brings something to the team. They have all had moments of imposter syndrome, but the group can provide support and reinforce that everyone has something to contribute. Ashley spoke about how knowledge justice is very much grounded in indigenous knowledge systems, and expressed a feeling of loneliness and thought she had very different ways of approaching her nursing course. Collaboration was important to keep on her journey, and support her interaction with students who come from indigenous communities and become nurses. The collaborative approaoch supported the whole group to decolonise their teaching and decolonise their minds. Its importa t to trust in the collective, go to communities of practice and read important texts. Knowledge justice has felt overwhelming, but it must be done. The trick was to find collaborators from outside their own white identities. What does collaboration focus on knowledge justice look like? Lea spoke about collaborating with instructors and other librarians. She is focused on relationship building in her new institution and is bringing the knowledge justice perspective with her. Heather spoke about the timeline of the partnership, and the points at which she's worked with students and the points at which they've worked with faculty. There are different types of collaboration that they have engaged with, including faculty administrative staff, and the centre for teaching and learning. She is leading decolonising initiatives that come through the teaching development team. They did some experimentation in Ashley's class and created some open educational resources. Ashley spoke about the approaoch to partnership and collaboration that is strength-based, so that collectively they can identify work that corresponds to people's strengths. Teaching knowledge justice to students has led to conversations between students and faculty that have led to a gradual dissemination of the knowledge justice in the university. It is important that individual academics decolonise their teaching, but this doesn't lead to systemic change. What has only be posisble due to collaboration? Teaching and learning librarians have to be invited into sessions by faculty. So the only way that they can enact a knowledge justice approach is in negotiation with faculty. So it's about identifying particular aspects of the content or particular assessments that suit a knowledge justice. Heather tries to make sure that she goes to university committees to spread a knowledge justice approach and tries to support meaningful change. Students who have experienced knowledge justice in the curriculum are able to go into the workplace to spread this approach, but they need support for this as new professionals. It's challenging because as a librarian doing Information literacy teaching, they only impact a small number of people, but raising awareness of knowledge justice can have lasting and profound effects on those people. They spoke about the need to record the meetings they go to and the other teaching activities as "library instruction" even though the audience and the mode is really different.
3 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Publish and Prosper: Self-Reflection and Survey Results from a Research Program for Librarians #LILAC26 First blog of the 3rd day from me (Sheila) of LILAC information literacy conference is Publish and Prosper: Self-Reflection and Survey Results from a Research Program for Librarians presented by Helen Power, Rhiannon Jones and Ethel Gamache (Canada). The abstract is here They explained that they tried a prototype in 2023 using Belcher's Writing your journal article. Then they wanted to find out what the impact of the programme, so they decided to do some research, getting ethics approval. Therefore they ran the programme again, making use of a research accelerator programme that was designed to support librarians doing research (6 weeks online of 1.5 hour session), also supported by CAPAL so it could give a certificate (if you attended 5 out of 6 sessions). It was based on works by Belcher & on Cresswell, adapted for Canadian librarians - this included language, where to publish etc. This was run in summer 2025. There were 35 librarians taking part. There was a Discord, aiming to help create a community of practice. The first sesssion was introduction, the 2nd on designing research (talking about picking a topic you know, different kinds of research approach, ethics etc.), the 3rd about working on writing, the 4th on developing evidence and interpretation (it was mentioned Belcher here was useful here, also they discussed knowledge justice), the 5th on strengthening our structure, and 6th on preparing for publishing (including dealing with responding to reviewers). They mentioned that on Zoom they used breakouts, whiteboard activities (e.g. where would you publish this title?) etc. Looking at the participants' profiles, on average research wasn't an expected part of their job, had taken a research methods course and published (but it varied). The presenters then introduced the ACRL Framework for IL in Higher Education and their definition of Information Literacy (I've covered this framework a lot in this blog so I won't describe it here!). Then they they pulled out the elements of the Framework which they found particularly useful for this programme (e.g. that research is iterative, that questions lead to more questions but you also need to know when to stop) and gave examples of how they were used in the programme. As examples (they showed all 6 weeks but I can't type that fast!) they used Information Creation as Process and Scholarship as a conversation (including giving and receiving feedback) in week one. In week 3 the learning outcomes were: discussing approaches to writing literature reviews and articulating claims for significance ("so what?"), and the ACRL Frames were authority is constructed and contextual and searching as strategic exploration. In week 4 the learning outcomes were differentiating between different kinds of article structure and also optimising different strategies for editing documents for comprehensiveness and clarity - the ACRL Frames used here were on Information creation as a process and Searching as strategic exploration. I'll also mention that in week 6 they covered wellness and emotions, when looking at the reasons why papers get rejected, and there was a discussion about predatory journals and how to spot them. There research of the programme consisted a pre programme survey, mid point survey, immediate post session survey and 6 month follow up. Also they qualitatively analysed the chat and activities (if people did not want to be included in this analysis they were excluded). In terms of which session was most helpful, this was spread across sessions 2-5, and what emerged was it was the session most useful at the point of individual need. In terms of least helpful, it was again mostly related to the stage they were at in their research/ writing. In terms of the participants' reported skill levels, this showed improvement through the programme and in fact it was strongest in the 6 month follow up. Also they had quotes about confidence going up and benefiting from interacting with peers. Of respondents to the questionnaire 8 had completed a draft of their writing, 7 not, and the 6 month follow up showed that some had submitted and all at least intended to. In terms of the observations, participants engaged more fully as the weeks progressed (having been less active in information interaction initially). They observed some breakout rooms: dynamics varied between breakout rooms. They had the suggestion of having the same people in your breakout room every time -  positives were that people might be more likely to talk & it saved time as you didn't have to introduce yourself each time, although there were downsides such as getting to know fewer people. Also there was a suggestion on having one on one breakouts, which also had positives and negatives. Looking to the future they will use their findings to develop the programme and plan to run it every 2 years with (probably) rotation of facilitators. They also plan to write an article! They also will include material from their programme in a google folder with the slides from this presentation  (I'll add the link when I get it). Photo by Sheila Webber: Camellias in the Sheffield Botanic Gardens, March 2026
3 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
Reframing Information Literacy Instruction through a Lens of Knowledge Justice #LILAC26 The last session I'm attending final session today at the LILAC information literacy conference is Reframing Information Literacy Instruction through a Lens of Knowledge Justice presented by Heather Campbell and Ashley McKeown (Western University, Canada). The abstract is here This is a liveblog, so this is just my rushed impression of this rich session. The presenters started by recognising the traditional holders of the lands that their university stands on, and identifying themselves as white settlers in Canada, and they shared aspects of their identity and positionality. They talked about the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the responsibilities it brings for decolonisation. They cited "We must make space to balance generate and enable diverse knowledge systems to thrive". They talked about the work being done in the nursing profession (as Ashley is a nurse educator) to decolonise and critique figures such as Florence Nightingale. The coauthor Lea Sansom also introduced herself via video. The went on to talk about how Ashley and Heather collaborated on teaching and learning, following on from Ashley discovering the university's Library Curriculum https://www.lib.uwo.ca/teaching/curriculum.html. This collaboration has resulted in the Knowledge Justice in the Helping Professions learning resource, currently an open resource, https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/epistemicjusticeoer/ They defined epistemic injustice [if I can find this definition in their book I will insert it later] and talked further on how there can be epistemic injustice even within that field of study, encouraging us to think about who we cite, who isn't being cited, whose voice is being promoted or supressed. When teaching undergraduates they use AI and social media as teaching tools, and they gave an example of 2 videos that show how gen AI is biased when prompted for images of people with autism. This leads into debates e.g. of where are people's stories being shared, what are the sources that are contributing to the bias within a specific discipline. The presenters then shared a clip from a video on Epistemic injustice in health and medicine. This video provides a stimulus for learners to share examples of epistemic injustice. Following on from that, the presenters talked about the importance of questioning who conducts academic research, whose voices are represented in the academy (e.g. on editorial boards) and who has power in authorising knowledge and knowers. Then they talked about how they do talk about the words epistemology, ontology and axiology (particularly with faculty). Heather said that she spends more of her time teaching faculty, in addition to teaching students. Prompt questions for faculty include - what is the origin of your discipline, what does knowledge mean in your discipline, who is seen in the field. The presenters showed a list of types of knowledge (including ancestral knowledge, letters, ceremony, plants, water, as well as journals etc.) and ask people to reflect on which type of knowledge is acknowledged in their field. This leads on to asking people to reflect on the edges of their discipline's knowledge and their relationship with multiple ways of knowing and knowledge justice. The presenters also teach people about approaching knowledge seeking with humility. Ashley talked about how she asks her students to interrogate what is meant by "best evidence" (troubling both words - best and evidence), and use case studies (each of which has an ethical conundrum). For an assignment she asks students to pick a case study and then generate a diverse list of references that could guide practice for this case. They encourage people to look for "voices" not "sources", focusing on (in their search) balancing lived experience, academic research and "arms length observers". Something there wasn't time for in the presentation was talking about searching (e.g. adjusting your language to find a wider range of voices). Then they played a clip from a video from Lea about evaluating material critically using a knowledge justice lens, using a "framework of harms" (do they have potential for harm embedded in them). This is applied to all types of information. Lea also gave an example of when a faculty member had said she didn't want Lea to take a knowledge justice approach in a teaching session. However, Lea was still was able to introduce relevant questions into the teaching and bring in discussion of the different types of online harm. She noted that the students were in this case prepared for this type of discussion (e.g. they felt safe to share thoughts), which might not always be the case, also the faculty member felt that the teaching goals had been met. The presenters finished by presenting some of the feedback from learners. Photo by Sheila Webber: magnolia tree, Sheffield Botanic Gardens, March 2026
3 weeks ago 2 1 0 0
Preview
Starting, scrapping, and rebuilding AI literacy at Sussex #LILAC26 This is my first blog post for the 2nd day of the LILAC information literacy conference is From workshop to workshop: Starting, scrapping, and rebuilding AI literacy at Sussex presented by Nicholas Heavey (University of Sussex, UK). The abstract is here Heavey said that initial initiatives felt a bit piecemeal, so they first identified a framework to help map skills across the curriculum. They decided to use UNESCO's framework for AI competency. This has 3 progression levels and 4 competency aspects. This helped them to see where gaps were, what they needed to cover and what they didn't. As this framework was designed for schools, they also mapped it to the UK's QAA HE framework, which gave a roadmap and helped to break this down for session aims and learning outcomes. Also it gave legitimacy when they went to talk to academics. Heavey said that the first workshops didn't go quite as planned but gave useful insights into how students were actually using AI & what they needed. The library team went on to a dialogic and problem based approach, e.g. asking learners iteratively using prompts to see what happens and develop effective prompting techniques. Looking at what worked at what didn't - early workshops were too technical, overloading learners with detail they didn't need. Therefore they turned to a more experiential learning approach, with more time to reflect. Secondly, they noticed that learners were anxious about AI e.g. not wanting to use it in a way that would make them discredited. Therefore it important to have open conversations, not being the assessment police and also not overstating the case against AI. Thirdly they have introduced more playful elements, e.g. using lower stakes activites/ tools to encourage experimentation. Two of their main sessions are: Questioning & prompting and Chatting and searching. Heavey identified that sessions are structured around the brain vs AI (so thinking about what just uses the brain, what uses LLMs, how can you effectively use LLMs to assist) "LLM and research tasks emphasise the value and importance of researching and writing". The focus is on learning and understanding and they ask the learners to think of themselves as researchers. They explain key concepts through analogies and metaphors, which can be used to stimulate discussion. They also remind learners that they are responsible for any AI generated material. They ask people to reflect on whether the response from AI is changing the question they are asking - whether it actually answers the question they are posing. The team use the CLEAR framework for AI prompts (example explanation here). Heavey presented a diagram to do with tool choice with more creative at one end and less creative at the other. They use a three level model - introduction; Critical AI skills; and (not developed yet!) Advanced AI applications. They have also collaborated with teaching faculty (which sounded like a good collaboration with co-design and co-teaching), and gave an example of collaboration with Law where students took on the role of trainee solicitors (they undertook an authentic task, evaluated LLM outputs and reflected on professional ansd ethical implications). This was embedding traditional and AI research skills together. In conclusion, Heavey saw this as an opportunity, as academics and learners are looking for support, and librarians can show how they can help. Photo by Sheila Webber: not AI generated - magnolia tree in Sheffield Botanic Gardens, March 2026.
3 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
The winners of the Information Literacy Award are holding their certificate and award. The judges are standing next to them.

The winners of the Information Literacy Award are holding their certificate and award. The judges are standing next to them.

The winners of @infolitgroup.bsky.social & @ucl.ac.uk Department of Information Studies Information Literacy Award 2026 are Siobhan Corrin @slaintesiobhan.bsky.social & Katie Roper from Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust #LILAC26

3 weeks ago 23 6 0 0
Breaking through the noise: exploring the role of social media content creators for fitness information literacies, Laura Williams. #Lilac26  Pam McKinney here, live-blogging from the first day of the Lilac Conference in Sheffield. Laura Williams is a PhD in our home department, the School of Information, Journalism and Communication. Laura started her PhD research in 2020 and is undertaking it part-time while working as a librarian. The theme of Laura's doctoral research is ultra-running, essentially very long-distance running. If you search for ultra-running on social media, you get lots of content of very healthy and fit-looking people.  "Breaking through the noise" is a verbatim quote from one of Laura's participants, as they experience social media as "noisy". The PhD research brings together Laura's interest in sports and fitness with questions about how social media shapes information practices. The research questions were formed out of her own experiences of using social media as a runner, and bring in Laura's professional experiences with IL and IB. Ultrarunning requires the use of a lot of in-depth information in order to cope with the psychological and physiological challenges e.g. pain, digestion, sleep deprivation etc. Information from bodies is incredibly important for ultrarunners, but they are also taking i information from the landscape and watching the bodies of others. Epistemic, formal information is used, as well as social information, and of course a lot of social media information. The presentation focuses on the problems encountered on social media and how ultrarunners and their coaches navigate these. Takes Lloy'd's research as a framework for the study: Information literacy as a socially enacted practice. It isn't a skills checklist but is relational, situated, embodied and power-laden. Social media research has focused on social media fitness influencers and content creators, who can be characterised as non-expert and unprofessional, who use social media to market themselves and products produced by partner brands. The information isn't tailored, and can be problematic. However, social media can play an important role in helping people understand their bodies, and can teach people about how to have a healthy body. Laura observed social media activity on Instagram, and then interviewed people, and will combine these two sets of data together. The observation was ethnographic in data, where Laura engaged with social media and diarised her experiences, including her emotional state. A second stage of 19 interviews with ultrarunners including coaches and influencers, was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Laura identified 6 aspects of information sharing on Instagram: documenting running practices, sharing opinions and critiquing, talking about problems & challenges, giving advice, promoting products and events and advocacy campaigning. She found 3 ways that information was shared: photographs such as selfies on the run, watches, and running kit "flatlays" where all equipment is laid out on a surface in preparation for a run. They shared video content such as videos of runs, routines, training diary highlights, and finally composite media, which might be things like running data. Social media noise is created by a combination of information problems (e.g. low-quality information, personal experiences rather than evidence), platform affordance (e.g. addictive nature, echo chamber, impact of algorithms) and social media culture (w.g. running to create content, influencers). Laura had to do a lot of very active searching to find running content from more diverse groups e.g. runners of colour, or muslim runners, or the algorithm would just throw up lots of white, conventionally attractive, young and thin runners.  The consequences of the noise are mental health problems and becoming burnt out or injured. So what strategies do people adopt to break through the noise?  Laura identified five strategies and tactics for breaking through the social media noise. People liked to create their communities, acknowledge that every body is different, resisting against platform affordances, being authentic and supporting information literacy: amplifying good quality information, challenging and critiquing poor quality information, advocating for expertise and authenticity. Influencers and content creators can play an important role in supporting information literacy. Participants spoke about a tension between competing for attention but also trying to remain authentic.  Content creators could reduce the impact of social media noise through activities such as teaching runners to understand their bodies, calling out poor-quality information, and sharing transparent training rationales. Laura asserted IL is important in this space, but it is complex on social media. IL is contextual, community-specific and socially constructed.
3 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Advertisement
Character Defining: a library journaling game #LILAC26 The next session I will blog from the LILAC information literacy conference is Character Defining: a library journaling game about creating characters from the unexpected connections between books presented by David Smith (University of the Arts, London). The abstract is here and Smith's blog with a detailed account of the initiative (and material you can download) is at https://daspgcert.myblog.arts.ac.uk/ Smith explained that it started with the idea of the game genre solo journaling, where you are prompted to create characters and story for a role playing game, and then thinking about how this could be used to help people explore books they would not otherwise look at. A library move had led to a weeding exrecise, but some of the books were worthwhile to read even if they hadn't been used for a while. Smith thought of making interaction with these underused books into an event - preferably fun - and thus the idea of a game. Smith mentioned Andrew Walsh's book on teaching through games and play. He was also influenced by work on serendipity and by counselling interventions that involved role play. Smith's aim was to enable people to seek out roles and stories that were not like their own, including developing conversations about decolonisation. An exemplar game is The Last Teashop. The principles for Smith's game involved developing a character by developing the characters/stories of others in the character's life (a mentor, love interest, rival family member), so the character's story was developed through their relationship with others. These other characters were developed through random interaction with the books that had been scheduled for weeding out. Smith acted as games master in the trial run - summing up he is certainly going to run something similar, but not exactly the same as there were logistics difficulties (books falling over), players needing more support etc. However, positives included the interaction in sharing the characters and stories, in players getting interested in some of the books and topics, and players creating a diverse, complex range of characters, locations and stories. The gaming aspect also stretched players' imagination. An example of a follow up was a project set up for MA Publishing students "Decolonising the archive". They took a selection of books and created a scenario where Smith and another librarian roleplayed strict/misleading librarians, with fake catalogue cards and the books hidden in a cupboard. This made the students into scholars who were investing the accuracy of the records and interacting with the books. Another initiative is using the library's photobook collection as prompts for sound art projects.
3 weeks ago 1 1 0 0
Critical thinking and dissent: information literacy in a refused knowledge information landscape #LILAC26 Next from me (Sheila) at the LILAC information literacy conference is Critical thinking and dissent: information literacy in a refused knowledge information landscape presented by Madelene Logren (Umea University, Sweden). The abstract is here Logren started by observing that IL has often been positioned as a solution to the spread of misinformation. However, this assumes that there are shared norms of credibility and authority, but this may not be the case. That leads to the question: What if IL can sometimes contribute to belief in misinfrmation, rather than reducing it? This could happen if people apply IL to e.g. spreading misinformation. Logren's subject of study was a network of nurses formed during the COVID pandemic. This network critisised Sweden's approach to the pandemic as being unscientific and unethical (e.g. a lack of informed consent for vaccination, ignoring social impact). The network position themselves as being both inside and outside "traditional" healthcare. Most of their activity is online, with some in person protest. Logren's  theoretical framework uses Lloyd's concept of information landscapes (e.g. this book) and Neresini's work on refused knowledge and refused knowledge communities (perhaps this book); thus to examine the refused knowledge information landscape. Logren's research explores how IL is constituted and enacted within the refused knowledge information landscape of this nurses' network. She collected from the network's accounts on Telegram and Instagram, and analysed a sample of text and images using reflexive thematic analysis. There are 3 central central themes - being a part of the healthcare system, creating community & producing knowledge, and becoming disallusioned. The themes are within the refused knowledge information landscape and reinforce each other. The network is open to information, drawing on information from alternative sources (such as personal experiences) and also established sources (so they are not stuck in their own bubble - they do engage with opinions unlike their own). As well as raising their profile on social media, they are also aiming to raise awareness and discussion, posing questions e.g. "What does medical freedom mean?" "How are potential conficts of interests assessed?"  Logren then talked more about each of her 3 themes. The first theme was being a part of the healthcare system which involved reflection on the professional identity and role of the nurse (e.g. being on the patient's side). They expressed frustration with the healthcare system (saying that it was bad both for staff and patients), and moved from friction/ frustration to refused knowledge (since the nurses' critique is ignored or dismissed by management). "Nurses have a duty to report if something doesn't seem right, We must have critical thinking ..." since the nurse has a responsibility to protect the patient, and take the patient's problem seriously. Creating community & producing knowledge was the 2nd theme - collecting personal stories as evidence so they can form a collective narrative (this includes health concerns not being taken seriously and also the experience of being silenced). Independent experts who are seen as willing to challenge traditional approaches are seen as authorities.  The 3rd theme was Becoming Disallusioned. This included critical engagement with information (applying information literacy / critical thinking)  which resulted in reinterpretation of institutional science as untrustworthy. An example quotation was criticising the vaccine roll out because there had not been gold standard (randomised double blind) studies into whether the vaccinations reduce hospitalisation and death. Thus "critical thinking emerges both as a moral obligation for nurses and as a way to uncover the truth." "IL practices can lead to and sustain belief in refused knowledge". This reinforces the idea that IL is social and situated. Logren's key takeaway was that the "context may shape the meanings and outcomes of information literacy practices" and one can't assume there is a skill deficit.
3 weeks ago 4 1 0 0