Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by David Small

Assistant Professor in Physical Geography Click the link provided to see the complete job description.

We are looking to appoint an Assistant Professor in Physical Geography who who has expertise in the field of Earth Observation. Application deadline 10th May, with a possible start date of 1st October. Further details can be found here:

durham.taleo.net/careersectio...

3 weeks ago 2 6 0 1
Post image

Durham Geography has reached its highest-ever position in the QS World University Rankings 2026—rising to 6th globally (from 11th in 2025). Thank you to our staff, students, alumni, and partners worldwide who have helped make this possible.

3 weeks ago 6 3 0 0

The exciting news of the day is Australia is likely to join the EU Horizon program, providing a major boost to our research and internationally connectivity in it.

European colleagues - think of us for the 2027 rounds!

www.minister.industry.gov.au/ministers/ti...

4 weeks ago 9 2 1 0
Preview
Antarctic Science Bursaries | Apply for an ASI Bursary Information and minimum criteria on applying for an Antarctic science bursary

Hi all, the ❄️ Antarctic Science International Bursary ❄️ is open until 20 March! £6000 bursaries available to ECRs anywhere in the world for #Antarctic science projects that extend the scope of current work www.antarcticsciencebursary.org.uk/apply-for-an... Apply here! 👇👇 please share/repost

1 month ago 4 7 1 0

Probably the nicest thing anyone has ever said about him.

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Video

My mind has been returning to this video all weekend

1 month ago 474 142 2 4
Post image
1 month ago 5 0 0 0

Was equally silly when they played at Hampden tbf

1 month ago 2 0 0 0

Yes that’s the one. We speculated that the ones we saw might be related to sediment washing into supra-glacial ponds, like mini ice walled lake plains without the topography.

1 month ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

Yes, mapped similar things in some dry valleys in Antarctica (2021 paper in Antarctic Science). There is a reference in there to Circular Moraine Features (can’t recall authors) observed in Scandinavia as well which you might find useful.

1 month ago 3 0 1 0

Yikes 🤦‍♂️

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Armand Van Helden - I Want Your Soul (Club mix)
Armand Van Helden - I Want Your Soul (Club mix) YouTube video by HouseMusicLover

Armand van Helden brightening up half time at West Ham v Man Utd m.youtube.com/watch?v=4V5x...

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

It’s been constant down here. Like living in a cloud!

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

@polarguy.bsky.social

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

Antarctic ice sheet folk, I'm looking for a Postdoctoral Fellow in Antarctic Ice Sheet Reconstruction [readvertised] for a 3.5yr appointment in Tasmania. Very flexible start date!

Join our new team, figuring out what is happening and what may happen in East Antarctica. 1/4
❄️

2 months ago 50 43 1 4
addison-wheeler-fellowship - Durham University

🚨job opportunity🚨

Durham is advertising 3-year fellowships (any field). We are very keen to hear from Antarctic/Cryo people who might be interested in joining a great group. The positions come with some travel & research funds. See here for details or get in touch www.durham.ac.uk/research/ins...

2 months ago 4 8 0 0
Advertisement
Dear Sir Paul,

Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct

I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues.  Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied.  

A 2018 report  from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”.  This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research.  In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research.  For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times  published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””.  Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian  on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. 

I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship.  The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers.  You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”.  Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists.

I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research.  This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. 

Yours sincerely,

Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.

3 months ago 813 297 25 29

This is great James!! Got some new modules to think about and can see so many ways to bring this in. Pints owed!

3 months ago 2 0 1 0
Preview
Research Associate in Mars Glaciology at University of Sheffield An academic position as a Research Associate in Mars Glaciology is being advertised on jobs.ac.uk. Click now to find more details and explore additional academic job opportunities.

I'm hiring!

3-year postdoc on an exciting new @royalsociety.org funded project on Martian glaciers @sheffielduni.bsky.social

Advert: tinyurl.com/6rzzk5d4

Terrestrial folks encouraged to apply (e.g. GIS, glacier modelling, geomorphology, or deep learning)

Closes 19th Jan. Queries via email.

3 months ago 8 14 0 1

Just bamming us up at this point. Soft play beckons…

3 months ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Polar Medal for two Durham glacial geologists We are delighted to announce that Professors Colm O’Cofaigh and Dave Roberts have been awarded the prestigious Polar Medal in the King’s New Year Honours list, which recognises outstanding achievem…

CONGRATULATIONS to @geogdurham.bsky.social's own Dave Roberts and Colm O'Cofaigh who have both been awarded the prestigious Polar Medal by the King in the 2026 New Year's Honours List. Such a well-deserved achievement for two excellent colleagues! ❄️🍾🥂

durhamglaciology.wordpress.com/2025/12/30/p...

3 months ago 23 6 0 1

I’ve seen metasediments, metagreywackes and turbidites, in Antarctica that look pretty similar.

3 months ago 3 0 0 0
An Alaskan coastal environment with vegetated beach ridges and a calm sea

An Alaskan coastal environment with vegetated beach ridges and a calm sea

22-month postdoctoral position in the Durham Geography department working on Alaska paleogeodesy as part of NERC/NSF funded grant. More details here, application deadline is January 8th: durham.taleo.net/careersectio...

4 months ago 5 6 0 0

Our new glacier biogeochemistry review paper is officially live! Check it out here 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

4 months ago 5 2 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Distribution and characteristics of supraglacial channels on mountain glaciers in Valais, Switzerland Abstract. Supraglacial channels form a key component of glacier hydrology, transporting surface meltwater to englacial and proglacial positions, which impacts ice flow dynamics, surface mass balance a...

🚨 Interested in the form and variability of the supraglacial hydrological system? @hollywytia.bsky.social et al. explore the controls on channel distribution and characteristics on Swiss Alpine glaciers in a new paper hot off the press at The Cryosphere! ❄️ tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/...

4 months ago 16 8 0 0

Congratulations Dr Turner. Fuck the haters.

5 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Current Vacancies

I am hiring 4 postdoctoral researchers for up to 4 years each. Topics include ice sheet reconstruction, GIA, spatial stats, and satellite geodesy. Based in Tasmania.

All details are here: careers.utas.edu.au/en/listing/ with titles below

I am also recruiting multiple PhD students (see below)

1/n

5 months ago 95 90 2 1

Easier to “comb the desert” with that resolution.

5 months ago 1 0 0 0


Hey ice sheet types! 👋

The memes about the insane number of starter packs on this thing motivated me to create one more.

Please let me know who I am missing from the ice sheet world. 👇

go.bsky.app/4SxszWw

1 year ago 64 24 13 2

You say ice shelf, I say ice plain…

5 months ago 0 0 0 0