Screenshot of the title page of an article in Ecology Letters TITLE: There is No Consensus on Biological Sex Madeline G. Eppley. A, Andy Lee Robert Dellinger, Ally Swank First published: 05 March 2026 | https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70350 Editor: Greg F. Grether Madeline Eppley and Andy Lee contributed equally and are co-first authors. ABSTRACT There is ongoing scientific and societal discourse on the definition of biological sex. At this critical moment when misinformation about sex is being applied to policy globally, scientific clarification is valuable. Here, we evaluate the primary approaches to defining sex and synthesise the active discourse to conclude that there is no current consensus on a definition of sex that is free of assumptions and limitations. While there is no current consensus, we do not advocate for a single definition and contend that a lack of unanimity is not inherently problematic. No matter what definitional choices are used, we provide actionable recommendations to improve accuracy when describing sex. Most importantly, regardless of scientific debates, no biological definition of sex should be used to dictate human rights.
On this Trans Day of Visibility, please enjoy & learn something from this fascinating & clarifying read from @madeline-eppley.bsky.social, @andylee.bsky.social, Robert Dellinger & @allydefduf.bsky.social
Read๐ onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
(๐ for this excellent work & actionable recs!)