Fig. 1
Applications of proteomics in wildlife immunology. The left panel shows the main drivers of intra- and interspecific variance in immune phenotypes and their influence on larger-scale processes (adapted from Schoenle et al. 2018). Yellow boxes indicate drivers that can be studied using proteomics. The right panel shows three main categories of application of proteomics in ecoimmunology and example questions that have been addressed in the literature. The symbols (+, ●, *) match the drivers from the left panel. The animal silhouettes illustrate particular studies as examples of the wide range of species studied, where (a) Otčenášková et al. 2023, (b) Li et al. 2024, (c) Geng et al. 2015, (d) Kershaw et al. 2024, (e: Chaousis et al. 2021, (f) Gillis-Germitsch et al. 2021, (g) Neely et al. 2018, (h) Mangiaterra et al. 2022, (i) Raposo de Magalhães et al. 2020, (j) Vicente-Santos et al. 2023, (k) Ruengket et al. 2023, (l) Kuleš et al. 2024, (m) Kuleš et al. 2021.
ICB
#Proteomics Approaches to #Ecoimmunology:
New Insights into #Wildlife #Immunity and #Disease
by
Amanda Vicente-Santos ,
Natalia Sandoval-Herrera ,
Gábor Á Czirják ,
Benjamin A Neely ,
Daniel J Becker
doi.org/10.1093/icb/...