🍿 New episode with @magnuslovold.bsky.social - grab the popcorn and listen 🎧 #plasticstreaty nerds!
m.soundcloud.com/plastisphere...
Posts by Magnus Løvold
Thanks for reading, Neil!
Thank you for reading — and sharing! 💚
At last week's #PlasticsTreaty meeting in Geneva, the world's largest country was outsmarted by one of the smallest. “Are we following Rule 45?” Dennis Clare of Micronesia 🇫🇲 asked, exposing the weakness in Russia’s 🇷🇺 procedural gambit.
medium.com/points-of-or...
The election of Julio Cordano as Chair of the #PlasticsTreaty process shows the value of procedural rules — and what can be achieved when they are enforced #INC5
medium.com/points-of-or...
In December, we polled Americans on issues around international law, and 77% of US people said that they would not support their government illegally invading another country — even if it was claimed to be in their security interest. Quite relevant these days! lexinternational.org/internationa...
An excellent article — a must-read for all #INC negotiators
“We reaffirm that all states, including in situations of occupation, are bound to fully respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law” — 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇯🇴🇰🇿🇿🇦 with @icrc.org announce high-level conference to uphold humanity in war in 2026 www.icrc.org/en/statement...
Building on the legacy of the #MineBanTreaty, the #ClusterMunitionsConvention, and the #TPNW, Colombia 🇨🇴 is stepping up to host a major international conference on phasing out fossil fuels. A new Oslo/Ottawa moment is on the horizon. Way to go! fossilfueltreaty.org/phase-out-co...
After the Geneva round of the #PlasticsTreaty talks ended without a deal, troubling questions are being raised about the role played by @unep.org Executive Director Inger Andersen — and an apparent bid to topple the Committee’s elected Chair medium.com/points-of-or...
💣 An excellent analysis of the #PlasticsTreaty 's Whistledown (aka @magnuslovold.bsky.social) of what happened behind the scenes at the end of #INC5.2. Once again, important questions are raised about the role of UNEP, which seems to support a low-ambition treaty #Plastics
medium.com/points-of-or...
#PlasticsTreaty recap post Geneva 🇨🇭
If consensus falters, countries will have to decide whether to call for a vote or leave with failure.
By Friday, we’ll know if the world acted — or let the plastics crisis run on medium.com/points-of-or...
The progressive majority may seize the moment. Spoilers like 🇸🇦 and 🇷🇺 are expected to push back. Heavyweights 🇺🇸, 🇨🇳, 🇮🇳, 🇧🇷 could try to retake control.
The High Ambition Coalition’s #HAC move will be watched closely 👀
The draft arrives with less than 48 hours left of the process. Financing measures may close to agreement, but the treaty’s core — what countries must do — is still up in the air. Delegates are bracing for a fight over ambition.
🇺🇳 #PlasticsTreaty endgame, Geneva.
This afternoon, Ambassador Luis Vayas of Ecuador will table his own “compromise text” — a make-or-break move to break the deadlock and push the talks towards a deal to end plastic pollution. 🧵
New blog post! Here at the #plasticstreaty negotiations, some countries are arguing for a weak treaty on the grounds that plastic producing countries won't join a strong one. Here's a short rebuttal: medium.com/@climatesail... 🧵
… And they’re back! PlastiSphere’s host @anjakrieger.bsky.social interviews the close observer and analyst of the Plastic Treaty Negotiations, @magnuslovold.bsky.social, to get a read on where things stand half-way through this supposedly last session (INC-5.2) of those negotiations.
Five days into the last round of #plasticstreaty negotiations, @magnuslovold.bsky.social and I got together to discuss where we stand. Listen here 🎧
#INC52
on.soundcloud.com/E1eFAK5VLUZF...
Hi #INC5👋 from 1972 when the @washingtonpost.com ran this lede: “We are all just a little bit plastic now.” 😮💨
.
Said the White House’s Council on Env Quality, “I know this is going to be a significant future issue… potentially our next bad one.” Re: #phthalates
#plasticstreaty
Six days left.
The #PlasticsTreaty talks are — again — drowning in brackets.
Take control of the pen. Or watch the deal disappear into a black hole.
medium.com/points-of-or...
Nice piece on #plasticstreaty dynamics and the possible ways toward an effective treaty news.mongabay.com/2025/07/as-u...
I explore how majority-driven diplomacy could rescue the plastics treaty—and multilateralism itself—in my new piece for Backchannel, a great new Substack for commentary, intelligence, and analysis on climate diplomacy, geopolitics & the energy transition.
substack.com/home/post/p-...
This could change in Geneva.
A clear majority of countries back a treaty to phase out the most harmful plastics and chemicals.
If they stand firm and use the tools they already have, they can deliver a strong, binding agreement.
Majority voting is standard in global health, human rights, even nuclear disarmament.
But in environmental forums, it’s a taboo.
Consensus rules allow a handful of petrochemical and fossil fuel states to hold the planet hostage.
For decades, environmental diplomacy has followed what Arild Underdal called the law of the least ambitious programme:
Agreements shaped not by the “ayes” of the majority but by the “nays” of the least committed.
On 5 August, the final act of the #PlasticsTreaty negotiations resumes in Geneva.
The big question? Not what’s in the treaty, but whether negotiators will have the courage to move ahead without spoilers. 🧵
The story — written by journalist @emmaanne.bsky.social — raises tough questions about the perverse incentives at play in mine action.
Emma reached out @thehalotrust.bsky.social for comment. They declined.
Read the full story: spoileralerts.substack.com/p/questionab...
“It’s highly disturbing,” says the director of @minefreeworld.bsky.social
Others in the sector describe Cowan’s logic — “don’t worry, we’ll clean it up later” — as deeply cynical.
Some fear he’s legitimising landmine use in a moment of real danger.
Cowan’s comments come as Finland, Poland & others signal plans to withdraw from the Mine Ban Treaty.
He’s argued for so-called “non-persistent” mines — but these still harm civilians, often fail, and are banned for a reason.
Other NGOs are pushing back hard.