Appeals court hears dispute over abusive‑process verdict and trial evidence in Ladd v. Bosch The Appeals Court considered whether testimony about legal fees and a trial‑generated invoice improperly influenced an abusive‑process verdict and damages. Appellant counsel said a document used at trial was hearsay and unreliable; respondent counsel argued testimony and alternate evidence were admissible under controlling precedent and that the abusive‑process and consumer‑protection theories were supported by the record.

The Appeals Court is grappling with whether a disputed trial document tainted an abusive-process verdict—could a single piece of paper change everything?

Click to read more!

#MA #CitizenPortal #AbusiveProcess #ConsumerProtection #LegalEvidence