📝 Joint statement on draft guidelines for #Article102TFEU application.
Together with 10 other organisations, we encourage @EU_Commission to revise its approach to better support Europe’s #competitiveness.
👉 Discover our 5️⃣ key recommendations: ccianet.org/library/join...
Working paper w Massimo Motta & Chiara Fumagalli on @EU_Commission draft #Guidelines on #Article102TFEU #exclusionaryabuse now @SSRN. This is an updated (in light of recent @EUCourtPress papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm
With Profs Massimo Motta and Chiara Fumagalli we have submitted a response to the @EU_Commission consultation on the draft #Guidelinesonexclusionaryabuse #Article102TFEU available @SSRN. In the submission, we identify several areas of improvement from...
Looking forward to presenting my latest research on #abuse of a #dominantposition under #Article102TFEU at the Portuguese Competition Authority on 4 June in Lisbon. Online participation is also possible for those interested via:...
is no #object vs #effect dichotomy under #Article102TFEU; the Court adopts an #effectsbased approach with the as efficient competitor *standard* (not the test) applying across the board; there is a uniform legal test for #pricing and #nonpricing abuses; and the evolution of the
I offer some predictions as to the future, specifically when it comes to the application of #EU #competitionlaw and #Article102TFEU in digital markets, alongside regulations such as the #DigitalMarketsAct. In the end, I conclude that the Court and the European Commission may
I illustrate that there is a single test of abuse for exclusionary conduct, and it requires an effects analysis. I show that the Court has progressively adopted an economic, #effectsbased approach to #Article102TFEU over the last decade, although we are still in a #hybrid era.
