![How to Play Bonus Stages [Sonic Mania] #gaming #letsplay #sonicmania #sonicthehedgehog](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:4p2cbkxddz4ch6ykt3nmacj3/bafkreid32nqthmwa5xvf5ibfzrnskigr7frj6ygvcpcg4n35tyaatlqfgu)
youtube.com/shorts/gSvBt...
Only 1 step, you wanna know what it is...? #sonicorigins #specialstage #bluesphere #davechipotle #leveledup #comedy
0
0
0
0
Hashtag
#BlueSphere
Advertisement · 728 × 90
snapshot of docket from Grumpy Cat v. Schedule A, 1:22-cv-01088, showing a TRO followed by the following: "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: On March 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint against a list of 250 defendants on an accompanying Schedule A. (Dckt. No. 7 ) Then, two days later, on March 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against only 10 defendants, and dropped the other 240 defendants. By October 13, 2022, Plaintiff's counsel must file a statement explaining that maneuver. Why did you sue 250 defendants, and then dismiss 240 of the 250 defendants two days later? Did Plaintiff later sue those other 240 defendants in another lawsuit? If so, in what lawsuit (meaning what case and case number)? The Court expects candor from counsel. The filing must be signed by all counsel of record, and thus must certify that the response is accurate within the meaning of the Federal Rules. The closure of this case (Dckt. No. 26 ) does not impair counsel's obligation to comply with this Order. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Docket Text Modified on 10/14/2022) (jjr, ). (Entered: 10/11/2022)"
Oh, THIS is interesting (from another Hughes Socol case before Judge Seeger, right before #BlueSphere). Grumpy Cat v. Schedule A, 1:22-cv-01088.
1
0
1
0
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court recently took a look at the docket in this case. On October 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint with 218 defendants on an accompanying Schedule A. On October 24, 2022, after the assignment of the case to this Court, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint with a new Schedule A. The new Schedule A included only five defendants. So 213 defendants vanished. By December 21, 2022, Plaintiff's counsel must file a statement and explain why they did that. They must explain why they filed a complaint against 218 defendants on October 13, and then filed an amended complaint against only five of the 218 defendants on October 24, only eleven days later. The Court requires a straight answer. Respond to the Court's question with candor. The statement also must reveal whether Plaintiff's counsel later filed a new case on behalf of the same Plaintiff against the 213 vanished defendants, and whether that case was assigned to a new judge. Give specifics. The Court repeats its admonition: the Court expects candor. A failure to comply will lead to appropriate relief. The Court will simply note that this unfortunate episode is not the first time that Plaintiff's counsel did this maneuver. But it will be the last. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Entered: 12/19/2022)
Rereading the 12/19/22 minute order from the #BlueSphere case: "[T]his unfortunate episode is not the first time that Plaintiff's counsel did this maneuver. But it will be the last."
6
0
1
1
This is the firm that represented #BlueSphere, btw.
1
0
1
0
◻️
Can't find Thiel and Anduril. But in this, Foundry which UK is using. 'course those who know know quite a lot but for those who don't, some stuff for the #Bluesphere :
1
2
0
0
\\ FN76'S BLUE SPHERE GAUNTLET //
enjoy
4096 6262 8103
4866 9941 0328
2450 8259 9399
3579 7289 5711
3623 8573 7689
3273 3952 1399
4545 1258 5883
5210 8457 9738
4190 8330 0767
2826 8033 8074
3492 6045 6731
3836 5191 6827
2826 8964 2907
3170 7704 0920
#getbluespheres
#bluesphere
#bluespheres
#sonic
1
0
0
0
Further, and more importantly, none of the Overlapping Defendants challenged joinder in the 2024 Matter, nor did the Court ever issue an Order denying joinder. Rather, the Court requested supplementation to support joinder in relations to Plaintiff’s counsel’s second TRO. (Dkt.15 of 2024 Matter). Instead of doing so, Plaintiff’s counsel opted to amend the Complaint, a litigation strategy this Court acknowledged is common place in patent litigation.
Shades of #BlueSphere:
2
0
1
0
U.S. Trademark Reg. No. Reg. 4,417,549 - GRUMPY CAT for clothing, etc.
U.S. TM Reg. No. 4,820,434 - grumpy cat face for clothing, etc.
So, there's a company that owns trademark registrations for the phrase GRUMPY CAT for use in connection with various goods, including clothing, among other registrations.
This company has filed at least 60 #ScheduleA cases, represented by Hughes Sokol (the #BlueSphere firm).
34
8
1
0
This is also the firm that filed the #BlueSphere case.
1
0
0
0
Hi to any #Brisbanites out there in #bluesphere your second #affordableartfair is just around the corner & I have some new paintings winging their way... #aussielandscapepainting #aspiregallery
2
0
0
0
This is also, btw, the firm from the #BlueSphere case:
1
0
0
0
This week in #ScheduleA:
- Judge Valderrama joins the anti-Bose team:
bsky.app/profile/desi...
- Judge Perry GETS IT: blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/202...
- Legal damages, you say? bsky.app/profile/desi...
- "Chinese" writing that isn't: bsky.app/profile/desi...
- #BlueSphere turns 2:
8
2
0
1
Just re-reading the #BlueSphere hearing transcript.
Judge Seeger: "Judge shopping ain't a thing here or anywhere else."
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
#ScheduleA
12
2
2
3
For example, I've noticed that one firm (not the one from the #BlueSphere case) that seems to be auto-amending whenever their cases get assigned to Seeger:
1
0
1
1
He is also the judge who caught the #BlueSphere judge shopping.
2
0
0
0
screenshot from a CourtListener docket showing that this plaintiff is represented by Whitewood Law, PLLC of New York
And it's *not* the #BlueSphere guys this time: www.courtlistener.com/docket/69333...
1
0
0
0
This plaintiff is not represented by the #BlueSphere lawyers, just for the record.
1
0
0
0
The Schedule A from the first case appears to still be under seal, so we (the public) can't tell whether this is a #BlueSphere scenario or a totally new case.
1
0
1
0
Judge Seeger caught these attorneys judge-shopping and ordered them "to come clean and file a statement before [the original judge], fully and candidly informing the Court of what they did" and "prohibit[ed] Plaintiff's counsel from pulling any comparable maneuver in any future case...." #BlueSphere
16
3
0
3
Yes, this is the law firm from the #BlueSphere case.
1
0
1
1
Another reason why we need to work on expanding the #BlueSphere and support more #BluFluencers
@briantylercohen.bsky.social
@mmpadellan.bsky.social @teapainusa.bsky.social @meidastouch.com
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
0
9
0
0
0